Characterization of glycosylated Gag expressed by a neurovirulent murine leukemia virus: identification of differences in processing in vitro and in vivo - PubMed (original) (raw)

Characterization of glycosylated Gag expressed by a neurovirulent murine leukemia virus: identification of differences in processing in vitro and in vivo

R Fujisawa et al. J Virol. 1997 Jul.

Abstract

The neuroinvasiveness of a chimeric murine retrovirus, CasFrKP (KP), is dependent on the expression of glycosylated Gag (gp85gag). This viral protein is the product of alternate translation initiation 88 codons upstream of and in frame with the initiation codon of pr65gag, the precursor of the viral core proteins. Although expression of glycosylated Gag affects virus spread in the spleen, it appears not to affect virus spread in vitro in fibroblast cell lines (J. L. Portis et al., J. Virol. 68:3879-3887, 1994). The differential effects of this protein in vitro and in vivo have not been explained, and its function is unknown. We have here compared the in vitro processing of this molecule with that expressed in spleens of infected mice. In vitro, gp85gag was cleaved near the middle of the molecule, releasing the C-terminal half (containing capsid and nucleocapsid domains of pr65gag) as a secreted glycoprotein. The N-terminal half of the protein was associated with the plasma membrane as a approximately 55-kDa glycoprotein bearing the matrix domain of pr65gag as well as the N-terminal 88 residue L domain. This processing scheme was also observed in vivo, although two differences were seen. There were differences in N-linked glycosylation of the secreted form of the protein expressed in the spleen. In addition, whereas the membrane-associated species assumed the orientation of a type II integral membrane protein (N(cyto) C(exo)) in fibroblasts in vitro, a subpopulation of spleen cells was detected in which the N terminus of the protein was exposed at the cell surface. These results suggest that the differential effects of glycosylated Gag expression in vivo and in vitro may be related to differences in posttranslational processing of the protein.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Virology. 1981 Jul 15;112(1):131-44 - PubMed
    1. Virology. 1978 Dec;91(2):481-6 - PubMed
    1. J Virol. 1983 May;46(2):538-46 - PubMed
    1. Virology. 1983 May;127(1):134-48 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Oct;80(19):5965-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources