Genetic bottlenecks and population passages cause profound fitness differences in RNA viruses - PubMed (original) (raw)

Comparative Study

Genetic bottlenecks and population passages cause profound fitness differences in RNA viruses

D K Clarke et al. J Virol. 1993 Jan.

Abstract

Repeated clone-to-clone (genetic bottleneck) passages of an RNA phage and vesicular stomatitis virus have been shown previously to result in loss of fitness due to Muller's ratchet. We now demonstrate that Muller's ratchet also operates when genetic bottleneck passages are carried out at 37 rather than 32 degrees C. Thus, these fitness losses do not depend on growth of temperature-sensitive (ts) mutants at lowered temperatures. We also demonstrate that during repeated genetic bottleneck passages, accumulation of deleterious mutations does occur in a stepwise (ratchet-like) manner as originally proposed by Muller. One selected clone which had undergone significant loss of fitness after only 20 genetic bottleneck passages was passaged again in clone-to-clone series. Additional large losses of fitness were observed in five of nine independent bottleneck series; the relative fitnesses of the other four series remained close to the starting fitness. In sharp contrast, when the same selected clone was transferred 20 more times as large populations (10(5) to 10(6) PFU transferred at each passage), significant increases in fitness were observed in all eight passage series. Finally, we selected several clones which had undergone extreme losses of fitness during 20 bottleneck passages. When these low-fitness clones were passaged many times as large virus populations, they always regained very high relative fitness. We conclude that transfer of large populations of RNA viruses regularly selects those genomes within the quasispecies population which have the highest relative fitness, whereas bottleneck transfers have a high probability of leading to loss of fitness by random isolation of genomes carrying debilitating mutations. Both phenomena arise from, and underscore, the extreme mutability and variability of RNA viruses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nature. 1964 Mar 7;201:1054-5 - PubMed
    1. Am J Dis Child. 1962 Mar;103:335-40 - PubMed
    1. Bacteriol Rev. 1966 Sep;30(3):576-88 - PubMed
    1. Bacteriol Rev. 1966 Sep;30(3):517-29 - PubMed
    1. Bacteriol Rev. 1966 Sep;30(3):571-2 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources