Wai-ho Wong黃偉豪 - Profile on Academia.edu (original) (raw)
Uploads
Book Reviews by Wai-ho Wong黃偉豪
Asian Studies Review , 2017
P.S. The book review limits to criticism on the book due to the word limit required by the Journa... more P.S. The book review limits to criticism on the book due to the word limit required by the Journal, though the book is an important reference to the academia. Thank you for the kindest understanding.
Papers by Wai-ho Wong黃偉豪
譯叢(Rendition), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2024
安徽师范大学学报（社会科学版） Journal of Anhui Normal University（Soc.Sci.）, 2024
As a Song literatus， Huang Tingjian only composed two pieces of regulated rhapsody， which are the... more As a Song literatus， Huang Tingjian only composed two pieces of regulated rhapsody， which are the unearthed literary writings collected in his supplementary collection edited by Huang Xun. The trick is that not only Huang Xun's Biography of Huang Tingjian， but also the findings of scholars fail to examine and identify the exact year of these two compositions. For this reason， this paper utilizes both evidence and counterevidence as an approach to shed light on the exact year of writings and put an argument to certain misconceptions in relation to the rigid requirements of imperial examination and relevant rhapsody writings during the Northern Song.
中國學報(Chung Kuk Hak Po 중국학보), 2022
≪管錐編≫是錢鍾書的學術研究結晶，其中有涉及經學者，主要見於≪周易正義≫、≪毛詩正義≫、≪左傳正義≫。此三章體現錢氏對經籍的思辨能力，以及兼採傳統與現代的詮釋方法。總括≪管錐編≫對經學典籍的詮釋... more ≪管錐編≫是錢鍾書的學術研究結晶，其中有涉及經學者，主要見於≪周易正義≫、≪毛詩正義≫、≪左傳正義≫。此三章體現錢氏對經籍的思辨能力，以及兼採傳統與現代的詮釋方法。總括≪管錐編≫對經學典籍的詮釋，大致可以歸結為三點：一，突破傳統經學研究的界限；二，在批判與疑古的前提下，提出個人對經籍的創見；三，以辯證統一的思維模式解經。與此同時，≪管錐編≫的經學論述疑義有三：一，論述似乎忽略實證或歷史文化的一面，以致若干地方產生誤解；二，立論似有概念不清，尤其誤將經籍原意與後人詮釋相混；三，解經似乎偏向複雜，尤其以生僻名物及西方思想來解經。平情而論，≪管錐編≫賦經籍以新的學術生命，突破傳統的訓詁及義理分析，對經學發展具有不容否定的創新價值；但傳統經學的界線被消弭，經籍變成錢氏闡發個人學術思想的一個文本，甚至淪為文藝、文化或哲學的附庸，因而對經學的發展有正反的兩面。
Research of Chinese Literature中国文学研究, 2022
金圣叹有关词之评点罕为人道。存世的《批欧阳永叔词十二首》由于零珪断璧，后人以为仅属金氏偶然性的评点行为。今就所辑，其词学理念偶见其他评点之中。金氏鄙夷词体又选批欧词，应与吴江沈氏交往有关。金氏一... more 金圣叹有关词之评点罕为人道。存世的《批欧阳永叔词十二首》由于零珪断璧，后人以为仅属金氏偶然性的评点行为。今就所辑，其词学理念偶见其他评点之中。金氏鄙夷词体又选批欧词，应与吴江沈氏交往有关。金氏一方面阐发欧词之有别于其他词人词作，另一方面以此证明其形式批评与结构主义的恰当性与可被验证性。即使金批欧词以文艺分析凌驾于文献版本之上，但我们仍可从中窥见欧词的接受面貌，以至金氏文学理念。
中國文學研究, 2020
Key words：Cheng Qianfan；Shen Zufen；Qian Zhongshu；social-politics；love and romance；critical review... more Key words：Cheng Qianfan；Shen Zufen；Qian Zhongshu；social-politics；love and romance；critical review Abstract：Cheng Qianfan and his spouse Shen Zufen are both recognized as renowned Chinese traditional scholars-poets within the academia and literary circle since last century. They both had the high standard in terms of teaching，were good at writing old stylish poems，and had the same experience so they can be compared each other. On one hand， this paper describes the achievements of their poetry mainly reflecting in the origin of their teachers， as well as the sorrow of families and love and feelings. On the other hand， it finds that in the oral literature of modern scholars， Qian zhongshu once commented on their poetry. Based on the above achievements of Cheng and Shen as well as Qian' s comments，this paper makes the critical review of contemporary poetry writing and related appreciation issues.
