Axil, a member of the Axin family, interacts with both glycogen synthase kinase 3beta and beta-catenin and inhibits axis formation of Xenopus embryos - PubMed (original) (raw)

Comparative Study

Axil, a member of the Axin family, interacts with both glycogen synthase kinase 3beta and beta-catenin and inhibits axis formation of Xenopus embryos

H Yamamoto et al. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 May.

Abstract

Using a yeast two-hybrid method, we identified a novel protein which interacts with glycogen synthase kinase 3beta (GSK-3beta). This protein had 44% amino acid identity with Axin, a negative regulator of the Wnt signaling pathway. We designated this protein Axil for Axin like. Like Axin, Axil ventralized Xenopus embryos and inhibited Xwnt8-induced Xenopus axis duplication. Axil was phosphorylated by GSK-3beta. Axil bound not only to GSK-3beta but also to beta-catenin, and the GSK-3beta-binding site of Axil was distinct from the beta-catenin-binding site. Furthermore, Axil enhanced GSK-3beta-dependent phosphorylation of beta-catenin. These results indicate that Axil negatively regulates the Wnt signaling pathway by mediating GSK-3beta-dependent phosphorylation of beta-catenin, thereby inhibiting axis formation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1

FIG. 1

Structure of Axil. (A) Amino acid sequence of Axil. Identical residues in Axil and rAxin are denoted by a black background. The RGS homologous and Dsh homologous domains are boxed. (B) Northern blot analysis of Axil. Total RNAs (20 μg/lane) of various rat tissues were probed with cDNA encoding Axil(1-148). The positions of 28S and 18S ribosomal RNAs are indicated. The arrowhead indicates the positions of Axil mRNA. The results shown are representative of two independent experiments.

FIG. 2

FIG. 2

Effect of Axil on axis formation of Xenopus embryos. (A and B) Dorsal injection of Axil mRNA. The embryo has no head region (DAI = 1) (A) or has microcephaly (DAI = 3) (B). (C) Ventral injection of Axil mRNA. (D) Control injection of Xglobin mRNA. Embryos were evaluated at the tail bud stage, and examples are shown.

FIG. 3

FIG. 3

Interaction of Axil with GSK-3β. (A) Interaction of Axil with endogenous GSK-3β in COS cells. The lysates (20 μg of protein) of COS cells expressing Myc-Axil were probed with the anti-Myc and anti-GSK-3β antibodies (lane 1). The same lysates (500 μg of protein) were immunoprecipitated with the anti-Myc antibody, and the immunoprecipitates were probed with the anti-Myc and anti-GSK-3β antibodies (lane 3). The lysates of COS cells transfected with empty vectors were used as controls (lanes 2 and 4). (B) Requirement of kinase activity of GSK-3β for its interaction with Axil. Myc-Axil was coexpressed with wild-type HA–GSK-3β (lanes 1 and 3) or HA–GSK-3βK85M (lanes 2 and 4) in COS cells, and the lysates were probed with the anti-Myc and anti-HA antibodies (lanes 1 and 2) or immunoprecipitated with the anti-HA antibody. The immunoprecipitates were then probed with the anti-Myc and anti-HA antibodies (lanes 3 and 4). IP, immunoprecipitation; Ab, antibody; Ig, immunoglobulin; WT, wild type HA–GSK-3β; 85M, HA–GSK-3βK85M. The arrows, small arrowhead, and large arrowhead indicate the positions of Myc-Axil, endogenous GSK-3β, and HA–GSK-3β or HA–GSK-3βK85M, respectively. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments.

FIG. 4

FIG. 4

Phosphorylation of Axil by GSK-3β. (A) Autoradiography. Myc-Axil immunoprecipitated from COS cell lysates (250 μg of protein) was incubated with (lane 2) or without (lane 1) GST–GSK-3β (100 ng of protein) for 20 min, and the samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. The arrow and arrowhead indicate the positions of Myc-Axil and GST–GSK-3β, respectively. (B) Time course. Myc-Axil immunoprecipitated from COS cell lysates was incubated with (•) or without (○) GST–GSK-3β (100 ng of protein) for the indicated periods of time. (C) Dose dependency. Myc-Axil was incubated with the indicated amounts of GST–GSK-3β for 20 min. The results shown are representative of four independent experiments.

FIG. 5

FIG. 5

Interaction of Axil with β-catenin in intact cells (A) and in vitro (B). (A) The lysates (20 μg of protein) of COS cells expressing Myc-Axil were probed with the anti-Myc and anti-β-catenin antibodies (lane 1). The same lysates (500 μg of protein) were immunoprecipitated with the anti-Myc antibody, and the immunoprecipitates were probed with the anti-Myc and anti-β-catenin antibodies (lane 3). The lysates of COS cells transfected with empty vectors were used as controls (lanes 2 and 4). (B) GST–β-catenin(full length) (lane 1), GST–N-terminal β-catenin (lane 2), and GST–C-terminal β-catenin (lane 3) (10 pmol each) were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie brilliant blue staining. After the lysates (500 μg of protein) of COS cells expressing Myc-Axil were incubated with GST–β-catenin (lane 4), GST–N-terminal β-catenin (lane 5), and GST–C-terminal β-catenin (lane 6) (50 pmol each), β-catenin and its deletion mutants were precipitated with glutathione Sepharose 4B. The precipitates were probed with the anti-Myc antibody. IP, immunoprecipitation; Ab, antibody; Ig, immunoglobulin; full, GST–β-catenin(full length); N, GST–N-terminal β-catenin; C, GST–C-terminal β-catenin. The arrows and arrowhead indicate the positions of Myc-Axil and endogenous β-catenin, respectively. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments.

