Reducing gender bias in STEM - MIT Science Policy Review (original) (raw)

[1] Civil Rights Act of 1964. https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/title-vii-civil-rights-act-1964\. Accessed June 2020.

[2] Falkenheim, J. C. Higher education in science and engineering. Report, National Science Board (2018). URL https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/indicators/. Accessed June 2020.

[3] Table 318.45: Number and percentage distribution of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) degrees/certificates conferred by postsecondary institutions, by race/ethnicity, level of degree/certificate, and sex of student: 2008-09 through 2014-15. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). (2016). URL https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d16/tables/dt16\_318.45.asp. Accessed June 2020.

[4] Quick take: Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Catalyst (2019). URL https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem/. Accessed June 2020.

[5] Shen, H. Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap. Nature 495, 22–4 (2013). https:// doi.org/10.1038/495022a.

[6] Dasgupta, S. Inadequate representation of women in STEM research: The “leaky pipeline”. Editage Insights (2017). URL https://www.editage.com/insights/inadequate-representation-of-women-in-stem-research-the-leaky-pipeline. Accessed June 2020, https://doi.org/10.34193/EI-A-5452\.

[7] Rice, C. Why women leave academia. Inside Higher Education (2012). URL https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/university-venus/why-women-leave-academia. Accessed June 2020.

[8] Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J. & Handelsman, J. Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109\.

[9] Noonan, R. Women in STEM: 2017 update. U.S. Department of Commerce (2017). URL https://www.commerce.gov/news/fact-sheets/2017/11/women-stem-2017-update. Accessed June 2020.

[10] Landivar, L. C. Disparities in STEM employment by sex, race, and hispanic origin. U.S. Department of Commerce (2013). URL https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/2013/acs/acs-24.pdf. Accessed June 2020.

[11] González, M. J., Cortina, C. & Rodríguez, J. The role of gender stereotypes in hiring: A field experiment. European Sociological Review 35, 187–204 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy055\.

[12] Werber, C. McKinsey and Lean In say they’ve found the biggest barrier to gender parity at companies. Quartz at Work (2019). URL https://qz.com/work/1728182/mckinsey-and-leanin-women-are-less-likely-to-be-promoted-or-hired-to-first-time-manager/. Accessed June 2020.

[13] Criado Perez, C. Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men (Abrams Press, New York, 2019).

[14] Shaver, K. Female dummy makes her mark on male-dominated crash tests. Washington Post (2012). URL https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/female-dummy-makes-her-mark-on-male-dominated-crash-tests/2012/03/07/gIQANBLjaS\_story.html. Accessed June 2020.

[15] Trades Union Congress. Personal protective equipment and women (2017). URL https://www.tuc.org.uk/sites/default/files/PPEandwomenguidance.pdf. Accessed June 2020.

[16] Kingma, B. & van Marken Lichtenbelt, W. Energy consumption in buildings and female thermal demand. Nature Climate Change 5, 1054–1056 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2741\.

[17] Watson, T. Workplace AC comfy for men – but not women. USA Today (2015). URL https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/08/04/air-conditioning-women-workers/31120009/. Accessed June 2020.

[18] Chang, T. Y. & Kajackaite, A. Battle for the thermostat: Gender and the effect of temperature on cognitive performance. PLoS ONE 14, e0216362 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216362\.

[19] Madigan, J. C. The education of women and girls in the United States: A historical perspective. Advances in Gender and Education 1, 11–13 (2009). URL https://www.ncgs.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/11/The-Education-of-Girls-and-Women-in-the-United-States-A-Historical-Perspective.pdf.

[20] Jaxon, J., Lei, R. F., Shachnai, R., Chestnut, E. K. & Cimpian, A. The acquisition of gender stereotypes about intellectual ability: Intersections with Race. Journal of Social Issues 75, 1192–1215 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12352\.

[21] STEM Depiction Opportunities. Obama White House (2016). URL https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/imageofstemdepictiondoc\_02102016\_clean.pdf. Accessed June 2020.

[22] Good, J. J., Woodzicka, J. A. & Wingfield, L. C. The effects of gender stereotypic and counter-stereotypic textbook images on science performance. The Journal of Social Psychology 150, 132–147 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903366552\.

[23] Cheryan, S., Siy, J. O., Vichayapai, M., Drury, B. J. & Kim, S. Do female and male role models Who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM? Social Psychological and Personality Science 2, 656–664 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611405218\.