中國學術年刊, 2012
The studies of the Confucian Classics in Hong Kong are developed and widespread by the mainland s... more The studies of the Confucian Classics in Hong Kong are developed and widespread by the mainland scholars who immigrated to Hong Kong after the establishment of the Republic of China (ROC). This paper discusses the aspect of the studies of the Confucian Classics in Hong Kong since ROC's establishment by looking into CHEN Zhanquan and his social and academic network, which include Xia Shumei, WU Tianren, RAO Zongyi, WU Xianzi, LIANG Hancao, HUANG Weichang and ZHU Zifan, and discovers that the Confucian Classic thoughts that they advocated in the territory are derived from the Qing scholars, or their own ancestors, or self apprehension. What is most significant is that they tried not only to accept or reject the opinions of both ancient and contemporary scholars, but also to put forward more inspirational and modern interpretations on the classics. In addition, this paper suggests two perspectives for academics and scholars to research on the studies of the Confucian Classics in Hong Kong from the ROC establishment onwards: one is Hok Hoi Association of Hong Kong; and the other is Guangdong Wenxian and relevant documents.
Asian Studies Review , 2017
P.S. The book review limits to criticism on the book due to the word limit required by the Journa... more P.S. The book review limits to criticism on the book due to the word limit required by the Journal, though the book is an important reference to the academia. Thank you for the kindest understanding.
譯叢(Rendition), The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2024
安徽师范大学学报（社会科学版） Journal of Anhui Normal University（Soc.Sci.）, 2024
As a Song literatus， Huang Tingjian only composed two pieces of regulated rhapsody， which are the... more As a Song literatus， Huang Tingjian only composed two pieces of regulated rhapsody， which are the unearthed literary writings collected in his supplementary collection edited by Huang Xun. The trick is that not only Huang Xun's Biography of Huang Tingjian， but also the findings of scholars fail to examine and identify the exact year of these two compositions. For this reason， this paper utilizes both evidence and counterevidence as an approach to shed light on the exact year of writings and put an argument to certain misconceptions in relation to the rigid requirements of imperial examination and relevant rhapsody writings during the Northern Song.
中國學報(Chung Kuk Hak Po 중국학보), 2022
≪管錐編≫是錢鍾書的學術研究結晶，其中有涉及經學者，主要見於≪周易正義≫、≪毛詩正義≫、≪左傳正義≫。此三章體現錢氏對經籍的思辨能力，以及兼採傳統與現代的詮釋方法。總括≪管錐編≫對經學典籍的詮釋... more ≪管錐編≫是錢鍾書的學術研究結晶，其中有涉及經學者，主要見於≪周易正義≫、≪毛詩正義≫、≪左傳正義≫。此三章體現錢氏對經籍的思辨能力，以及兼採傳統與現代的詮釋方法。總括≪管錐編≫對經學典籍的詮釋，大致可以歸結為三點：一，突破傳統經學研究的界限；二，在批判與疑古的前提下，提出個人對經籍的創見；三，以辯證統一的思維模式解經。與此同時，≪管錐編≫的經學論述疑義有三：一，論述似乎忽略實證或歷史文化的一面，以致若干地方產生誤解；二，立論似有概念不清，尤其誤將經籍原意與後人詮釋相混；三，解經似乎偏向複雜，尤其以生僻名物及西方思想來解經。平情而論，≪管錐編≫賦經籍以新的學術生命，突破傳統的訓詁及義理分析，對經學發展具有不容否定的創新價值；但傳統經學的界線被消弭，經籍變成錢氏闡發個人學術思想的一個文本，甚至淪為文藝、文化或哲學的附庸，因而對經學的發展有正反的兩面。
Research of Chinese Literature中国文学研究, 2022
金圣叹有关词之评点罕为人道。存世的《批欧阳永叔词十二首》由于零珪断璧，后人以为仅属金氏偶然性的评点行为。今就所辑，其词学理念偶见其他评点之中。金氏鄙夷词体又选批欧词，应与吴江沈氏交往有关。金氏一... more 金圣叹有关词之评点罕为人道。存世的《批欧阳永叔词十二首》由于零珪断璧，后人以为仅属金氏偶然性的评点行为。今就所辑，其词学理念偶见其他评点之中。金氏鄙夷词体又选批欧词，应与吴江沈氏交往有关。金氏一方面阐发欧词之有别于其他词人词作，另一方面以此证明其形式批评与结构主义的恰当性与可被验证性。即使金批欧词以文艺分析凌驾于文献版本之上，但我们仍可从中窥见欧词的接受面貌，以至金氏文学理念。
中國文學研究, 2020
Key words：Cheng Qianfan；Shen Zufen；Qian Zhongshu；social-politics；love and romance；critical review... more Key words：Cheng Qianfan；Shen Zufen；Qian Zhongshu；social-politics；love and romance；critical review Abstract：Cheng Qianfan and his spouse Shen Zufen are both recognized as renowned Chinese traditional scholars-poets within the academia and literary circle since last century. They both had the high standard in terms of teaching，were good at writing old stylish poems，and had the same experience so they can be compared each other. On one hand， this paper describes the achievements of their poetry mainly reflecting in the origin of their teachers， as well as the sorrow of families and love and feelings. On the other hand， it finds that in the oral literature of modern scholars， Qian zhongshu once commented on their poetry. Based on the above achievements of Cheng and Shen as well as Qian' s comments，this paper makes the critical review of contemporary poetry writing and related appreciation issues.
