Craig Dudczak | Syracuse University (original) (raw)

Papers by Craig Dudczak

Research paper thumbnail of Familiarity as a variable in anticipated communication

Research paper thumbnail of Direct Refutation in Propositions of Policy: A Viable Alternative

Argumentation and Advocacy, 1980

Research paper thumbnail of Debate Philosophy Statements as Predictors of Critic Attitudes: A Summary and Direction of Research

Research paper thumbnail of Prediction of Solvency in Affirmative Plans: The Burden of Policy Advocates

Research paper thumbnail of Coping with Information Overload: Generic Argument as the Least Common Denominator

Research paper thumbnail of The Elements of CEDA Debate Paradigms: An Investigation of Paradigm Accuracy

Research paper thumbnail of Argument of the Excluded Middle: The Jackson-Falwell Apartheid Debate

Research paper thumbnail of An Inverse Inference Model of Evidence

Research paper thumbnail of An Inverse Inference Model of Evidence

Research paper thumbnail of Heuristic Elements of Plausible Reasoning

Research paper thumbnail of A Comparative Analysis of the Predictive Validity of Questionnaires and Philosophy Statements in CEDA Debate

Research paper thumbnail of Coping with Information Overload as Adaptive Behavior in Competitive Debate

When the amount of available information exceeds the ability of the user to process it, "inf... more When the amount of available information exceeds the ability of the user to process it, "information overload" is created. In an attempt to maintain some control over the quantity of arguments they may face, debaters have developed adaptive behavior, primarily through the generic argument--any argument within a "deliverative" framework that recurs in fulfilling the discovery of issues. Using the generic argument's standard content or form, the debater can develop arguments that are familiar in their content or function as an aid to the audience's understanding of the issues. This definition has several implications. First, any issue or argument may become generic through the argument's analytic function or repetition of content. Second, generic argument is not an impediment to the discovery of new arguments. Finally, generic argument does not impede other adaptive responses to overload. Other fields will develop responses appropriate to their needs. (...

Research paper thumbnail of as Adaptive Behavior in Competitive De'ate

Research paper thumbnail of Breaking the News: How the Media Undermine American Democracy. By James Fallows

Argumentation and Advocacy

Research paper thumbnail of Anticipation of Communication with Familiar and Unfamiliar Persons

Research paper thumbnail of Techniques of Social Influence: The Psychology of GainingCompliance, by Dariusz Dolinski

Southern Communication Journal, 2016

Research paper thumbnail of A Taxonomy of CEDA Debate Critics

Research paper thumbnail of Coping with Information Overload as Adaptive Behavior in Competitive Debate

Research paper thumbnail of Philosophy and Reality at a Research University

Research paper thumbnail of Scenario-Testing: Decision Rules for Evaluating Conflicting Probabilistic Claims

Research paper thumbnail of Familiarity as a variable in anticipated communication

Research paper thumbnail of Direct Refutation in Propositions of Policy: A Viable Alternative

Argumentation and Advocacy, 1980

Research paper thumbnail of Debate Philosophy Statements as Predictors of Critic Attitudes: A Summary and Direction of Research

Research paper thumbnail of Prediction of Solvency in Affirmative Plans: The Burden of Policy Advocates

Research paper thumbnail of Coping with Information Overload: Generic Argument as the Least Common Denominator

Research paper thumbnail of The Elements of CEDA Debate Paradigms: An Investigation of Paradigm Accuracy

Research paper thumbnail of Argument of the Excluded Middle: The Jackson-Falwell Apartheid Debate

Research paper thumbnail of An Inverse Inference Model of Evidence

Research paper thumbnail of An Inverse Inference Model of Evidence

Research paper thumbnail of Heuristic Elements of Plausible Reasoning

Research paper thumbnail of A Comparative Analysis of the Predictive Validity of Questionnaires and Philosophy Statements in CEDA Debate

Research paper thumbnail of Coping with Information Overload as Adaptive Behavior in Competitive Debate

When the amount of available information exceeds the ability of the user to process it, "inf... more When the amount of available information exceeds the ability of the user to process it, "information overload" is created. In an attempt to maintain some control over the quantity of arguments they may face, debaters have developed adaptive behavior, primarily through the generic argument--any argument within a "deliverative" framework that recurs in fulfilling the discovery of issues. Using the generic argument's standard content or form, the debater can develop arguments that are familiar in their content or function as an aid to the audience's understanding of the issues. This definition has several implications. First, any issue or argument may become generic through the argument's analytic function or repetition of content. Second, generic argument is not an impediment to the discovery of new arguments. Finally, generic argument does not impede other adaptive responses to overload. Other fields will develop responses appropriate to their needs. (...

Research paper thumbnail of as Adaptive Behavior in Competitive De'ate

Research paper thumbnail of Breaking the News: How the Media Undermine American Democracy. By James Fallows

Argumentation and Advocacy

Research paper thumbnail of Anticipation of Communication with Familiar and Unfamiliar Persons

Research paper thumbnail of Techniques of Social Influence: The Psychology of GainingCompliance, by Dariusz Dolinski

Southern Communication Journal, 2016

Research paper thumbnail of A Taxonomy of CEDA Debate Critics

Research paper thumbnail of Coping with Information Overload as Adaptive Behavior in Competitive Debate

Research paper thumbnail of Philosophy and Reality at a Research University

Research paper thumbnail of Scenario-Testing: Decision Rules for Evaluating Conflicting Probabilistic Claims