[SUREFIRE-2065] Fix parameterized JUnit4 test reporting by andpab · Pull Request #608 · apache/maven-surefire (original) (raw)

This is an adjusted PR based on #516 from chalmagr.

I kept the additional ITs exactly as written by chalmagr.
The fix itself is different. It's less invasive, doesn't require making changes to the expectations of any expecting tests or ITs.

The root cause of the bug is that the logic for determining hasParams only looks at methodSource.getMethodParameterTypes(). That's not correct for JUnit 4 Parameterized tests since they do not have a method parameter. In JUnit 4 the parameterization is handled on a level further up.

The fix corrects the logic for determining hasParams so that it also works for JUnit4. It relies on the fact that for JUnit 4 parameterized tests there is a container-type test identifier with the legacyReportingName [<index>] or [<displayName>] that has an empty source field in the test identifier hierarchy - between the test method and the test class.


Following this checklist to help us incorporate your
contribution quickly and easily:

If your pull request is about ~20 lines of code you don't need to sign an
Individual Contributor License Agreement if you are unsure
please ask on the developers list.

To make clear that you license your contribution under
the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004
you have to acknowledge this by using the following check-box.