中國學術年刊, 2012
The studies of the Confucian Classics in Hong Kong are developed and widespread by the mainland s... more The studies of the Confucian Classics in Hong Kong are developed and widespread by the mainland scholars who immigrated to Hong Kong after the establishment of the Republic of China (ROC). This paper discusses the aspect of the studies of the Confucian Classics in Hong Kong since ROC's establishment by looking into CHEN Zhanquan and his social and academic network, which include Xia Shumei, WU Tianren, RAO Zongyi, WU Xianzi, LIANG Hancao, HUANG Weichang and ZHU Zifan, and discovers that the Confucian Classic thoughts that they advocated in the territory are derived from the Qing scholars, or their own ancestors, or self apprehension. What is most significant is that they tried not only to accept or reject the opinions of both ancient and contemporary scholars, but also to put forward more inspirational and modern interpretations on the classics. In addition, this paper suggests two perspectives for academics and scholars to research on the studies of the Confucian Classics in Hong Kong from the ROC establishment onwards: one is Hok Hoi Association of Hong Kong; and the other is Guangdong Wenxian and relevant documents.
周建渝、張洪年、張雙慶編：《重讀經典：中國傳統小說與戲曲的多重透視》（Hong Kong: Oxford University Press）, 2009
韓國《中國學報》중국학보, 2019
一、明末科舉的變形與夾縫中的士人 中國古代社會結構，當以在位爲官作爲封建體制身份顯赫的外在表徵。對於並無特殊 門蔭關係的一般平民來說，科舉是通向仕宦之途的必要途徑，而此一途徑相對於門蔭等關係 來... more 一、明末科舉的變形與夾縫中的士人 中國古代社會結構，當以在位爲官作爲封建體制身份顯赫的外在表徵。對於並無特殊 門蔭關係的一般平民來說，科舉是通向仕宦之途的必要途徑，而此一途徑相對於門蔭等關係 來說，是可靠個人努力而爭取通過科舉，進入仕宦之途，所以科舉存在一定的公平性，而這 多爲四民之首的士人所青睞。問題是：如果科舉幾乎成了通向仕宦之途的唯一途徑，而科舉 要求又愈趨嚴苛、機械，以至失去原意與意義，這究竟對士人會有甚麼影響？對士人來說又 具有甚麼意義？他們會有甚麼心理？他們會如何回應？似乎頗爲值得思考。明末科舉正正具 有以上與科舉之設原意背道而馳的扭曲現象，我們不妨以此作爲探討的焦點，並以金聖歎爲 個案分析。 當然，科舉在明末之前只是其中一個取士方法，而不是唯一的方法。考明代取士凡三 變： （一）明初科舉、貢舉、薦舉三途並用，其中薦舉爲貴，貢舉次之，科舉爲輕； （二）明中期後，專重科舉，貢舉日輕，而薦舉則近乎不行； * 樹仁大學中國語言文學系助理教授
林慶彰,蔣秋華編：<<變動時代的經學與經學家 ──民國時期（1912-1949）經學研究>>（台北：萬卷樓）, 2014
單周堯編：<<東西方文化>>（上海古籍出版社）, 2011
文學師承與詩歌推演——南宋中興詩壇的師門與師法（上海古籍出版社）, 2015
國文天地(The World of Chinese Language and Literature), 2022
An excerpt of English-Chinese translation on Richard Powers's The Overstory