TorchScript — PyTorch 2.7 documentation (original) (raw)
TorchScript is a way to create serializable and optimizable models from PyTorch code. Any TorchScript program can be saved from a Python process and loaded in a process where there is no Python dependency.
We provide tools to incrementally transition a model from a pure Python program to a TorchScript program that can be run independently from Python, such as in a standalone C++ program. This makes it possible to train models in PyTorch using familiar tools in Python and then export the model via TorchScript to a production environment where Python programs may be disadvantageous for performance and multi-threading reasons.
For a gentle introduction to TorchScript, see the Introduction to TorchScript tutorial.
For an end-to-end example of converting a PyTorch model to TorchScript and running it in C++, see theLoading a PyTorch Model in C++ tutorial.
Creating TorchScript Code¶
script | Script the function. |
---|---|
trace | Trace a function and return an executable or ScriptFunction that will be optimized using just-in-time compilation. |
script_if_tracing | Compiles fn when it is first called during tracing. |
trace_module | Trace a module and return an executable ScriptModule that will be optimized using just-in-time compilation. |
fork | Create an asynchronous task executing func and a reference to the value of the result of this execution. |
wait | Force completion of a torch.jit.Future[T] asynchronous task, returning the result of the task. |
ScriptModule | Wrapper for C++ torch::jit::Module with methods, attributes, and parameters. |
ScriptFunction | Functionally equivalent to a ScriptModule, but represents a single function and does not have any attributes or Parameters. |
freeze | Freeze ScriptModule, inline submodules, and attributes as constants. |
optimize_for_inference | Perform a set of optimization passes to optimize a model for the purposes of inference. |
enable_onednn_fusion | Enable or disables onednn JIT fusion based on the parameter enabled. |
onednn_fusion_enabled | Return whether onednn JIT fusion is enabled. |
set_fusion_strategy | Set the type and number of specializations that can occur during fusion. |
strict_fusion | Give errors if not all nodes have been fused in inference, or symbolically differentiated in training. |
save | Save an offline version of this module for use in a separate process. |
load | Load a ScriptModule or ScriptFunction previously saved with torch.jit.save. |
ignore | This decorator indicates to the compiler that a function or method should be ignored and left as a Python function. |
unused | This decorator indicates to the compiler that a function or method should be ignored and replaced with the raising of an exception. |
interface | Decorate to annotate classes or modules of different types. |
isinstance | Provide container type refinement in TorchScript. |
Attribute | This method is a pass-through function that returns value, mostly used to indicate to the TorchScript compiler that the left-hand side expression is a class instance attribute with type of type. |
annotate | Use to give type of the_value in TorchScript compiler. |
Mixing Tracing and Scripting¶
In many cases either tracing or scripting is an easier approach for converting a model to TorchScript. Tracing and scripting can be composed to suit the particular requirements of a part of a model.
Scripted functions can call traced functions. This is particularly useful when you need to use control-flow around a simple feed-forward model. For instance the beam search of a sequence to sequence model will typically be written in script but can call an encoder module generated using tracing.
Example (calling a traced function in script):
import torch
def foo(x, y): return 2 * x + y
traced_foo = torch.jit.trace(foo, (torch.rand(3), torch.rand(3)))
@torch.jit.script def bar(x): return traced_foo(x, x)
Traced functions can call script functions. This is useful when a small part of a model requires some control-flow even though most of the model is just a feed-forward network. Control-flow inside of a script function called by a traced function is preserved correctly.
Example (calling a script function in a traced function):
import torch
@torch.jit.script def foo(x, y): if x.max() > y.max(): r = x else: r = y return r
def bar(x, y, z): return foo(x, y) + z
traced_bar = torch.jit.trace(bar, (torch.rand(3), torch.rand(3), torch.rand(3)))
This composition also works for nn.Module
s as well, where it can be used to generate a submodule using tracing that can be called from the methods of a script module.
Example (using a traced module):
import torch import torchvision
class MyScriptModule(torch.nn.Module): def init(self): super().init() self.means = torch.nn.Parameter(torch.tensor([103.939, 116.779, 123.68]) .resize_(1, 3, 1, 1)) self.resnet = torch.jit.trace(torchvision.models.resnet18(), torch.rand(1, 3, 224, 224))
def forward(self, input):
return self.resnet(input - self.means)
my_script_module = torch.jit.script(MyScriptModule())
TorchScript Language¶
TorchScript is a statically typed subset of Python, so many Python features apply directly to TorchScript. See the full TorchScript Language Reference for details.
Built-in Functions and Modules¶
TorchScript supports the use of most PyTorch functions and many Python built-ins. See TorchScript Builtins for a full reference of supported functions.
PyTorch Functions and Modules¶
TorchScript supports a subset of the tensor and neural network functions that PyTorch provides. Most methods on Tensor as well as functions in the torch
namespace, all functions in torch.nn.functional
and most modules from torch.nn
are supported in TorchScript.
See TorchScript Unsupported PyTorch Constructs for a list of unsupported PyTorch functions and modules.
Python Functions and Modules¶
Many of Python’s built-in functions are supported in TorchScript. The math module is also supported (see math Module for details), but no other Python modules (built-in or third party) are supported.
Debugging¶
Disable JIT for Debugging¶
PYTORCH_JIT¶
Setting the environment variable PYTORCH_JIT=0
will disable all script and tracing annotations. If there is hard-to-debug error in one of your TorchScript models, you can use this flag to force everything to run using native Python. Since TorchScript (scripting and tracing) is disabled with this flag, you can use tools like pdb
to debug the model code. For example:
@torch.jit.script def scripted_fn(x : torch.Tensor): for i in range(12): x = x + x return x
def fn(x): x = torch.neg(x) import pdb; pdb.set_trace() return scripted_fn(x)
traced_fn = torch.jit.trace(fn, (torch.rand(4, 5),)) traced_fn(torch.rand(3, 4))
Debugging this script with pdb
works except for when we invoke the@torch.jit.script function. We can globally disable JIT, so that we can call the @torch.jit.scriptfunction as a normal Python function and not compile it. If the above script is called disable_jit_example.py
, we can invoke it like so:
$ PYTORCH_JIT=0 python disable_jit_example.py
and we will be able to step into the @torch.jit.script function as a normal Python function. To disable the TorchScript compiler for a specific function, see@torch.jit.ignore.
Inspecting Code¶
TorchScript provides a code pretty-printer for all ScriptModule instances. This pretty-printer gives an interpretation of the script method’s code as valid Python syntax. For example:
@torch.jit.script def foo(len): # type: (int) -> torch.Tensor rv = torch.zeros(3, 4) for i in range(len): if i < 10: rv = rv - 1.0 else: rv = rv + 1.0 return rv
print(foo.code)
A ScriptModule with a single forward
method will have an attributecode
, which you can use to inspect the ScriptModule’s code. If the ScriptModule has more than one method, you will need to access.code
on the method itself and not the module. We can inspect the code of a method named foo
on a ScriptModule by accessing .foo.code
. The example above produces this output:
def foo(len: int) -> Tensor: rv = torch.zeros([3, 4], dtype=None, layout=None, device=None, pin_memory=None) rv0 = rv for i in range(len): if torch.lt(i, 10): rv1 = torch.sub(rv0, 1., 1) else: rv1 = torch.add(rv0, 1., 1) rv0 = rv1 return rv0
This is TorchScript’s compilation of the code for the forward
method. You can use this to ensure TorchScript (tracing or scripting) has captured your model code correctly.
Interpreting Graphs¶
TorchScript also has a representation at a lower level than the code pretty- printer, in the form of IR graphs.
TorchScript uses a static single assignment (SSA) intermediate representation (IR) to represent computation. The instructions in this format consist of ATen (the C++ backend of PyTorch) operators and other primitive operators, including control flow operators for loops and conditionals. As an example:
@torch.jit.script def foo(len): # type: (int) -> torch.Tensor rv = torch.zeros(3, 4) for i in range(len): if i < 10: rv = rv - 1.0 else: rv = rv + 1.0 return rv
print(foo.graph)
graph
follows the same rules described in the Inspecting Code section with regard to forward
method lookup.
The example script above produces the graph:
graph(%len.1 : int): %24 : int = prim::Constantvalue=1 %17 : bool = prim::Constantvalue=1 # test.py:10:5 %12 : bool? = prim::Constant() %10 : Device? = prim::Constant() %6 : int? = prim::Constant() %1 : int = prim::Constantvalue=3 # test.py:9:22 %2 : int = prim::Constantvalue=4 # test.py:9:25 %20 : int = prim::Constantvalue=10 # test.py:11:16 %23 : float = prim::Constantvalue=1 # test.py:12:23 %4 : int[] = prim::ListConstruct(%1, %2) %rv.1 : Tensor = aten::zeros(%4, %6, %6, %10, %12) # test.py:9:10 %rv : Tensor = prim::Loop(%len.1, %17, %rv.1) # test.py:10:5 block0(%i.1 : int, %rv.14 : Tensor): %21 : bool = aten::lt(%i.1, %20) # test.py:11:12 %rv.13 : Tensor = prim::If(%21) # test.py:11:9 block0(): %rv.3 : Tensor = aten::sub(%rv.14, %23, %24) # test.py:12:18 -> (%rv.3) block1(): %rv.6 : Tensor = aten::add(%rv.14, %23, %24) # test.py:14:18 -> (%rv.6) -> (%17, %rv.13) return (%rv)
Take the instruction %rv.1 : Tensor = aten::zeros(%4, %6, %6, %10, %12) # test.py:9:10
for example.
%rv.1 : Tensor
means we assign the output to a (unique) value namedrv.1
, that value is ofTensor
type and that we do not know its concrete shape.aten::zeros
is the operator (equivalent totorch.zeros
) and the input list(%4, %6, %6, %10, %12)
specifies which values in scope should be passed as inputs. The schema for built-in functions likeaten::zeros
can be found at Builtin Functions.# test.py:9:10
is the location in the original source file that generated this instruction. In this case, it is a file named test.py, on line 9, and at character 10.
Notice that operators can also have associated blocks
, namely theprim::Loop
and prim::If
operators. In the graph print-out, these operators are formatted to reflect their equivalent source code forms to facilitate easy debugging.
Graphs can be inspected as shown to confirm that the computation described by a ScriptModule is correct, in both automated and manual fashion, as described below.
Tracer¶
Tracing Edge Cases¶
There are some edge cases that exist where the trace of a given Python function/module will not be representative of the underlying code. These cases can include:
- Tracing of control flow that is dependent on inputs (e.g. tensor shapes)
- Tracing of in-place operations of tensor views (e.g. indexing on the left-hand side of an assignment)
Note that these cases may in fact be traceable in the future.
Automatic Trace Checking¶
One way to automatically catch many errors in traces is by using check_inputs
on the torch.jit.trace()
API. check_inputs
takes a list of tuples of inputs that will be used to re-trace the computation and verify the results. For example:
def loop_in_traced_fn(x): result = x[0] for i in range(x.size(0)): result = result * x[i] return result
inputs = (torch.rand(3, 4, 5),) check_inputs = [(torch.rand(4, 5, 6),), (torch.rand(2, 3, 4),)]
traced = torch.jit.trace(loop_in_traced_fn, inputs, check_inputs=check_inputs)
Gives us the following diagnostic information:
ERROR: Graphs differed across invocations! Graph diff:
graph(%x : Tensor) {
%1 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]()
%2 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]()
%result.1 : Tensor = aten::select(%x, %1, %2)
%4 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]()
%5 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]()
%6 : Tensor = aten::select(%x, %4, %5)
%result.2 : Tensor = aten::mul(%result.1, %6)
%8 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]()
%9 : int = prim::Constant[value=1]()
%10 : Tensor = aten::select(%x, %8, %9)
- %result : Tensor = aten::mul(%result.2, %10)
+ %result.3 : Tensor = aten::mul(%result.2, %10)
? ++
%12 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]()
%13 : int = prim::Constant[value=2]()
%14 : Tensor = aten::select(%x, %12, %13)
+ %result : Tensor = aten::mul(%result.3, %14)
+ %16 : int = prim::Constant[value=0]()
+ %17 : int = prim::Constant[value=3]()
+ %18 : Tensor = aten::select(%x, %16, %17)
- %15 : Tensor = aten::mul(%result, %14)
? ^ ^
+ %19 : Tensor = aten::mul(%result, %18)
? ^ ^
- return (%15);
? ^
+ return (%19);
? ^
}
This message indicates to us that the computation differed between when we first traced it and when we traced it with the check_inputs
. Indeed, the loop within the body of loop_in_traced_fn
depends on the shape of the input x
, and thus when we try another x
with a different shape, the trace differs.
In this case, data-dependent control flow like this can be captured usingtorch.jit.script() instead:
def fn(x): result = x[0] for i in range(x.size(0)): result = result * x[i] return result
inputs = (torch.rand(3, 4, 5),) check_inputs = [(torch.rand(4, 5, 6),), (torch.rand(2, 3, 4),)]
scripted_fn = torch.jit.script(fn) print(scripted_fn.graph) #print(str(scripted_fn.graph).strip())
for input_tuple in [inputs] + check_inputs: torch.testing.assert_close(fn(*input_tuple), scripted_fn(*input_tuple))
Which produces:
graph(%x : Tensor) { %5 : bool = prim::Constantvalue=1 %1 : int = prim::Constantvalue=0 %result.1 : Tensor = aten::select(%x, %1, %1) %4 : int = aten::size(%x, %1) %result : Tensor = prim::Loop(%4, %5, %result.1) block0(%i : int, %7 : Tensor) { %10 : Tensor = aten::select(%x, %1, %i) %result.2 : Tensor = aten::mul(%7, %10) -> (%5, %result.2) } return (%result); }
Tracer Warnings¶
The tracer produces warnings for several problematic patterns in traced computation. As an example, take a trace of a function that contains an in-place assignment on a slice (a view) of a Tensor:
def fill_row_zero(x): x[0] = torch.rand(*x.shape[1:2]) return x
traced = torch.jit.trace(fill_row_zero, (torch.rand(3, 4),)) print(traced.graph)
Produces several warnings and a graph which simply returns the input:
fill_row_zero.py:4: TracerWarning: There are 2 live references to the data region being modified when tracing in-place operator copy_ (possibly due to an assignment). This might cause the trace to be incorrect, because all other views that also reference this data will not reflect this change in the trace! On the other hand, if all other views use the same memory chunk, but are disjoint (e.g. are outputs of torch.split), this might still be safe. x[0] = torch.rand(*x.shape[1:2]) fill_row_zero.py:6: TracerWarning: Output nr 1. of the traced function does not match the corresponding output of the Python function. Detailed error: Not within tolerance rtol=1e-05 atol=1e-05 at input[0, 1] (0.09115803241729736 vs. 0.6782537698745728) and 3 other locations (33.00%) traced = torch.jit.trace(fill_row_zero, (torch.rand(3, 4),)) graph(%0 : Float(3, 4)) { return (%0); }
We can fix this by modifying the code to not use the in-place update, but rather build up the result tensor out-of-place with torch.cat
:
def fill_row_zero(x): x = torch.cat((torch.rand(1, *x.shape[1:2]), x[1:2]), dim=0) return x
traced = torch.jit.trace(fill_row_zero, (torch.rand(3, 4),)) print(traced.graph)
Frequently Asked Questions¶
Q: I would like to train a model on GPU and do inference on CPU. What are the best practices?
First convert your model from GPU to CPU and then save it, like so:
cpu_model = gpu_model.cpu() sample_input_cpu = sample_input_gpu.cpu() traced_cpu = torch.jit.trace(cpu_model, sample_input_cpu) torch.jit.save(traced_cpu, "cpu.pt")
traced_gpu = torch.jit.trace(gpu_model, sample_input_gpu) torch.jit.save(traced_gpu, "gpu.pt")
... later, when using the model:
if use_gpu: model = torch.jit.load("gpu.pt") else: model = torch.jit.load("cpu.pt")
model(input)
This is recommended because the tracer may witness tensor creation on a specific device, so casting an already-loaded model may have unexpected effects. Casting the model before saving it ensures that the tracer has the correct device information.
Q: How do I store attributes on a ScriptModule?