[24] National Science Foundation. New formulas for America’s workforce: Girls in science and engineering (2003). Publication No. 03-207. Report, National Science Foundation (2003). URL https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2003/nsf03207/start.htm. Accessed June 2020.

[25] Ware, R. closing the tech gender divide. First Data: Connected 2 (2017). URL https://www.firstdata.com/newsroom/assets/fd-connected/pdfs/FD\_CONNECTED\_VOL2\_\_Girls\_Who\_Code.pdf. Accessed June 2020.

[26] Girls Who Code Annual Report 2019. Report, Girls Who Code (2019). URL https://girlswhocode.com/2019report/#numbers. Accessed June 2020.

[27] FIRST. Reaching diverse youth in underserved communities. Report (2019). URL https://www.firstinspires.org/sites/default/files/uploads/resource\_library/impact/edi-impact-flyer.pdf. Accessed June 2020.

[28] National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indicators 2016. NSB-2016-1. Report, National Science Foundation (2016). URL https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsb20161/#/report/chapter-2/highlights. Accessed June 2020.

[29] Burack, C., Melchior, A. & Hoover, M. Do after-school robotics programs expand the pipeline into STEM majors in college? Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) 9, 7 (2019). https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1244\.

[30] García, Y. V., Catchen, R., Cruz, A., Kincaid, P., & Peters, B. This is what STEM looks like! Report, The Women’s Foundation of Colorado (2017). URL https://www.wfco.org/impact/this-is-what-stem-looks-like. Accessed June 2020.

[31] Pretty Brainy Fact Sheet 2017-2018. Report, Pretty Brainy (2018). URL https://prettybrainy.com/steam-education-outcomes/. Accessed June 2020.

[32] Allen, P. J. et al. Afterschool & STEM system building evaluation 2016. The PEAR Institute: Partnerships in Education and Resilience, Belmont, MA2017 (2017). URL https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/e45463\_e14ee6fac98d405e950c66fe28de9bf8.pdf. Accessed June 2020.

[33] Gilbert, D. et al. Community STEM collaborations that support children and families. Afterschool Alliance (2020). URL https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED602091.pdf. Accessed June 2020.

[34] Sex and gender discrimination in the workplace. National Conference of State Legislatures (2019). URL https://www.ncsl.org/research/labor-and-employment/-gender-and-sex-discrimination.aspx. Accessed June 2020.

[35] Babcock, L., Recalde, M. P. & Vesterlund, L. Why women volunteer for tasks that don’t lead to promotions. Harvard Business Review (2018). URL https://hbr.org/2018/07/why-women-volunteer-for-tasks-that-dont-lead-to-promotions. Accessed June 2020.

[36] Hoerner, B. O. The role-modeling BFOQ: Court confusion and education promise. Journal of Business Law 16, 1211 (2014). URL https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1458&context=jbl. Accessed June 2020.

[37] Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977).

[38] Hooters settles suit by men denied jobs. New York Times (1997). URL https://www.nytimes.com/1997/10/01/us/hooters-settles-suit-by-men-denied-jobs.html. Accessed June 2020.

[39] Aamodt, M. Really, I come here for the food: Sex as a BFOQ for restaurant servers. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist 53 (2017). URL https://www.siop.org/Research-Publications/TIP/TIP-Back-Issue/2017/January/ArtMID/20301/ArticleID/1624/Really-I-Come-Here-for-The-Food-Sex-as-a-BFOQ-for-Restaurant-Server. Accessed June 2020.

[40] Leveille, V. & Garvey, M. Pregnant workers are still fighting for the right to work. American Civil Liberties Union (2020). URL https://www.aclu.org/news/womens-rights/pregnant-workers-are-still-fighting-for-the-right-to-work/. Accessed June 2020.

[41] By the numbers: Women continue to face pregnancy discrimination in the workplace. Data Brief, The National Partnership for Women and Families (2016). URL https://www.nationalpartnership.org/ourwork/resources/economic-justice/pregnancy-discrimination/by-the-numbers-women-continue-to-face-pregnancy-discrimination-in-the-workplace.pdf. Accessed June 2020.

[42] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 (1978). URL https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/pregnancy-discrimination-act-1978\. Accessed June 2020.

[43] National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Academic Science and Engineering: Report of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press (2006). Accessed June 2020, https://doi.org/10.17226/11766.

[44] Williams, J. C. & Massinger, K. How women are harassed out of science. The Atlantic (2016). URL https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/07/how-women-are-harassed-out-of-science/492521/. Accessed June 2020.

[45] Lieberwitz, R. et al. The history, uses, and abuses of Title IX. Bulletin, American Association of University Professors (2016). URL https://www.aaup.org/report/history-uses-and-abuses-title-ix. Accessed June 2020.

[46] Busso, M. Women close gender pay gap in two STEM jobs, lag in others. Bloomberg (2017). URL https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2017-women-stem-jobs/. Accessed June 2020.

[47] Michelmore, K. & Sassler, S. Explaining the gender wage gap in STEM: Does field sex composition matter? RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 2, 194–215 (2016). http://www.doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2016.2.4.07\.

[48] Alderman, L. Britain aims to close gender pay gap with transparency and shame. New York Times (2018). URL https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/business/britain-gender-pay-gap.html. Accessed June 2020.

[49] Dromey, L. & Joe; Rankin. The fair pay report: How pay transparency can help tackle inequalities. Report, Institute for Public Policy Research (2018). URL https://www.ippr.org/research/publications/the-fair-pay-report. Accessed June 2020.

[50] Oltermann, P. Germany to require firms to publish data on gender pay parity. The Guardian (2016). URL https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/07/germany-to-require-firms-to-publish-data-on-gender-pay-parity. Accessed June 2020.

[51] Domonoske, C. Companies in Iceland now required to demonstrate they pay men, women fairly. National Public Radio (2018). URL https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwoway/2018/01/03/575403863/companies-in-iceland-now-required-to-demonstrate-they-pay-men-women-fairly. Accessed June 2020.

[52] Henley, J. ‘Equality won’t happen by itself’: how Iceland got tough on gender pay gap. The Guardian (2018). URL https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/feb/20/iceland-equal-pay-law-gender-gap-women-jobs-equality. Accessed June 2020.

[53] Wiessner, D. EEOC will cease collection of pay data under Obama-era rule. Reuters (2019). URL https://www.reuters.com/article/employment-eeoc/eeoc-will-cease-collection-of-pay-data-under-obama-era-rule-idUSL2N2630VT. Accessed June 2020.

[54] Notice of information collection—request for new control number for a currently approved collection: Employer information report (EEO-1) component 1; revision of existing approval for EEO-1 component 2. (84 FR 48138). Federal Register 84, 48138–48142 (2019). URL https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/09/12/2019-19767/agency-information-collection-activities-existing-collection. Accessed June 2020.

[55] ACLU statement on federal agency decision to stop collecting wage data. American Civil Liberties Union (2019). URL https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/aclu-statement-federal-agency-decision-stop-collecting-wage-data. Accessed June 2020.

[56] Tarr, T. How Icelandic women really feel about the new equal pay law. Forbes (2018). URL https://www.forbes.com/sites/tanyatarr/2018/01/08/how-icelandic-women-really-feel-about-the-new-equal-paylaw/#50c027744f13\. Accessed June 2020.

[57] Bernstein, R. After a baby, 28% of new parents leave full-time STEM work. Science (2019). URL https://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2019/02/after-baby-28-new-parents-leave-full-time-stem-work. Accessed June 2020, http://www.doi.org/10.1126/science.caredit.aax0346\.

[58] OECD family database: Child-related leave. Report, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2019). URL http://www.oecd.org/els/family/database.htm. Accessed June 2020.

[59] Hideg, I., Krstic, A., Trau, R. & Zarina, T. Do longer maternity leaves hurt women’s careers? Harvard Business Review (2018). URL https://hbr.org/2018/09/do-longer-maternity-leaves-hurt-womens-careers. Accessed June 2020.

[60] Gupta, V., Hieronimus, S., Krishnan, M. & Madgavkar, A. Accelerating gender parity: What can governments do? McKinsey & Company (2019). URL https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-sector/our-insights/accelerating-gender-parity-what-can-governments-do#. Accessed June 2020.

[61] Ogden, L. E. Working mothers face a ‘wall’ of bias—but there are ways to push back. Science (2019). Accessed June 2020, http://doi:10.1126/science.caredit.aax6510\.

[62] Correll, S. J., Benard, S. & Paik, I. Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology 112, 1297–1339 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1086/511799\.

