manifestors of creative belief (original) (raw)
manifestors of creative belief [Most Recent Entries][Calendar View] [Friends]
Below are the 20 most recent journal entries recorded inThe Nature of Personal Reality's LiveJournal:
[ << Previous 20 ]
| Saturday, May 31st, 2008 | |
|---|---|
| _4:38 pm_[astrelsa] |
Seems there isn't much activity in this community nowadays, but I thought there might be some folks who would like to know that Rob Butts passed into spirit a few days ago. His obituary can be found here. Regards to all fellow Seth readers. (3 Comments |Comment on this) |
| Wednesday, April 16th, 2008 | |
| _3:08 am_[elyusium] |
atoms, energy, quasars We hardly ever write for some reason but I found this a moment ago and thought it of interest. I have not figured out how to use it in a practical sense yet. I read Seth often when I can't sleep and figure if it gets me there maybe I'll remember something he teaches about dreaming."Atoms do not create energy in a basic manner. They make energy usable within your system. Energy appears in your universe through the nucleus of the atom, but the nucleus is not the originator of the energy. It simply seems to be."early session bk 6 pg 94 discussion of quasars and our inability to perceive whole actions.this statement is of course a refutation of scientific knowledge as far as I know, though science still knows little of quasars.peacee (2 Comments |Comment on this) |
| Saturday, June 23rd, 2007 | |
| _1:51 am_[saymorre] |
Aloha! Just wondering if there are any other Seth sites I can check out?Namaste. Current Mood:  curious (2 Comments |Comment on this) |
| Friday, September 1st, 2006 | |
| _7:16 pm_[vveritasv] |
Kids Create I am new to this community, though not new to Seth. ( Read more...Collapse ) (10 Comments |Comment on this) |
| Monday, June 19th, 2006 | |
| _11:07 am_[jimschutte] |
The Movie Prolly old news to many, but I just heard:http://imdb.com/title/tt0491158/ & http://www.alliancefilmworks.com/I'm told Oscar-winning actors are vying for the role of Jane Roberts. (4 Comments |Comment on this) |
| Sunday, May 14th, 2006 | |
| _10:47 pm_[intransition] |
Glad to be here Hello,I just stumbled upon this community. It is most thrilling...I can't really describe in words how deeply the Seth material has affected me and helped remind me how to more consciously manipulate my reality.But, such is life, and it is all so truly magical. (3 Comments |Comment on this) |
| Wednesday, May 3rd, 2006 | |
| _1:28 pm_[umpachki] |
Any personal experiences with the inner senses that are notable? (Comment on this) |
| Wednesday, March 1st, 2006 | |
| _12:57 pm_[photonduality] |
Oversoul Seven and the Museum of Time So I *finally* found a copy of the elusive Oversoul Seven & The Museum of Time (the third and final chapter of the Oversoul Seven trilogy for anyone who may not know)...It was the lovely three-in-one compilation volume and so, to christ-ien (pun intended) it and prepare myself I re-read the first two volumes of the series and then followed it with Museum of Time.Has anyone read any of the Oversoul seven books? All three? What did you think?( spoilers, perhaps, ahead...Collapse ) (7 Comments |Comment on this) |
| Monday, January 30th, 2006 | |
| _3:53 pm_[umpachki] |
I'm curious...Where is everyone from?I am in Pittsburgh. (20 Comments |Comment on this) |
| Friday, December 30th, 2005 | |
| _10:14 pm_[elyusium] |
I may be double posting here but this is what I commented to lidia about.This is a paraphrase, it is on a jacket that I have long since discarded after reading the book a dozen times, anyone know which one?: Only someone who trusts their impulses completely can choose from a myriad of action the most beneficial ones for actualization.SethAnd from Jane, an always good reminder for me.A Psychic ManifestoMy life is its own definitions,So is yours.Let us leave the priests To their hells and heavens,and confinethe scientiststo their dying universes,with its accidentally created stars.Let us each dareto open our dream’s door,and explorethe unofficial thresholds,where we begin.And from my own source:In your terms, the most powerful thing you have contact with is thought. The most powerful organization you have contact with is the human psyche. Private personal experience is an awesome thing. Creativity reigns and you are it.Adampeacee (2 Comments |Comment on this) |
| _7:41 am_[beloved4always] |
New Year's resolutions a la Seth taken from Dreams, "Evolution," and Value Fulfillment, session 891, Rob's notesOne: I will approve of myself, my characteristics, my abilities, my likes and dislikes, my inclinations and disinclinations, realizing that these form my unique individuality. They are given me for a reason.Two: I will approve of and rejoice in my accomplishments, and I will be as vigorous in listing these - as rigorous in remembering them - as I have ever been in remembering and enumerating my failures or lacks of accomplishment.Three: I will remember the creative framework of existence, in which I have my being. Therefore the possibilities, potentials, seeming miracles, and joyful spontaneity of Framework 2 will be in my mind, so that the doors to creative living are open.Four: I will realize that the future is a probability. In terms of ordinary experience, nothing exists there yet. It is virgin territory, planted by my feelings and thoughts in the present. Therefore I will plant accomplishments and successes, and I will do this by remembering that nothing can exist in the future that I do not want to be there. (4 Comments |Comment on this) |
| Friday, November 11th, 2005 | |
| _9:14 am_[umpachki] |
This is poor studentry on my part, however, I am in class as I am making this post. The class is called After the Holocaust, you can deduce from the title what we are studying. For the matter of this post though, I went first to the Nirvikalpa first and found nothing. So I ask here – Has Seth addressed the Holocaust? (6 Comments |Comment on this) |
| Wednesday, November 9th, 2005 | |
| _10:45 pm_[effrenata] |
Thoughts on NOLA and Reality Creation I've just had a Sethian moment of insight.Earlier today, I was thumbing through a book on EST which starts out with a little fable about how a rat in a maze will eventually go down a different tunnel when someone moves the cheese, but humans will keep going down the same tunnel, because they're focused not on finding the cheese but on going down the right tunnel.Then, while doing my daily exercises, I listened to the mp3 "Katrina and Central Socialist Planning" (available for free on this page.) It documents the incredible blunders and ineptitude shown by the federal & other levels of government in handling the hurricane crisis, such as forbidding volunteers to help because they weren't doing things the "federally approved" way. In other words, it was all about going down the "right" tunnel instead of the tunnel with the cheese.And something went 'click'.I'd been wondering why I'd created a reality with an event like NOLA in it. I imagine a lot of you have been wondering the same thing, and perhaps finding some of your own answers. The answer, for me, has become quite obvious. I've done the cheese and tunnel thing myself. The idea that there is a "right" way to do things, one approved by official, authoritarian belief systems, upheld by the power of state, tradition and society -- there's part of me that still believes that, even though I've come to accept Seth, CYOR, and a variety of other New Age concepts.Like all events, it wouldn't be in my reality if I hadn't put it there for some reason. And in observing this outer reflection, I've increased my understanding of the inner issues that create it. It's like the idea that you're either part of the problem or part of the solution. We all have both the problems and solutions within us, and working on the inner level will enable us to change external reality.I'm curious if anyone here has had similar thoughts, and whether anyone is involved in inner work to change outer reality on a public scale. According to Seth, if each individual confronts the limiting beliefs within herself, and takes the steps needed to change them, this will catalyze the transformation of the external systems as well.With the insights provided by Seth and other New Age sources -- as well from within ourselves -- we can create a society in which we are more than just rats in a maze. Current Mood: Aware (4 Comments |Comment on this) |
| Friday, October 21st, 2005 | |
| _3:41 pm_[donnapamina] |
9-11 as a "Mass Event" In further response to  vivisekt's comment about the flack she took for suggesting that those who perished on 9-11 may have had a hand in their own fate, and as someone who lives in New York and saw the flaming towers first-hand from my office window, it's worth noting that even here, where to many the possibility that nearly 3,000 souls chose a mass-exodus that day is tantamount to sacrilege, there are many others still who are becoming ever more cognizant of the inevitability of that event and our participation in it.Granted, chosen participation (in the sense of agreement in the non-physical realm) is still a hard sell, but I found many circles (Jungian and Buddhist, in particular) that were able to accept that we had, to a degree, allowed it to happen.After all, the towers had been attacked once before, so the notion of their vulnerability was already simmering through the collective unconscious of those who worked there. Plus, as a nation, our arrogance was at an all-time high; even in personal psychological terms, arrogance is often the precursor to tragedy since tragedy is necessary to bring it down to earth (think Icarus plunging into the ocean or the Tower card in Tarot).Now, why those 3,000 people? Well, who knows. Interestingly, I didn't know anyone who died (well, except for one kid from my old JHS whom I neither knew nor liked much). Though I do know several people who experienced miraculous rescues -- one even being pulled safely into a building just as the dust cloud engulfed her.I myself nearly took a job in WTC Two in 2000, but found a better one in midtown. Prior to that, incidentally, I have always worked downtown.These "coincidences," needless to say, accord very well with my worldview, and with my needs at the time: For example, I believe that (as Jane and Rob often stated) that miracles are merely nature unimpeded, and that coincidences are invoked by our strong intentions and desires (hence my friend "summoning" her savior at the right moment). Further, I know that I would have been unable to handle any friends' deaths -- or any greater trauma at all -- since, that year, I was recovering from some serious illnesses (which I had chosen for my own reasons... but that's another story). And so, while I was close to the event, I was "protected" from any serious trauma.In the end, most people don't know enough about what's going on inside their own heads to see their hand in creating their lives. So trying to explain how someone might have chosen their own death is like trying to explain the difference between red and green to someone who is colorblind.Ultimately, it's very difficult to try to introduce a literal- and material-minded person to Seth's concepts. If I find myself drawn into such a conversation, I find it's wisest to stick as much as possible to purely physical terms (as above, with the Jung and Buddhist groups) and leave references to "agreements in non-physical" out of it. (Comment on this) |
| Wednesday, October 19th, 2005 | |
| _2:45 pm_[donnapamina] |
Sethnesia... can anyone help? I've been trying to find a passage that I could swear is in one of the Seth books about a couple who sought help from Seth (or possibly another channeler, but I'm almost certain it was Seth...) after their brilliant son had died suddenly from a "rare blood disorder." Seth (or whomever) told them that the child had been an old friend of theirs over many lifetimes and was in fact much older than they were. He had not initially intended to enter a physical existence, but had been keeping an eye on them as they found each other, married and built their lives together. Noticing that they were stumbling on some fundamental life issues, the friend re-entered physical existence as their son, though he never intended to complete a normal lifespan. Rather he only wanted to prompt them to re-examine their lives and, through his unique presence and unusual death, get them to ask the very questions that they were beginning to ask.A good friend of mine recently lost a child under extremely similar circumstances, and I think that this passage would help him a great deal.Does anyone know what book it might be in?Thanks!! (11 Comments |Comment on this) |
| Tuesday, October 18th, 2005 | |
| _4:15 pm_[elyusium] |
Hi folks,Nice to see a Seth dialog going on in LJ. I never thought to look for a discussion about Seth, Jane and Robs work on LJ for some reason but came across it playing around with the search engine today. As far as the question posed that I linked to by (kittenpaws), unfortunately no, I do not have a circle of friends who are very much interested in the Seth worldview. The people I have met over the years that say they are into Seth have left me with a very unsettled feeling. That is a very general statement however as I have made one or two friends who were very dedicated to trying to implement his worldview into their personal lives. The material has been an enormous source of inspiration and delight for me and I have been able to use the numerous exercises in the books to great advantage.Just a few remarks about some of the ideas I read in the thread. No I do not think of the Seth Material as a religion in any way.The God of Jane was one of the best books I ever read about the god concept excepting perhaps Seths own dialogues on the subject and I have studied religious philosophy.The Ascension site is very interesting and kept me quite entertained last year when I first stumbled across it. The Ra material leaves much to be desired in my opinion and the statements in the Ascension manuscript attributed to Seth are taken way out of context if you ask me. I can also live without the term Harvest, thank you very much. That said, the info on the site is very interesting never the less.And yes, “ the psychedelic experience is primarily expansion of consciousness,” to quote Seth.