9/11 - US Complicity: Implausible, or Very Probable? (original) (raw)

http://tvnewslies.org/html/9_11_-_us_complicity__implausi.html

9/11 – US Complicity: Implausible, or Very Probable?
Questions for the People Who Believe the Official Conspiracy Theory
TvNewsLIES.org - June 30, 2005

It is time for the people who support the official conspiracy theory to stop calling names and to start answering some questions.

The simple question of “who benefited” from the events of 9/11 can in many cases be answered by saying “the people who were supposed to prevent 9/11”. Doesn’t that make you just a little bit curious? It should.

So you think it ludicrous to suggest that a rogue group within our government was involved in the events of September 11th, 2001? You don’t even think it is worth your time to examine the overwhelming physical evidence that is available for your viewing, which at the very least disproves the official “conspiracy theory” put forth by the government and their mouthpieces in the corporate media?

Let me ask you folks some questions. Help me out here. If I am to ignore all the physical evidence that indicates government complicity I need you to explain to me why I should ignore the unprecedented actions by the Bush administration preceding the events, that seem to have no other purpose other than to prevent an event like 9/11 from being stopped and to prepare to set in motion their pre-planned agenda that would only be accepted after an event like 9/11.

QUESTIONS:

1. We Could Never Imagine Planes Used to Attack Us - We have been told that the US was not only unprepared for defending our nation against planes used as weapons but we were told by our National Security Advisor, Condoleezza Rice that we never imagined such a thing.
QUESTION: Why do you believe that the US was not prepared to prevent such an event when we had held drills for just such an event in the past?
REFERENCE: USA Today - NORAD had drills of jets as weapons
QUESTION: Why do you believe that we had no idea anyone would fly a plane into the WTC when and FBI agent warned of the very thing only to have his warnings dismissed?
REFERENCE: F.B.I. Agent Cited Trade Center Attack Ahead of Sept. 11
2. There is a great deal of information indicating the fact that one of the first directives of the Bush administration upon taking office was to have the intelligence community back off of all investigations into Osama Bin Laden and his family.
QUESTION: Why was the Bush administration protecting Bin Laden? Why do you ignore the close ties between the Bush family and the Bin Laden family?
REFERENCE: The Bush/Bin Laden Connection.
3. Are you aware that Dov S. Zakheim, a former vice president of System Planning Corp., a defense contractor which makes remote control and flight termination products, was sworn in as the Under Secretary of Defense?
Question: Did you know that remote controlled flight was possible and that someone who was very involved with this technology was a member of the Bush administration?
REFERENCE: Command Transmitter System - The Mastermind Behind 911?
4. During June 2001 the US was planning military action against Afghanistan.
QUESTION: Why was the US planning on military action against Afghanistan before the events of 9/11 took place? Why would Congress permit this? 9/11 was the official reason for the military action against Afghanistan.
REFERENCE: India and Iran will "facilitate" US and Russian plans for "limited military action" against the Taliban - US 'planned attack on Taleban' BBC
QUESTION: Doesn’t common sense suggest to you that it might just be possible that the administration was in search of a legal and publicly acceptable excuse to attack Afghanistan and install a US friendly government with a former UNOCAL Oil company consultant, with ties to the Bush family business, as it’s new leader?
REFERENCE: Agreement On US 3.2 Billion Gas Pipeline Project Signed
5. Attorney General John Ashcroft stops flying commercial aircrafts three months before 9/11 due to threats.
QUESTION: Why did he stop flying commercial aircrafts? What did he know?
REFERENCE: Ashcroft has been advised to travel only by private jet for the remainder of his term.
6. All of a sudden. prior to 9/11/2001, the procedures for military response to hijacked aircrafts were changed where military response had to be approved by Donald Rumseld. Donald Rumsfled is a member of the PNAC organization that publicly professed that a “New Pearl Harbor” would benefit their agenda.
QUESTION: Why were procedures specifically involving hijackings changed? Were the old procedures problematic? Why was a person who could benefit from an event like a hijacking given the responsibility of handling them?
REFERENCE: Military Assistance to Civil Authorities

For All the FOURTEEN Questions and much more:
http://tvnewslies.org/html/9_11_-_us_complicity__implausi.html