High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays - PubMed (original) (raw)
Comparative Study
doi: 10.1038/2524.
R Segraves, D Sudar, S Clark, I Poole, D Kowbel, C Collins, W L Kuo, C Chen, Y Zhai, S H Dairkee, B M Ljung, J W Gray, D G Albertson
Affiliations
- PMID: 9771718
- DOI: 10.1038/2524
Comparative Study
High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays
D Pinkel et al. Nat Genet. 1998 Oct.
Abstract
Gene dosage variations occur in many diseases. In cancer, deletions and copy number increases contribute to alterations in the expression of tumour-suppressor genes and oncogenes, respectively. Developmental abnormalities, such as Down, Prader Willi, Angelman and Cri du Chat syndromes, result from gain or loss of one copy of a chromosome or chromosomal region. Thus, detection and mapping of copy number abnormalities provide an approach for associating aberrations with disease phenotype and for localizing critical genes. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was developed for genome-wide analysis of DNA sequence copy number in a single experiment. In CGH, differentially labelled total genomic DNA from a 'test' and a 'reference' cell population are cohybridized to normal metaphase chromosomes, using blocking DNA to suppress signals from repetitive sequences. The resulting ratio of the fluorescence intensities at a location on the 'cytogenetic map', provided by the chromosomes, is approximately proportional to the ratio of the copy numbers of the corresponding DNA sequences in the test and reference genomes. CGH has been broadly applied to human and mouse malignancies. The use of metaphase chromosomes, however, limits detection of events involving small regions (of less than 20 Mb) of the genome, resolution of closely spaced aberrations and linking ratio changes to genomic/genetic markers. Therefore, more laborious locus-by-locus techniques have been required for higher resolution studies. Hybridization to an array of mapped sequences instead of metaphase chromosomes could overcome the limitations of conventional CGH (ref. 6) if adequate performance could be achieved. Copy number would be related to the test/reference fluorescence ratio on the array targets, and genomic resolution could be determined by the map distance between the targets, or by the length of the cloned DNA segments. We describe here our implementation of array CGH. We demonstrate its ability to measure copy number with high precision in the human genome, and to analyse clinical specimens by obtaining new information on chromosome 20 aberrations in breast cancer.
Similar articles
- Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer.
Kloth JN, Oosting J, van Wezel T, Szuhai K, Knijnenburg J, Gorter A, Kenter GG, Fleuren GJ, Jordanova ES. Kloth JN, et al. BMC Genomics. 2007 Feb 20;8:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-53. BMC Genomics. 2007. PMID: 17311676 Free PMC article. - Global search for chromosomal abnormalities in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast using array-comparative genomic hybridization.
Somiari SB, Shriver CD, He J, Parikh K, Jordan R, Hooke J, Hu H, Deyarmin B, Lubert S, Malicki L, Heckman C, Somiari RI. Somiari SB, et al. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2004 Dec;155(2):108-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2004.02.023. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2004. PMID: 15571796 - Comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of changes in DNA copy number in multiple myeloma.
Rao PH. Rao PH. Methods Mol Med. 2005;113:71-83. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-916-8:71. Methods Mol Med. 2005. PMID: 15968096 - Comparative genomic hybridization.
Pinkel D, Albertson DG. Pinkel D, et al. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2005;6:331-54. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.6.080604.162140. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2005. PMID: 16124865 Review. - Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization and its applications in human genetics.
Oostlander AE, Meijer GA, Ylstra B. Oostlander AE, et al. Clin Genet. 2004 Dec;66(6):488-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00322.x. Clin Genet. 2004. PMID: 15521975 Review.
Cited by
- Improved Detection and Characterization of Copy Number Variations Among Diverse Pig Breeds by Array CGH.
Wang J, Jiang J, Wang H, Kang H, Zhang Q, Liu JF. Wang J, et al. G3 (Bethesda). 2015 Apr 22;5(6):1253-61. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.018473. G3 (Bethesda). 2015. PMID: 25908567 Free PMC article. - TumorNext: A comprehensive tumor profiling assay that incorporates high resolution copy number analysis and germline status to improve testing accuracy.
Gray PN, Vuong H, Tsai P, Lu HM, Mu W, Hsuan V, Hoo J, Shah S, Uyeda L, Fox S, Patel H, Janicek M, Brown S, Dobrea L, Wagman L, Plimack E, Mehra R, Golemis EA, Bilusic M, Zibelman M, Elliott A. Gray PN, et al. Oncotarget. 2016 Oct 18;7(42):68206-68228. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11910. Oncotarget. 2016. PMID: 27626691 Free PMC article. - The detection and implication of genome instability in cancer.
Pikor L, Thu K, Vucic E, Lam W. Pikor L, et al. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2013 Dec;32(3-4):341-52. doi: 10.1007/s10555-013-9429-5. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2013. PMID: 23633034 Free PMC article. Review. - RefCNV: Identification of Gene-Based Copy Number Variants Using Whole Exome Sequencing.
Chang LC, Das B, Lih CJ, Si H, Camalier CE, McGregor PM 3rd, Polley E. Chang LC, et al. Cancer Inform. 2016 Apr 27;15:65-71. doi: 10.4137/CIN.S36612. eCollection 2016. Cancer Inform. 2016. PMID: 27147817 Free PMC article. - Application of microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal and postnatal settings: three case reports.
Liu J, Bernier F, Lauzon J, Lowry RB, Chernos J. Liu J, et al. Genet Res Int. 2011;2011:976398. doi: 10.4061/2011/976398. Epub 2011 Aug 7. Genet Res Int. 2011. PMID: 22567372 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous