Human albumin administration in critically ill patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials - PubMed (original) (raw)

Meta-Analysis

Human albumin administration in critically ill patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Cochrane Injuries Group Albumin Reviewers. BMJ. 1998.

Abstract

Objective: To quantify effect on mortality of administering human albumin or plasma protein fraction during management of critically ill patients.

Design: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials comparing administration of albumin or plasma protein fraction with no administration or with administration of crystalloid solution in critically ill patients with hypovolaemia, burns, or hypoalbuminaemia.

Subjects: 30 randomised controlled trials including 1419 randomised patients.

Main outcome measure: Mortality from all causes at end of follow up for each trial.

Results: For each patient category the risk of death in the albumin treated group was higher than in the comparison group. For hypovolaemia the relative risk of death after albumin administration was 1.46 (95% confidence interval 0.97 to 2.22), for burns the relative risk was 2.40 (1.11 to 5.19), and for hypoalbuminaemia it was 1.69 (1.07 to 2.67). Pooled relative risk of death with albumin administration was 1.68 (1.26 to 2.23). Pooled difference in the risk of death with albumin was 6% (95% confidence interval 3% to 9%) with a fixed effects model. These data suggest that for every 17 critically ill patients treated with albumin there is one additional death.

Conclusions: There is no evidence that albumin administration reduces mortality in critically ill patients with hypovolaemia, burns, or hypoalbuminaemia and a strong suggestion that it may increase mortality. These data suggest that use of human albumin in critically ill patients should be urgently reviewed and that it should not be used outside the context of rigorously conducted, randomised controlled trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Fixed effects model of relative risks (95% confidence interval) of death associated with intervention (fluid resuscitation with albumin or plasma protein fraction) compared with control (no albumin or plasma protein fraction or resuscitation with a crystalloid solution) in critically ill patients

Figure 2

Figure 2

Funnel plot for the 24 trials in which deaths occurred and that were used in systematic review

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goldwasser P, Feldman J. Association of serum albumin and mortality risk. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:693–703. - PubMed
    1. ABPI compendium of data sheets and summaries of product characteristics 1998-99. London: Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industries; 1998.
    1. McClelland DB. Human albumin solutions. BMJ. 1990;300:35–37. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Medical Editors’ Trial Amnesty; The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Oxford: Update Software; 1998. In: The Cochrane Library. Updated quarterly.
    1. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995;273:408–412. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources