How to make a kin selection model - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 1996 May 7;180(1):27-37.
doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0075.
Affiliations
- PMID: 8763356
- DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0075
How to make a kin selection model
P D Taylor et al. J Theor Biol. 1996.
Abstract
Kin selection arguments, based on Hamilton's (1964) concept of inclusive fitness, provide a powerful heuristic and can therefore give us valuable insights into the different pathways through which natural selection acts. But their formulation can be quite tricky, requiring as they do, a close accounting of all the fitness effects of a particular item of behaviour. Here we propose a "direct fitness" formulation of inclusive fitness which often has a more straightforward derivation. Our method finds ESS trait values by the standard optimization techniques of simple differentiation plus two additional steps. First, slopes of group phenotype on individual genotype arise naturally during differentiation, and these slopes are replaced by coefficients of relatedness. Second, when behaviours influence different classes such as age, sex of recipient, or other life history components of fitness, the fitness effects on each component are weighted by reproductive value. We illustrate this technique first in a homogeneous population, with examples of group competition and partial dispersal behaviour, and then in a class-structured population, with examples of sex allocation and altruism between age classes.
Similar articles
- Direct fitness or inclusive fitness: how shall we model kin selection?
Taylor PD, Wild G, Gardner A. Taylor PD, et al. J Evol Biol. 2007 Jan;20(1):301-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01196.x. J Evol Biol. 2007. PMID: 17210023 - Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. III. Social evolution.
McGlothlin JW, Moore AJ, Wolf JB, Brodie ED 3rd. McGlothlin JW, et al. Evolution. 2010 Sep;64(9):2558-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01012.x. Evolution. 2010. PMID: 20394666 - From inclusive fitness to fixation probability in homogeneous structured populations.
Taylor PD, Day T, Wild G. Taylor PD, et al. J Theor Biol. 2007 Nov 7;249(1):101-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.07.006. Epub 2007 Jul 18. J Theor Biol. 2007. PMID: 17727893 - The group selection controversy.
Leigh EG Jr. Leigh EG Jr. J Evol Biol. 2010 Jan;23(1):6-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01876.x. Epub 2009 Nov 26. J Evol Biol. 2010. PMID: 20002254 Review. - Altruism, spite, and greenbeards.
West SA, Gardner A. West SA, et al. Science. 2010 Mar 12;327(5971):1341-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1178332. Science. 2010. PMID: 20223978 Review.
Cited by
- Two principles of success.
Frank SA. Frank SA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Oct;121(40):e2417410121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2417410121. Epub 2024 Sep 19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024. PMID: 39298476 No abstract available. - Kin selection theory and the design of cooperative crops.
Biernaskie JM. Biernaskie JM. Evol Appl. 2022 Jun 14;15(10):1555-1564. doi: 10.1111/eva.13418. eCollection 2022 Oct. Evol Appl. 2022. PMID: 36330299 Free PMC article. - Linked selection and the evolution of altruism in family-structured populations.
Thomson L, Espinosa DP, Brandvain Y, Van Cleve J. Thomson L, et al. Ecol Evol. 2024 Feb 16;14(2):e10980. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10980. eCollection 2024 Feb. Ecol Evol. 2024. PMID: 38371869 Free PMC article. - Joint evolution of multiple social traits: a kin selection analysis.
Brown SP, Taylor PD. Brown SP, et al. Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Feb 7;277(1680):415-22. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1480. Epub 2009 Oct 14. Proc Biol Sci. 2010. PMID: 19828549 Free PMC article. - Honest signaling and the double counting of inclusive fitness.
Levin SR, Caro SM, Griffin AS, West SA. Levin SR, et al. Evol Lett. 2019 Sep 4;3(5):428-433. doi: 10.1002/evl3.138. eCollection 2019 Oct. Evol Lett. 2019. PMID: 31636937 Free PMC article.