Say we have a model like:
import torch
class Model(torch.nn.Module): def init(self): super().init() self.x = 2
def forward(self): return self.x
m = torch.jit.script(Model())
If
Model
is instantiated it will result in a compilation error since the compiler doesn’t know aboutx
. There are 4 ways to inform the compiler of attributes on ScriptModule:1.
nn.Parameter
- Values wrapped innn.Parameter
will work as they do onnn.Module
s2.
register_buffer
- Values wrapped inregister_buffer
will work as they do onnn.Module
s. This is equivalent to an attribute (see 4) of typeTensor
.3. Constants - Annotating a class member as
Final
(or adding it to a list called__constants__
at the class definition level) will mark the contained names as constants. Constants are saved directly in the code of the model. Seebuiltin-constants for details.4. Attributes - Values that are a supported type can be added as mutable attributes. Most types can be inferred but some may need to be specified, seemodule attributes for details.
Q: I would like to trace module’s method but I keep getting this error:
RuntimeError: Cannot insert a Tensor that requires grad as a constant. Consider making it a parameter or input, or detaching the gradient
This error usually means that the method you are tracing uses a module’s parameters and you are passing the module’s method instead of the module instance (e.g.
my_module_instance.forward
vsmy_module_instance
).
- Invoking
trace
with a module’s method captures module parameters (which may require gradients) as constants.- On the other hand, invoking
trace
with module’s instance (e.g.my_module
) creates a new module and correctly copies parameters into the new module, so they can accumulate gradients if required.To trace a specific method on a module, see torch.jit.trace_module
Known Issues¶
If you’re using Sequential
with TorchScript, the inputs of some of the Sequential
submodules may be falsely inferred to beTensor
, even if they’re annotated otherwise. The canonical solution is to subclass nn.Sequential
and redeclare forward
with the input typed correctly.
Appendix¶
Migrating to PyTorch 1.2 Recursive Scripting API¶
This section details the changes to TorchScript in PyTorch 1.2. If you are new to TorchScript you can skip this section. There are two main changes to the TorchScript API with PyTorch 1.2.
1. torch.jit.script will now attempt to recursively compile functions, methods, and classes that it encounters. Once you call torch.jit.script
, compilation is “opt-out”, rather than “opt-in”.
2. torch.jit.script(nn_module_instance)
is now the preferred way to createScriptModules, instead of inheriting from torch.jit.ScriptModule
. These changes combine to provide a simpler, easier-to-use API for converting your nn.Module
s into ScriptModules, ready to be optimized and executed in a non-Python environment.
The new usage looks like this:
import torch import torch.nn as nn import torch.nn.functional as F
class Model(nn.Module): def init(self): super().init() self.conv1 = nn.Conv2d(1, 20, 5) self.conv2 = nn.Conv2d(20, 20, 5)
def forward(self, x):
x = F.relu(self.conv1(x))
return F.relu(self.conv2(x))
my_model = Model() my_scripted_model = torch.jit.script(my_model)
- The module’s
forward
is compiled by default. Methods called fromforward
are lazily compiled in the order they are used inforward
. - To compile a method other than
forward
that is not called fromforward
, add@torch.jit.export
. - To stop the compiler from compiling a method, add @torch.jit.ignore or @torch.jit.unused.
@ignore
leaves the - method as a call to python, and
@unused
replaces it with an exception.@ignored
cannot be exported;@unused
can. - Most attribute types can be inferred, so
torch.jit.Attribute
is not necessary. For empty container types, annotate their types using PEP 526-style class annotations. - Constants can be marked with a
Final
class annotation instead of adding the name of the member to__constants__
. - Python 3 type hints can be used in place of
torch.jit.annotate
As a result of these changes, the following items are considered deprecated and should not appear in new code:
- The
@torch.jit.script_method
decorator - Classes that inherit from
torch.jit.ScriptModule
- The
torch.jit.Attribute
wrapper class - The
__constants__
array - The
torch.jit.annotate
function
Modules¶
Warning
The @torch.jit.ignore annotation’s behavior changes in PyTorch 1.2. Before PyTorch 1.2 the @ignore decorator was used to make a function or method callable from code that is exported. To get this functionality back, use @torch.jit.unused()
. @torch.jit.ignore
is now equivalent to @torch.jit.ignore(drop=False)
. See @torch.jit.ignoreand @torch.jit.unused for details.