(early sessions bk.7 pg.217) This is in reference to someone calling the material psychedelic.Unfortunately I have recently deleted all of my previous LJ entries for some reason so there is not much of my experience on here to date. I was following my impulses. I have only recently started posting again.Does anyone mind if I put some of you folks on my friends list?I am going on twenty-five years of reading and rereading the Material myself and was absolutely thrilled Rob got the Personal Sessions out to the public. Reading them was as startling as reading the Seth Material for the first time so many years ago. Frankly, the reason I have reread the books so many times is that the Material is so astute , complex, fascinating and inspirational that it begs many reads just to get a thorough grasp of it. I came to Seth after reading everything I could by Edgar Cayce."What the Bleep" was interesting, though not much new info for me as I am an avid follower of new developments in Physics. I did think the movie could have done very well, or better even, if JZ Knight could have refrained from allowing Ramtha to make any comments. I had the impression the she had something to do with making the movie, but that was only an impression and I have no evidence to prove it. Otherwise I had no idea why she was allowed to speak or what she was talking about. One other thing, anyone who has been deeply touched by the material might want to get a letter out to Rob. He is putting all of the correspondence he has received over the years in the Yale New Haven library and is very good at returning a response to your letter. If you need the address feel free to contact me, though I am not sure I have an email address link to this journal, but if folks here are interested I can put his address on the site. He loves getting mail from people who are using the material for specific challenges in their own lives.peace for nowelyusium or e for short. (11 Comments |Comment on this) |
| Sunday, October 9th, 2005 | |
| _4:09 pm_[umpachki] |
May I ask -Do you conisder Seth a "Religion?"When someone asks who your god is, do you tell them - All That Is? (12 Comments |Comment on this) |
| Monday, September 12th, 2005 | |
| _2:26 pm_[umpachki] |
I'm missing something - here.Just as a matter of discussion, how do you recognize when the Collective Consciousness, or All That Is, is speaking to you?I know the ways I listen, I generally use trees, passing conversations.If I am being too vague here - let me know.I just know that I have a _something_-shaped hole, and my reality is recognizing it, and showing me it's recognition - people do not look at me as much this past week, and I mean that in the sense of - when I look at people, they do not look back, a sense of being invisible almost.This could be me not listening to myself - not really hearing what I am saying to me - but I am not too sure about this, I listen well to myself.I am in this community talking of these things because life is, without a doubt to me - the way Seth speaks that it is, everything is very Yoda, everything is what I create, and I understand our en masse collaborations, I take responsibility for my choices - I just needed to say some of these things to people who know what I am saying, my girlfriend, and some other friends sometimes condemn the Seth Material, and I have no one to talk to about it. (3 Comments |Comment on this) |
| Saturday, August 27th, 2005 | |
| _4:36 am_[effrenata] |
New Community: Freedom of Being I've just started a new community,  freedomofbeing:This community is about conscious self-creation, the freedom to choose one's own identity. Anything pertaining to this topic can be explored here on metaphysical, philosophical, spiritual, artistic, personal, scientific, technological, social, and political levels. What does it mean to have an identity? To construct one's own identity? How does individual identity relate to group identity? What changes can we make in ourselves, and how do these foster changes in society?From the pro- Self Creation point of view, Freedom of Being is the first and most essential of all freedoms, as well as the ultimate freedom. By changing ourselves, we change the world, one person at a time. The only ideology promoted here is the right of each individual to make that choice for her- or himself. (Comment on this) |
| Sunday, August 21st, 2005 | |
| _12:09 pm_[umpachki] |
Introduction - It was about 2 years now since I've started reading Seth.The point of me being introduced to Seth was suicide.I read a lot, I am an English major, leaning toward poetry. This sort of life has been my strive for more than a decade.Seth was given to me by another poet named John, my mentor to life, poetry, art, music.When my mother committed suicide two and a half years ago, John gave me Seth Speaks, and just told me to read it -taking it all to heart, the material Seth gives on suicide is very heart warming. Even though I have no religious faith to begin with, and didn't believe in a hell for suicides to go to - Seth really lay down something better for my mother.So I wonder, is it only Seth Speaks - or has anyone come across more suicide material in other Seth books? (3 Comments |Comment on this) |
[ << Previous 20 ]