Total Nut, Tree Nut, Peanut, and Peanut Butter Consumption and the Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in the Netherlands Cohort Study (original) (raw)

“…Despite observing lower relative risks for higher consumers compared to nonconsumers (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.63-1.11; p-trend = 0.17), none of the associations or trend tests were statistically significant. 16 Our results are consistent with those from the case-control study, the Netherlands Cohort Study and the Golestan Cohort Study studies, but not with the Nurses' Health Study. Nonetheless, we advise caution when comparing results across studies since nut consumption was assessed differently, and the types of nuts consumed differed between studies.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

See 4 more Smart Citations

“…Despite observing lower relative risks for higher consumers compared to nonconsumers (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.63-1.11; p-trend = 0.17), none of the associations or trend tests were statistically significant. 16 Our results are consistent with those from the case-control study, the Netherlands Cohort Study and the Golestan Cohort Study studies, but not with the Nurses' Health Study. Nonetheless, we advise caution when comparing results across studies since nut consumption was assessed differently, and the types of nuts consumed differed between studies.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

“…The most recent study was conducted in the Netherlands Cohort Study and evaluated the association between consumption of nuts (sum of peanuts and tree nut), tree nuts, and peanut butter and the risk of PC overall and by sex. Despite observing lower relative risks for higher consumers compared to nonconsumers (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.63–1.11; p ‐trend = 0.17), none of the associations or trend tests were statistically significant …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

See 3 more Smart Citations