When passed to the torch.jit.script function, a torch.nn.Module
's data is copied to a ScriptModule and the TorchScript compiler compiles the module. The module’s forward
is compiled by default. Methods called from forward
are lazily compiled in the order they are used in forward
, as well as any@torch.jit.export
methods.
torch.jit.export(fn)[source][source]¶
This decorator indicates that a method on an nn.Module
is used as an entry point into aScriptModule and should be compiled.
forward
implicitly is assumed to be an entry point, so it does not need this decorator. Functions and methods called from forward
are compiled as they are seen by the compiler, so they do not need this decorator either.
Example (using @torch.jit.export
on a method):
import torch import torch.nn as nn
class MyModule(nn.Module): def implicitly_compiled_method(self, x): return x + 99
# `forward` is implicitly decorated with `@torch.jit.export`,
# so adding it here would have no effect
def forward(self, x):
return x + 10
@torch.jit.export
def another_forward(self, x):
# When the compiler sees this call, it will compile
# `implicitly_compiled_method`
return self.implicitly_compiled_method(x)
def unused_method(self, x):
return x - 20
m
will contain compiled methods:
forward
another_forward
implicitly_compiled_method
unused_method
will not be compiled since it was not called from
any compiled methods and wasn't decorated with @torch.jit.export
m = torch.jit.script(MyModule())
Functions¶
Functions don’t change much, they can be decorated with @torch.jit.ignore or torch.jit.unused if needed.
Same behavior as pre-PyTorch 1.2
@torch.jit.script def some_fn(): return 2
Marks a function as ignored, if nothing
ever calls it then this has no effect
@torch.jit.ignore def some_fn2(): return 2
As with ignore, if nothing calls it then it has no effect.
If it is called in script it is replaced with an exception.
@torch.jit.unused def some_fn3(): import pdb; pdb.set_trace() return 4
Doesn't do anything, this function is already
the main entry point
@torch.jit.export def some_fn4(): return 2
TorchScript Classes¶
Warning
TorchScript class support is experimental. Currently it is best suited for simple record-like types (think a NamedTuple
with methods attached).
Everything in a user defined TorchScript Class is exported by default, functions can be decorated with @torch.jit.ignore if needed.
Attributes¶
The TorchScript compiler needs to know the types of module attributes. Most types can be inferred from the value of the member. Empty lists and dicts cannot have their types inferred and must have their types annotated with PEP 526-style class annotations. If a type cannot be inferred and is not explicitly annotated, it will not be added as an attribute to the resulting ScriptModule
Old API:
from typing import Dict import torch
class MyModule(torch.jit.ScriptModule): def init(self): super().init() self.my_dict = torch.jit.Attribute({}, Dict[str, int]) self.my_int = torch.jit.Attribute(20, int)
m = MyModule()
New API:
from typing import Dict
class MyModule(torch.nn.Module): my_dict: Dict[str, int]
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
# This type cannot be inferred and must be specified
self.my_dict = {}
# The attribute type here is inferred to be `int`
self.my_int = 20
def forward(self):
pass
m = torch.jit.script(MyModule())
Constants¶
The Final
type constructor can be used to mark members as constant. If members are not marked constant, they will be copied to the resulting ScriptModule as an attribute. Using Final
opens opportunities for optimization if the value is known to be fixed and gives additional type safety.
Old API:
class MyModule(torch.jit.ScriptModule): constants = ['my_constant']
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.my_constant = 2
def forward(self):
pass
m = MyModule()
New API:
from typing import Final
class MyModule(torch.nn.Module):
my_constant: Final[int]
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.my_constant = 2
def forward(self):
pass
m = torch.jit.script(MyModule())
Variables¶
Containers are assumed to have type Tensor
and be non-optional (seeDefault Types for more information). Previously, torch.jit.annotate
was used to tell the TorchScript compiler what the type should be. Python 3 style type hints are now supported.
import torch from typing import Dict, Optional
@torch.jit.script def make_dict(flag: bool): x: Dict[str, int] = {} x['hi'] = 2 b: Optional[int] = None if flag: b = 2 return x, b
Fusion Backends¶
There are a couple of fusion backends available to optimize TorchScript execution. The default fuser on CPUs is NNC, which can perform fusions for both CPUs and GPUs. The default fuser on GPUs is NVFuser, which supports a wider range of operators and has demonstrated generated kernels with improved throughput. See the NVFuser documentation for more details on usage and debugging.