Adam J Howell | Southern Baptist Theological seminary (original) (raw)
Address: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
less
Uploads
Papers by Adam J Howell
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 2010
The enigmatic nature of Exod. 4.24-26 leaves many readers wondering both where the passage origin... more The enigmatic nature of Exod. 4.24-26 leaves many readers wondering both where the passage originated and also how the passage should be understood. Many of the difficulties of this passage revolve around the identification of the pronominal suffixes in the simple Hebrew grammar. This article argues that the reasonable antecedent of the vague pronominal suffixes is Gershom, Moses’ firstborn son. Gershom, being uncircumcised as he and his family return to Egypt, is considered a foreigner and will suffer the same fate as Egypt’s firstborn in the tenth plague. Therefore, Zipporah circumcises her son and exclaims that he is a ם י מ ד ן ת ח, a relative to Yahweh by means of the blood of circumcision. Gershom is now identified as one of the Hebrew people because of the visible blood sign of his circumcision and enjoys Yahweh’s protection. In order to draw this conclusion, one must separate the translation of the word ן ת ח from the contextual meaning of the phrase ם י מ ד ן ת ח. Only then does this bizarre passage make the most sense.
![Research paper thumbnail of The Firstborn Son of Moses as the 'Relative of Blood' in Exodus 4.24-26 (JSOT 35.1 [2010], 63-76)](https://attachments.academia-assets.com/39024378/thumbnails/1.jpg)
](The enigmatic nature of Exod. 4.24-26 leaves many readers wondering both where the passage origin... more The enigmatic nature of Exod. 4.24-26 leaves many readers wondering both where the passage originated and also how the passage should be understood. Many of the difficulties of this passage revolve around the identification of the pronominal suffixes in the simple Hebrew grammar. This article argues that the reasonable antecedent of the vague pronominal suffixes is Gershom, Moses’ firstborn son. Gershom, being uncircumcised as he and his family return to Egypt, is considered a foreigner and will suffer the same fate as Egypt’s firstborn in the tenth plague. Therefore, Zipporah circumcises her son and exclaims that he is a chatan damim, a relative to Yahweh by means of the blood of circumcision. Gershom is now identified as one of the Hebrew people because of the visible blood sign of his circumcision and enjoys Yahweh’s protection. In order to draw this conclusion, one must separate the translation of the word Bis from the contextual mean- ing of the phrase chatan damim. Only then does this bizarre passage make the most sense.
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 2010
The enigmatic nature of Exod. 4.24-26 leaves many readers wondering both where the passage origin... more The enigmatic nature of Exod. 4.24-26 leaves many readers wondering both where the passage originated and also how the passage should be understood. Many of the difficulties of this passage revolve around the identification of the pronominal suffixes in the simple Hebrew grammar. This article argues that the reasonable antecedent of the vague pronominal suffixes is Gershom, Moses’ firstborn son. Gershom, being uncircumcised as he and his family return to Egypt, is considered a foreigner and will suffer the same fate as Egypt’s firstborn in the tenth plague. Therefore, Zipporah circumcises her son and exclaims that he is a ם י מ ד ן ת ח, a relative to Yahweh by means of the blood of circumcision. Gershom is now identified as one of the Hebrew people because of the visible blood sign of his circumcision and enjoys Yahweh’s protection. In order to draw this conclusion, one must separate the translation of the word ן ת ח from the contextual meaning of the phrase ם י מ ד ן ת ח. Only then does this bizarre passage make the most sense.
The enigmatic nature of Exod. 4.24-26 leaves many readers wondering both where the passage origin... more The enigmatic nature of Exod. 4.24-26 leaves many readers wondering both where the passage originated and also how the passage should be understood. Many of the difficulties of this passage revolve around the identification of the pronominal suffixes in the simple Hebrew grammar. This article argues that the reasonable antecedent of the vague pronominal suffixes is Gershom, Moses’ firstborn son. Gershom, being uncircumcised as he and his family return to Egypt, is considered a foreigner and will suffer the same fate as Egypt’s firstborn in the tenth plague. Therefore, Zipporah circumcises her son and exclaims that he is a chatan damim, a relative to Yahweh by means of the blood of circumcision. Gershom is now identified as one of the Hebrew people because of the visible blood sign of his circumcision and enjoys Yahweh’s protection. In order to draw this conclusion, one must separate the translation of the word Bis from the contextual mean- ing of the phrase chatan damim. Only then does this bizarre passage make the most sense.