A discordant-sibship test for disequilibrium and linkage: no need for parental data - PubMed (original) (raw)
Comparative Study
. 1998 Dec;63(6):1886-97.
doi: 10.1086/302137.
Affiliations
- PMID: 9837840
- PMCID: PMC1377659
- DOI: 10.1086/302137
Comparative Study
A discordant-sibship test for disequilibrium and linkage: no need for parental data
S Horvath et al. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Dec.
Abstract
The sibship disequilibrium test (SDT) is designed to detect both linkage in the presence of association and association in the presence of linkage (linkage disequilibrium). The test does not require parental data but requires discordant sibships with at least one affected and one unaffected sibling. The SDT has many desirable properties: it uses all the siblings in the sibship; it remains valid if there are misclassifications of the affectation status; it does not detect spurious associations due to population stratification; asymptotically it has a chi2 distribution under the null hypothesis; and exact P values can be easily computed for a biallelic marker. We show how to extend the SDT to markers with multiple alleles and how to combine families with parents and data from discordant sibships. We discuss the power of the test by presenting sample-size calculations involving a complex disease model, and we present formulas for the asymptotic relative efficiency (which is approximately the ratio of sample sizes) between SDT and the transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) for special family structures. For sib pairs, we compare the SDT to a test proposed both by Curtis and, independently, by Spielman and Ewens. We show that, for discordant sib pairs, the SDT has good power for testing linkage disequilibrium relative both to Curtis's tests and to the TDT using trios comprising an affected sib and its parents. With additional sibs, we show that the SDT can be more powerful than the TDT for testing linkage disequilibrium, especially for disease prevalence >.3.
Comment in
- Combining the sibling disequilibrium test and transmission/disequilibrium test for multiallelic markers.
Curtis D, Miller MB, Sham PC. Curtis D, et al. Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Jun;64(6):1785-6. doi: 10.1086/302421. Am J Hum Genet. 1999. PMID: 10330368 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
- Informative-transmission disequilibrium test (i-TDT): combined linkage and association mapping that includes unaffected offspring as well as affected offspring.
Guo CY, Lunetta KL, DeStefano AL, Ordovas JM, Cupples LA. Guo CY, et al. Genet Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;31(2):115-33. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20195. Genet Epidemiol. 2007. PMID: 17123304 - The transmission/disequilibrium test for linkage on the X chromosome.
Ho GY, Bailey-Wilson JE. Ho GY, et al. Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Mar;66(3):1158-60. doi: 10.1086/302822. Am J Hum Genet. 2000. PMID: 10712228 Free PMC article. - A sibship test for linkage in the presence of association: the sib transmission/disequilibrium test.
Spielman RS, Ewens WJ. Spielman RS, et al. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Feb;62(2):450-8. doi: 10.1086/301714. Am J Hum Genet. 1998. PMID: 9463321 Free PMC article. - Sibship T2 association tests of complex diseases for tightly linked markers.
Fan R, Knapp M. Fan R, et al. Hum Genomics. 2005 Jun;2(2):90-112. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-2-2-90. Hum Genomics. 2005. PMID: 16004725 Free PMC article. Review. - The relative power of family-based and case-control designs for linkage disequilibrium studies of complex human diseases I. DNA pooling.
Risch N, Teng J. Risch N, et al. Genome Res. 1998 Dec;8(12):1273-88. doi: 10.1101/gr.8.12.1273. Genome Res. 1998. PMID: 9872982 Review.
Cited by
- Accounting for linkage in family-based tests of association with missing parental genotypes.
Martin ER, Bass MP, Hauser ER, Kaplan NL. Martin ER, et al. Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Nov;73(5):1016-26. doi: 10.1086/378779. Epub 2003 Oct 9. Am J Hum Genet. 2003. PMID: 14551902 Free PMC article. - Detection of disease genes by use of family data. II. Application to nuclear families.
Tu IP, Balise RR, Whittemore AS. Tu IP, et al. Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Apr;66(4):1341-50. doi: 10.1086/302852. Epub 2000 Mar 29. Am J Hum Genet. 2000. PMID: 10739759 Free PMC article. - Genetic variation in UGT genes modify the associations of NSAIDs with risk of colorectal cancer: colon cancer family registry.
Scherer D, Koepl LM, Poole EM, Balavarca Y, Xiao L, Baron JA, Hsu L, Coghill AE, Campbell PT, Kleinstein SE, Figueiredo JC, Lampe JW, Buck K, Potter JD, Kulmacz RJ, Jenkins MA, Hopper JL, Win AK, Newcomb PA, Ulrich CM, Makar KW. Scherer D, et al. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2014 Jul;53(7):568-78. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22167. Epub 2014 Mar 28. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24677636 Free PMC article. - Genetic association analysis using sibship data: a multilevel model approach.
Zhao Y, Yu H, Zhu Y, Ter-Minassian M, Peng Z, Shen H, Diao N, Chen F. Zhao Y, et al. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031134. Epub 2012 Feb 1. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22312441 Free PMC article.
References
- Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Aug;61(2):439-48 - PubMed
- Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Apr;62(4):950-61 - PubMed
- Biometrics. 1991 Mar;47(1):53-61 - PubMed
- Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Dec;63(6):1915-6 - PubMed
- Ann Hum Genet. 1976 Nov;40(2):231-43 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical