Takeshi Nozawa | Ritsumeikan University (original) (raw)
Papers by Takeshi Nozawa
International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 2015
The accuracy with which native Japanese listeners identified American English vowels and coda nas... more The accuracy with which native Japanese listeners identified American English vowels and coda nasals was assessed before and after training. The listeners were divided into four groups, each of which received a different type of training. Two of the four groups were vowel-oriented; one of these groups received vowel identification training (VI), while the other received vowel discrimination training (VD). The other two groups were nasal-oriented. One of the nasal-oriented groups received nasal identification training (NI), and the other received nasal discrimination training (ND). The results revealed that the VI group made more gains in its ability to identify vowels than the other groups after training. However, training appeared to have no effect on nasal identification, and no significant difference among the groups was observed.
Native speakers of Japanese and Korean identified 6 American English monophthongs /i, ɪ, ɛ, ae, ɑ... more Native speakers of Japanese and Korean identified 6 American English monophthongs /i, ɪ, ɛ, ae, ɑ, ʌ/ and discriminated 6 vowel pairs /i/-/ɪ/, /ɛ/-/ɪ/, /ae/-/ɛ/, /ae/-/ɑ/, /ae/-/ʌ/, /ɑ/-/ʌ/ in in /hVt/, /pVt/, /pVn/ and /pVl/ frames. The two groups of listeners' identification and discrimination accuracy were submitted to 2 mixed-design ANOVAs, respectively, with 2 Listener Groups as a between-subject variable, and 6 frames and 6 vowels (or vowel pairs) as within-subject variables. As for identification, a main effect of vowel and frame are both significant (p<.001), and a three-way interaction of listener groups × vowels × frames is also significant (p<.001). Post-hoc pair-wise comparisons revealed that Korean listeners identified /ʌ/ significantly better than Japanese listeners. This is probably because Korean listeners can equate the English vowel to Korean /ʌ/. Japanese listeners' identification accuracy of /i/ is lower before /n/ and /l/, but that of Korean listen...
Language Learning & Language Teaching, 2007
Journal of Phonetics, 1997
Native speakers of Japanese and Korean assessed perceived similarity between American English vow... more Native speakers of Japanese and Korean assessed perceived similarity between American English vowels and vowels of their L1, and native speakers of American English performed the same task. The results revealed no significant main effects of listener groups, but a significant interaction of vowels by listener groups was confirmed. The results indicate that listeners’ L1 phonology as well as phonetic distance in the vowel space affects perceived similarity between L1 and nonnative phones. The results also imply that what speakers of Japanese and Korean believe are close to their L1 phones are not necessarily perceived as similar by English speakers.
The accuracy with which native Japanese listeners identified American English vowels and coda nas... more The accuracy with which native Japanese listeners identified American English vowels and coda nasals was assessed before and after training. The listeners were divided into four groups, each of which received a different type of training. Two of the four groups were vowel-oriented; one of these groups received vowel identification training (VI), while the other received vowel discrimination training (VD). The other two groups were nasal-oriented. One of the nasal-oriented groups received nasal identification training (NI), and the other received nasal discrimination training (ND). The results revealed that the VI group made more gains in its ability to identify vowels than the other groups after training. However, training appeared to have no effect on nasal identification, and no significant difference among the groups was observed.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
ことばの科学研究 Journal of the Japan Society For Speech Sciences, 2012
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2014
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2009
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2010
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2003
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2008
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2007
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2001
International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 2015
The accuracy with which native Japanese listeners identified American English vowels and coda nas... more The accuracy with which native Japanese listeners identified American English vowels and coda nasals was assessed before and after training. The listeners were divided into four groups, each of which received a different type of training. Two of the four groups were vowel-oriented; one of these groups received vowel identification training (VI), while the other received vowel discrimination training (VD). The other two groups were nasal-oriented. One of the nasal-oriented groups received nasal identification training (NI), and the other received nasal discrimination training (ND). The results revealed that the VI group made more gains in its ability to identify vowels than the other groups after training. However, training appeared to have no effect on nasal identification, and no significant difference among the groups was observed.
Native speakers of Japanese and Korean identified 6 American English monophthongs /i, ɪ, ɛ, ae, ɑ... more Native speakers of Japanese and Korean identified 6 American English monophthongs /i, ɪ, ɛ, ae, ɑ, ʌ/ and discriminated 6 vowel pairs /i/-/ɪ/, /ɛ/-/ɪ/, /ae/-/ɛ/, /ae/-/ɑ/, /ae/-/ʌ/, /ɑ/-/ʌ/ in in /hVt/, /pVt/, /pVn/ and /pVl/ frames. The two groups of listeners' identification and discrimination accuracy were submitted to 2 mixed-design ANOVAs, respectively, with 2 Listener Groups as a between-subject variable, and 6 frames and 6 vowels (or vowel pairs) as within-subject variables. As for identification, a main effect of vowel and frame are both significant (p<.001), and a three-way interaction of listener groups × vowels × frames is also significant (p<.001). Post-hoc pair-wise comparisons revealed that Korean listeners identified /ʌ/ significantly better than Japanese listeners. This is probably because Korean listeners can equate the English vowel to Korean /ʌ/. Japanese listeners' identification accuracy of /i/ is lower before /n/ and /l/, but that of Korean listen...
Language Learning & Language Teaching, 2007
Journal of Phonetics, 1997
Native speakers of Japanese and Korean assessed perceived similarity between American English vow... more Native speakers of Japanese and Korean assessed perceived similarity between American English vowels and vowels of their L1, and native speakers of American English performed the same task. The results revealed no significant main effects of listener groups, but a significant interaction of vowels by listener groups was confirmed. The results indicate that listeners’ L1 phonology as well as phonetic distance in the vowel space affects perceived similarity between L1 and nonnative phones. The results also imply that what speakers of Japanese and Korean believe are close to their L1 phones are not necessarily perceived as similar by English speakers.
The accuracy with which native Japanese listeners identified American English vowels and coda nas... more The accuracy with which native Japanese listeners identified American English vowels and coda nasals was assessed before and after training. The listeners were divided into four groups, each of which received a different type of training. Two of the four groups were vowel-oriented; one of these groups received vowel identification training (VI), while the other received vowel discrimination training (VD). The other two groups were nasal-oriented. One of the nasal-oriented groups received nasal identification training (NI), and the other received nasal discrimination training (ND). The results revealed that the VI group made more gains in its ability to identify vowels than the other groups after training. However, training appeared to have no effect on nasal identification, and no significant difference among the groups was observed.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
ことばの科学研究 Journal of the Japan Society For Speech Sciences, 2012
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2014
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2009
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2010
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2003
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2008
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2007
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2001