kartonyono rf | Universitas Gadjah Mada (Yogyakarta) (original) (raw)

Related Authors

Boldizsar Nagy

Daniel Gyollai

Marco Puleri

RESPOND HORIZON 2020

Hilal Işık

Edina Lilla Meszaros

Witold Klaus

Witold Klaus

Institute for Legal Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences

Umut Korkut

Vassilis Gerasopoulos

Uploads

Papers by kartonyono rf

Research paper thumbnail of Special Issue Constitutional Dimensions of the Refugee Crisis Hungarian Asylum Law and Policy in 2015-2016: Securitization Instead of Loyal Cooperation

The study describes Hungary's policy towards asylum seekers and refugees in the tense period of 2... more The study describes Hungary's policy towards asylum seekers and refugees in the tense period of 2015-2016 before and after the erection of fences at its southern borders of Hungary. It offers a theoretical explanation of the legal measures and practical actions. After briefly reviewing the factual basis, that is the magnitude of the movements and the number of decisions taken in the EU and in Hungary and the pertinent legal changes in 2015-2016 it elaborates the theoretical fundaments. Securitization majority identitarian populism and crimmigration are invoked as explanatory frames. The paper then reassembles the factual elements under six headings showing them in a new light. These are: denial, deterrence, obstruction, punishment, free riding constituting lack of solidarity and breaching the law (international, European, domestic). Finally the question is raised if all these moves are compatible with the duty of loyal cooperation of Member States with each-other and the EU as prescribed by article Article 4 (3) TEU.

Research paper thumbnail of Special Issue Constitutional Dimensions of the Refugee Crisis Hungarian Asylum Law and Policy in 2015-2016: Securitization Instead of Loyal Cooperation

The study describes Hungary's policy towards asylum seekers and refugees in the tense period of 2... more The study describes Hungary's policy towards asylum seekers and refugees in the tense period of 2015-2016 before and after the erection of fences at its southern borders of Hungary. It offers a theoretical explanation of the legal measures and practical actions. After briefly reviewing the factual basis, that is the magnitude of the movements and the number of decisions taken in the EU and in Hungary and the pertinent legal changes in 2015-2016 it elaborates the theoretical fundaments. Securitization majority identitarian populism and crimmigration are invoked as explanatory frames. The paper then reassembles the factual elements under six headings showing them in a new light. These are: denial, deterrence, obstruction, punishment, free riding constituting lack of solidarity and breaching the law (international, European, domestic). Finally the question is raised if all these moves are compatible with the duty of loyal cooperation of Member States with each-other and the EU as prescribed by article Article 4 (3) TEU.

Log In