[63] Padavic, I., Ely, R. J. & Reid, E. M. Explaining the persistence of gender inequality: The work–family narrative as a social defense against the 24/7 work culture. Administrative Science Quarterly 65, 61–111 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219832310\.

[64] Johnson, S., Hekman, D. & Chan, E. If there’s only one woman in your candidate pool, there’s statistically no chance she’ll be hired. Harvard Business Review (2016). URL https://hbr.org/amp/2016/04/if-theres-only-one-woman-in-your-candidate-pool-theres-statistically-no-chance-shell-be-hired. Accessed June 2020.

[65] Miller, C. C. Is blind hiring the best hiring? The New York Times Magazine (2016). URL https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/magazine/is-blind-hiring-the-best-hiring.html. Accessed June 2020.

[66] Bortz, D. Can blind hiring improve workplace diversity? Society for Human Resource Management (2018). URL https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hrmagazine/0418/pages/can-blind-hiring-improve-workplace-diversity.aspx. Accessed June 2020.

[67] Huang, J., Krivkovich, A., Starikova, I., Yee, L. & Zanoschi, D. Women in the workplace 2019. McKinsey & Company (2019). URL https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/gender-equality/women-in-the-workplace-2019\. Accessed June 2020.

[68] Law, T. Women are now the majority of the U.S. workforce—but working women still face serious challenges. Time (2020). URL https://time.com/576678/women-workforce/. Accessed June 2020.

[69] Zillman, C. The Fortune 500 has more female CEOs than ever before. Fortune (2019). URL https://fortune.com/2019/05/16/fortune-500-female-ceos/. Accessed June 2020.

[70] Fuhrmans, V. Where are all the women CEOs? Wall Street Journal (2020). URL https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-so-few-ceos-are-women-you-can-have-a-seat-at-the-table-and-not-be-a-player-11581003276\. Accessed June 2020.

[71] Sanofi. Development opportunity: Empowering your career (2020). URL https://www.sanofi.com/en/careers/grow-with-us/development-opportunity-how-sanofi-empowers-you. Accessed June 2020.

[72] Ferrante, M. B. Before breaking the glass ceiling, women must climb the maternal wall. Forbes (2018). URL https://www.forbes.com/sites/marybethferrante/2018/10/31/before-breaking-the-glass-ceiling-women-must-climb-the-maternal-wall/#40fa4b89c519\. Accessed June 2020.

[73] Pruchno, R., Litchfield, L. & Fried, M. Measuring the impact of workplace flexibility. Tech. Rep., Chestnut Hill, Mass.: Boston College Center for Work & Family, Carroll School of Management (2000).

[74] Gender-Equality Index. Bloomberg (2020). URL https://www.bloomberg.com/gei. Accessed June 2020.

[75] Gender Reporting Framework. Bloomberg (2019). URL https://www.bloomberg.com/gei/framework/. Accessed June 2020.

[76] Anker, M. Addressing sex and gender in epidemic-prone infectious diseases. World Health Organization (2007). URL https://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/SexGenderInfectDis.pdf. Accessed June 2020.

[77] COVID-19 sex disaggregated data tracker. Global Health 50/50 (2020). URL https://globalhealth5050.org/covid19/sex-disaggregated-data-tracker/. Accessed June 2020.

[78] Wenham, C., Smith, J., & Morgan, R. COVID-19: the gendered impacts of the outbreak. The Lancet 395, 846–848 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30526-2.

[79] Ovseiko, P. V., Chapple, A., Edmunds, L. D. & Ziebland, S. Advancing gender equality through the Athena SWAN Charter for Women in Science: an exploratory study of women’s and men’s perceptions. Health Research Policy and Systems 15, 12 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0177-9.

[80] Munir, F. et al. Evaluating the effectiveness and impact of the Athena SWAN Charter. Advance HE (2014). URL https://www.ecu.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/external/evaluating-the-effectiveness-and-impact-of-the-athena-swan-charter.pdf. Accessed June 2020.

[81] Smith, K. A., Arlotta, P. & Watt, F. M. Seven actionable strategies for advancing women in science, engineering, and medicine. Cell Stem Cell 16, 221-224 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2015.02.012.

[82] Beeler, W. H. et al. Institutional report cards for gender equality: Lessons learned from benchmarking efforts for women in STEM. Cell Stem Cell 25, 306–310 (2019). www.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2019.08.010.