FIG. 6

FIG. 6

Complex formation of GSK-3β, Axil, and β-catenin. (A) Complex formation in intact cells. The lysates (20 μg of protein) of COS cells expressing HA–GSK-3β and Myc-Axil (lanes 1 and 3) and HA–GSK-3β alone (lanes 2 and 4) were probed with the anti-Myc, anti-β-catenin, and anti-HA antibodies (lanes 1 and 2). The same lysates (500 μg of protein) were immunoprecipitated with the anti-HA antibody, and the immunoprecipitates were probed with the anti-Myc, anti-β-catenin, and anti-HA antibodies (lanes 3 and 4). IP, immunoprecipitation, Ab, antibody; Ig, immunoglobulin. The arrow, large arrowhead, and small arrowhead indicate the positions of Myc-Axil, endogenous β-catenin, and HA–GSK-3β, respectively. (B) Deletion mutants of Axil. The hatched and empty boxes indicate the RGS and Dsh homologous domains, respectively. (C) Expression of Axil deletion mutants and their interaction with GSK-3β and β-catenin. The lysates (20 μg of protein) of COS cells expressing Myc-Axil(full length) (lane 1), Myc-Axil(1-670) (lane 2), Myc-Axil(682-838) (lane 3), Myc-Axil(1-265) (lane 4), and Myc-Axil(265-483) (lane 5) were probed with the anti-Myc antibody (left panel). The same lysates (500 to 1,000 μg of protein) (lanes 6 to 10) were immunoprecipitated with the anti-Myc antibody, and the immunoprecipitates were probed with the anti-GSK-3β and anti-β-catenin antibodies (right panel). The small and large arrowheads indicate the positions of endogenous GSK-3β and β-catenin, respectively. (D) Different binding sites of Axil for GSK-3β and β-catenin. After GST–GSK-3β (lanes 1 to 4) and GST–β-catenin (lanes 5 to 8) (8 pmol each) were incubated with MBP-Axil(265-483) (lanes 1 and 5), MBP-Axil(265-412) (lanes 2 and 6), MBP-Axil(412-483) (lanes 3 and 7), or MBP (lanes 4 and 8) (2 pmol each) immobilized on amylose resin, MBPs fused to proteins were precipitated by centrifugation. The precipitates were probed with the anti-GSK-3β and anti-β-catenin antibodies. The small and large arrowheads indicate the positions of GST–GSK-3β and GST–β-catenin, respectively. (E) Phosphorylation of Axil(265-483) by GSK-3β. MBP-Axil(265-483) (200 ng of protein) was incubated with (lane 2) or without (lane 1) GST–GSK-3β (100 ng of protein) for 30 min. The arrow indicates the position of MBP-Axil(265-483). The results shown are representative of three independent experiments.

FIG. 7

FIG. 7

Kinetics for the phosphorylation of Axil(265-483) by GSK-3β. (A) Time course. MBP-Axil(265-483) (200 ng of protein) purified from E. coli was incubated with (•) or without (○) GST–GSK-3β (100 ng of protein) for the indicated periods of time. (B) Dose dependency. The indicated concentrations of MBP-Axil(265-483) were incubated with GST–GSK-3β (100 ng of protein) for 20 min. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments.

FIG. 8

FIG. 8

Phosphorylation of β-catenin by GSK-3β in the presence of Axil. (A) Effect of MBP-Axil(265-483) on GSK-3β-dependent phosphorylation of β-catenin. GST–β-catenin (2 μg of protein) was incubated with GST–GSK-3β (600 ng of protein) in the presence of MBP-Axil(265-483) (lane 3), MBP-Axil(265-412) (lane 4), MBP-Axil(412-483) (lane 5), or MBP (lane 6) (200 ng of protein each) for 30 min. As a control, GST–β-catenin was incubated with (lane 2) or without (lane 1) GST–GSK-3β. (Upper panel) Autoradiography is shown. (Lower panel) The radioactivities incorporated into GST–β-catenin were counted and the stoichiometry of the phosphorylation was calculated. (B) Effect of full-length Axil on GSK-3β-dependent phosphorylation of β-catenin. The indicated amounts of GST–N-terminal β-catenin were incubated with GST–GSK-3β (400 ng of protein) in the presence (lanes 4 to 6) and absence (lanes 1 to 3) of MBP-Axil (160 ng of protein). GST–N-β-catenin, GST–N-terminal β-catenin. (C) Effect of Axil on GSK-3β activity. GST–GSK-3β (400 ng of protein) was incubated with 50 μM GSK peptide 1 in the presence of the indicated amounts of MBP-Axil(265-483) (•) or MBP-Axil (○). The results shown are representative of five independent experiments.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aberle H, Bauer A, Stappert J, Kispert A, Kemler R. β-Catenin is a target for the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. EMBO J. 1997;16:3797–3804. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Behrens J, von Kries J P, Kühl M, Bruhn L, Wedlich D, Grosschedl R, Birchmeier W. Functional interaction of β-catenin with the transcription factor LEF-1. Nature. 1996;382:638–642. - PubMed
    1. Bhanot P, Brink M, Samos C H, Hsieh J C, Wang Y, Macke J P, Andrew D, Nathans J, Nusse R. A new member of the frizzled family from Drosophila functions as a Wingless receptor. Nature. 1996;382:225–230. - PubMed
    1. Bradford M M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–254. - PubMed
    1. Cadigan K M, Nusse R. Wnt Meeting 1996. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997;1332:R1–R5. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources