Interactions of polymeric and liposomal gene delivery systems with extracellular glycosaminoglycans: physicochemical and transfection studies - PubMed (original) (raw)

Interactions of polymeric and liposomal gene delivery systems with extracellular glycosaminoglycans: physicochemical and transfection studies

M Ruponen et al. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999.

Free article

Abstract

Complexes of DNA with cationic lipids and cationic polymers are frequently used for gene transfer. Extracellular interactions of the complexes with anionic glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) may interfere with gene transfer. Interactions of GAGs with the carrier-DNA complexes were studied using tests for DNA relaxation (ethidium bromide intercalation), DNA release (electrophoresis), and transfection (pCMVbetaGal transfer into RAA smooth muscle cells). Several cationic lipid formulations (DOTAP, DOTAP/Chol, DOTAP/DOPE, DOTMA/DOPE, DOGS) and cationic polymers (fractured dendrimer, polyethylene imines 25 kDa and 800 kDa, polylysines 20 kDa and 200 kDa) were tested. Polycations condensed DNA more effectively than the monovalent lipids. Hyaluronic acid did not release or relax DNA in any complex, but it inhibited the transfection by some polyvalent systems (PEI, dendrimers, DOGS). Gene transfer by the other carriers was not affected by hyaluronic acid. Sulfated GAGs (heparan sulfate, chondroitin sulfates B and C) completely blocked transfection, except in the case of the liposomes with DOPE. Sulfated GAGs relaxed and released DNA from some complexes, but these events were not prerequisites for the inhibition of transfection. In conclusion, polyvalent delivery systems with endosomal buffering capacity (DOGS, PEI, dendrimer) were most sensitive to the inhibitory effects of GAGs on gene transfer, while fusogenic liposomes (with DOPE) were the most resistant systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources