Differences in crossover frequency and distribution among three sibling species of Drosophila - PubMed (original) (raw)
Differences in crossover frequency and distribution among three sibling species of Drosophila
J R True et al. Genetics. 1996 Feb.
Abstract
Comparisons of the genetic and cytogenetic maps of three sibling species of Drosophila reveal marked differences in the frequency and cumulative distribution of crossovers during meiosis. The maps for two of these species, Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans, have previously been described, while this report presents new map data for D. mauritiana, obtained using a set of P element markers. A genetic map covering nearly the entire genome was constructed by estimating the recombination fraction for each pair of adjacent inserts. The P-based genetic map of mauritiana is approximately 1.8 times longer than the standard melanogaster map. It appears that mauritiana has higher recombination along the entire length of each chromosome, but the difference is greates in centromere-proximal regions of the autosomes. The mauritiana autosomes show little or no centromeric recombinational suppression, a characteristic that is prominent in melanogaster. D. simulans appears to be intermediate both in terms of total map length and intensity of the autosomal centromeric effect. These interspecific differences in recombination have important evolutionary implications for DNA sequence organization and variability. In particular, mauritiana is expected to differ from melanogaster in patterns and amounts of sequence variation and transposon insertions.
Similar articles
- A reanalysis of protein polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster, D. simulans, D. sechellia and D. mauritiana: effects of population size and selection.
Morton RA, Choudhary M, Cariou ML, Singh RS. Morton RA, et al. Genetica. 2004 Mar;120(1-3):101-14. doi: 10.1023/b:gene.0000017634.17098.aa. Genetica. 2004. PMID: 15088651 - DNA sequence variation and the recombinational landscape in Drosophila pseudoobscura: a study of the second chromosome.
Hamblin MT, Aquadro CF. Hamblin MT, et al. Genetics. 1999 Oct;153(2):859-69. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.2.859. Genetics. 1999. PMID: 10511563 Free PMC article. - The rosy region of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. I. Contrasting levels of naturally occurring DNA restriction map variation and divergence.
Aquadro CF, Lado KM, Noon WA. Aquadro CF, et al. Genetics. 1988 Aug;119(4):875-88. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.4.875. Genetics. 1988. PMID: 2900794 Free PMC article. - The evolutionary genetics of the hobo transposable element in the Drosophila melanogaster complex.
Periquet G, Lemeunier F, Bigot Y, Hamelin MH, Bazin C, Ladevèze V, Eeken J, Galindo MI, Pascual L, Boussy I. Periquet G, et al. Genetica. 1994;93(1-3):79-90. doi: 10.1007/BF01435241. Genetica. 1994. PMID: 7813919 Review. - The absence of crossovers on chromosome 4 in Drosophila melanogaster: Imperfection or interesting exception?
Hartmann MA, Sekelsky J. Hartmann MA, et al. Fly (Austin). 2017 Oct 2;11(4):253-259. doi: 10.1080/19336934.2017.1321181. Epub 2017 Apr 20. Fly (Austin). 2017. PMID: 28426351 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- Genomic Diversity Illuminates the Environmental Adaptation of Drosophila suzukii.
Feng S, DeGrey SP, Guédot C, Schoville SD, Pool JE. Feng S, et al. Genome Biol Evol. 2024 Sep 3;16(9):evae195. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evae195. Genome Biol Evol. 2024. PMID: 39235033 Free PMC article. - Analysis of meiotic recombination in Drosophila simulans shows no evidence of an interchromosomal effect.
Man B, Kim E, Vadlakonda A, Stern DL, Crown KN. Man B, et al. Genetics. 2024 Aug 7;227(4):iyae084. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyae084. Genetics. 2024. PMID: 38762892 Free PMC article. - The genomic distribution of transposable elements is driven by spatially variable purifying selection.
Langmüller AM, Nolte V, Dolezal M, Schlötterer C. Langmüller AM, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023 Sep 22;51(17):9203-9213. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad635. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023. PMID: 37560917 Free PMC article. - Variation in mutation, recombination, and transposition rates in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.
Wang Y, McNeil P, Abdulazeez R, Pascual M, Johnston SE, Keightley PD, Obbard DJ. Wang Y, et al. Genome Res. 2023 Apr;33(4):587-598. doi: 10.1101/gr.277383.122. Epub 2023 Apr 10. Genome Res. 2023. PMID: 37037625 Free PMC article. - The Linkage-Disequilibrium and Recombinational Landscape in Daphnia pulex.
Lynch M, Ye Z, Urban L, Maruki T, Wei W. Lynch M, et al. Genome Biol Evol. 2022 Nov 4;14(11):evac145. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evac145. Genome Biol Evol. 2022. PMID: 36170345 Free PMC article.
References
- Int Rev Cytol. 1979;58:1-114 - PubMed
- Genetics. 1991 Jul;128(3):607-17 - PubMed
- Genetics. 1987 Jan;115(1):129-40 - PubMed
- Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23-35 - PubMed
- Genet Res. 1992 Oct;60(2):103-14 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases