Mutagenesis and mapping of a mouse gene, Clock, essential for circadian behavior - PubMed (original) (raw)

Mutagenesis and mapping of a mouse gene, Clock, essential for circadian behavior

M H Vitaterna et al. Science. 1994.

Abstract

In a search for genes that regulate circadian rhythms in mammals, the progeny of mice treated with N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) were screened for circadian clock mutations. A semidominant mutation, Clock, that lengthens circadian period and abolishes persistence of rhythmicity was identified. Clock segregated as a single gene that mapped to the midportion of mouse chromosome 5, a region syntenic to human chromosome 4. The power of ENU mutagenesis combined with the ability to clone murine genes by map position provides a generally applicable approach to study complex behavior in mammals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 1. ENU mutagenesis screen

A behavioral assay was used to test for the presence of circadian rhythm mutations in firstgeneration offspring of ENU-treated males. (A) The mutagenesis procedure. Young male B6 mice were injected intraperitoneally with ENU at 150 mg/kg. On recovery of fertility, they were bred with B6 females to produce G1 offspring heterozygous for any induced mutations. Dominant or semidominant mutations could then be detected in G1 offspring. (B) Representative activity record of a wild-type G1 female from the screen. The record is double-plotted so that 48 hours are shown for each horizontal trace, and each day’s record is presented both to the right and beneath that of the preceding day. Wheel revolutions are recorded as pen deflections so that the dark regions represent times of activity. The animal was kept in LD14:10 for the first 20 days (illustrated by the bar above the record), then transferred to constant darkness (DD). Light pulses of 5 min were given on the days indicated by arrows. On transfer to DD, this animal exhibited a period of 23.7 hours. (C) Distribution of period among 304 G1 offspring tested for circadian phenotype. One animal, #25, exhibited a period that deviated from the mean by more than an hour. (D) Activity record of G1-25, the founder animal. This animal exhibited a period of 24.8 hours after 30 days in DD. (E) Distribution of period among 23 B6 N2 offspring from the founder animal. Thirteen offspring exhibited periods within the normal range, whereas 10 had periods longer than normal, comparable with that of the founder animal. (F) Representative activity record of a heterozygous male B6 N2 offspring. This animal had a period of 24.8 hours in DD.

Fig. 2

Fig. 2. Circadian activity records of F2 generation mice

The activity LD records of six F2 offspring [B6 F DD A to D; (BALB × B6)F2, E to H] are shown. All animals were kept on LD12:12 for the first 7 to 10 days illustrated, then transferred to DD on the day indicated by a line in the right margin. (A) Activity record of a wild-type B6 F2 mouse. This animal had a period of 23.6 hours in DD. (B) Activity record of a heterozygous Clock/+ B6 F2 mouse. This animal had a period of 24.8 hours in DO. (C) Activity record of a homozygous Clock/Clock B6 F2 mouse. This individual had a period of 27.1 hours for the first 10 days in DD. There is a loss of circadian rhythmicity thereafter and only an ultradian rhythm is apparent. (D) The same activity record as illustrated in (C), plotted on a 27-hour time base. The approximately 27-hour periodicity during the first part of exposure to DD appears as vertically aligned activity bouts. (E) Activity record of a wild-type (BALB × B6)F2 mouse. This individual had a steady-state period of 23.1 hours in DD. A 6-hour light pulse was given on the day indicated by an arrow, resulting in a 1-hour phase advance in the activity rhythm. (F) Activity record of a heterozygous Clock/+ (BALB × B6)F2 mouse. This individual had a steady-state period of 24.7 hours in DD. A 6-hour light pulse was given on the day indicated by an arrow, resulting in a 3.3-hour phase advance in the activity rhythm. (G) Activity record of a homozygous Clock/Clock (BALB × B6)F2 mouse. This animal had a long period during the initial interval in DD, which damped out after about five cycles leaving an ultradian pattern. After a 6-hour light pulse indicated by the arrow, a period of 28.2 hours was observed, which then persisted for at least 15 cycles. (H) The same activity record as illustrated in (G) plotted on a 28.5-hour time base to show the transient restoration of a long periodicity after the light pulse by vertically aligning activity bouts.

Fig. 3

Fig. 3. Analysis of periodicity of homozygous Clock mutants

The activity records of four homozygous Clock/Clock (BALB × B6)F2 individuals are shown (A to D). All animals shown were kept under LD12:12 for the first 12 days shown, then transferred to DD as indicated by the line in the right margin. A 6-hour light pulse was given on the day indicated by an arrow. Among the animals whose records are shown, no circadian rhythmicity persisted for more than about 10 cycles after either the initial transfer to DD or the light pulse. The corresponding Fourier analysis for each activity record is shown to the right (E to H). Fourier analyses encompass a 10-day interval corresponding to the 10 days preceding the light pulse (18). PSD, power spectral density. The frequency corresponding to one cycle per day, or a 24-hour period, is indicated by an arrow. Peaks corresponding to approximately 6- to 9-hour ultradian periods are seen for each animal.

Fig. 4

Fig. 4. Mapping of the Clock mutation

A panel of 100 [(BALB × B6)F1 × B6]N2 mice was used to map Clock by genetic linkage and haplotype analysis. (A) The mating system used to produce the backcross panel. A schematic illustration of a pair of chromosomes is shown for each animal: circles represent centromeres, squares represent alleles at loci along the length of the chromosome, open symbols represent BALB alleles, and filled symbols represent B6 alleles. Clock heterozygous (+/m) B6 males were bred with wild-type (+/+) BALB females. The offspring were behaviorally tested and the Clock heterozygous F1 individuals were backcrossed to wild-type B6 to produce the N2 generation. One chromosome of each pair of autosomes in the N2 offspring is of B6 provenance (from the B6 parent), whereas the other (from the F1 parent) may be of either parental type or recombinant. Because the Clock mutation descends from a B6 animal, N2 offspring that are Clock/+ should carry B6 alleles at loci that flank the Clock locus, while +/+ offspring should carry BALB alleles at these loci. (B) Distribution of the period phenotype among the 100 animals. The steady-state period clearly distinguished animals between the two genotypes: 58 individuals were wild type and 42 individuals were heterozygous. See Table 1, cross 7, for analysis. (C) The assortment of haplotypes for chromosome 5 observed among the 100 N2 generation mice. Thirty-six animals had nonrecombinant haplotypes, 48 had singly recombinant haplotypes, and 16 exhibited doubly recombinant haplotypes. (D) Map of chromosome 5 showing the position of Clock relative to SSLP markers. Distances between loci are shown to the left in centimorgans ± standard error (cM ± SE), calculated with the program Map Manager (31). The lod scores to the right of each locus represent the logarithm of the odds for the pairwise test of linkage of the locus to Clock.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Klein DC, Moore RY, Reppert SM, editors. Suprachiasmatic Nucleus: The Mind’s Clock. Oxford University Press; New York: 1991.
    2. Takahashi JS. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1991;1:556. - PubMed
    3. Takahashi JS, Murakami N, Nikaido SS, Pratt BL, Robertson LM. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1989;45:279. - PubMed
    4. Turek FW. 1994;49:43. ibid. - PubMed
    5. Michel S, Geusz ME, Zaritsky JJ, Block GD. Science. 1993;259:239. - PubMed
    1. Rosbash M, Hall JC. Neuron. 1989;3:387. - PubMed
    2. Takahashi JS. Science. 1992;258:238. - PubMed
    3. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1993;3:301. - PubMed
    4. Young MW, editor. Molecular Genetics of Biological. Rhythms Dekker; New York: 1993.
    1. Hardin PE, Hall JC, Rosbash M. Nature. 1990;343:536. - PubMed
    2. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:11711. - PubMed
    3. Edery I, Rutila JE, Rosbash M. Science. 1994;263:237. - PubMed
    4. Aronson BD, Johnson KA, Loros JJ, Dunlap JC. :1578. ibid. - PubMed
    1. Hall JC. Annu Rev Genet. 1990;24:659. - PubMed
    2. Dunlap JC. Annu Rev Physiol. 1993;55:683. - PubMed
    1. Russell WL, et al. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA. 1979;76:5818. - PMC - PubMed
    2. Hitosumachi S, Carpenter DA, Russell WL. 1985;82:6619. ibid. - PMC - PubMed
    3. Rinchik EM. Trends Genet. 1991;7:15. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources