Smarter medicine: do physicians need political pressure to eliminate useless interventions? (original) (raw)

Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Review article: Biomedical intelligence

Vol. 145 No. 1314 (2015)

Summary

Echoing the “less is more” and “choosing wisely” campaigns in the USA, the “smarter medicine” campaign launched in 2014 by the Swiss Society of General Internal Medicine listed five tests or treatments that are often prescribed in ambulatory general internal medicine, but that may not provide any meaningful benefit and may carry the risk of generating harms and costs.

In the United Kingdom, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) supported the National Health Services in identifying “low value” activities that should be stopped. Political pressure and stringent regulatory measures for pharmaceuticals and medical technology triggered major controversy and opposition. NICE efforts now concentrate on editing guidelines based on consensus techniques, which integrate the evidence from systematic reviews with social values and patient preferences. To obtain significant changes and promote the paradigm of reducing unnecessary waste of medical resources, opinion leaders and leading scientific or academic institutions, as well as medical societies, can make a difference, together with consumer associations and the lay press. Politicians can undoubtedly contribute to the success of these strategies, but rather than putting physicians alone under pressure and setting up stringent regulatory measures, they should network with all stakeholders and put emphasis on a broader agenda, the one of improving healthcare quality and efficiency.

References

  1. Selby K, Cornuz J, Neuner-Jehle S, Perrier A, Zeller A, Meier CA, et al. “Smarter medicine”: 5 interventions à éviter en médecine interne générale ambulatoire. Schweizerische Aerzte Zeitung. 2014;2014:95:20. French
  2. Illich I. Limits to medicine. London: Marion Boyars, 1976.
  3. Moynihan R, Smith R. Too much medicine? Almost certainly. BMJ. 2002;324:859–60.
  4. Glasziou P, Moynihan R, Richards T, Godlee F. Too much medicine; too little care. Time to wind back the harms of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. BMJ. 2013;346:f1271.
  5. Choosing wisely: an initiative of the ABIM Foundation. 2013 http://www.choosingwisely.org
  6. Garner S, Littlejohns P. Disinvestment from low value clinical interventions: NICELY done? BMJ. 2011;343:d4519.
  7. Sustainable Medicine. Position paper of the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences, 2012.
  8. Amstad, Gaspoz JM, Zemp L. Guidelines and choosing wisely: to do’s and not to do’s. Schweizerische Aerzte Zeitung 2015;96(5):130–131. German.
  9. Donaldson L. On the state of the public health: annual report of the chief medical officer 2005. Department of Health, 2005.
  10. NICE. Disinvestment project plan, 20 February 2006. http://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/whoweare//seniormanagementteam/meetings/2006/21february2006/disinvestment_project_plan_20_february_2006_version_1.jsp.
  11. Elshaug AG, Hiller JE, Tunis SR, Moss JR. Challenges in Australian policy processes for disinvestment form existing, ineffective health care practices. Aust N Z Health Policy 2007;4:23.
  12. NICE. Cost savings. http://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/whawedo/niceandthenhs/CostSaving.jsp.
  13. Rohack JJ. American Medical Association president’s address the AMA House of Delegates, Houston, November 7, 2009 http://www.ama.assn.org/assets/meeting/mm/rohack-speech.pdf)
  14. Brody H. Medicine’s ethical responsibility for Health Care Reform – The Top five list. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(4):283–85.
  15. ABIM Foundation. Medical professionalism in the New Millenium: A Physican Charter 2002. http://www.abimfoundation.org/Professionalism/~/media/Files/Physician%20Charter.ashx http://www.abimfoundation.org/Professionalism/~/media/Files/Physician Charter.ashx.
  16. The Good Stewardship Working Group. Online first / Less is more. The “Top 5” lists in primary care. Meeting the Responsibility of professionalism. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(15):1385–90.
  17. Grady D. The “Top 5” Health care activities for which less is more. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(15):1390–91.
  18. Volpp KG, Loewenstein G, Asch DA. Choosing wisely. Low-value services, utilization, and patient cost-sharing. JAMA. 2012;308(16):1635–6.
  19. Tilburt JC, Wynia MK, Sheeler RD, Thorsteinsdottir B, James KM, Egginton JS, et al. Views of US physicians about controlling health care costs. JAMA. 2013;310(4):380–88.
  20. Zuercher Caroline. Ces examens inutiles. La Société Suisse de Médecine Interne Générale déconseille cinq tests aux praticiens. Tribune de Genève, 15 mai 2014.
  21. Sacco F. L’abus de médecine peut nuire à la santé. Le Temps, 21 novembre 2014. French.
  22. Brody H. From an ethics of rationing to an ethics of waste avoidance. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(21):1949–51.

Most read articles by the same author(s)