Gabriel Vacariu | University of Bucharest (original) (raw)

Papers by Gabriel Vacariu

Dark list with people publishing UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas

August 2024, Unbelievable similar ideas to my ideas, my DARK list

I published my first article in 2002, 2003 (English, Romanian journal on Internet Free), Synthese... more I published my first article in 2002, 2003 (English, Romanian journal on Internet Free), Synthese
(Boston, USA) in 2005, my PhD Thesis, UNSW, Free posted by their staff
https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/entities/publication/2231feb5-7fe6-4ec7-9e2d-caf7ddc1b0f9?fbclid=IwAR2VBIQa2RYHPCJjhuyPGvchIF7icl68MBef3TxY02JnW8XQ7K0hD0mWJ9U, 2008, 2010, 2011, etc. In 2015 a book at Springer (Germany).
I indicate the names of some professors/researchers from 2006 to 2024 who have published very
similar ideas to my ideas (2002-2005-2007-2010). Obviously, there are many others that have to be
included in this list. Anyway, the majority of professors in many countries have been working within
my EDWs perspective in the last years without quoting my name. Obviously, the imperialists have
forbiddenmy name, to be invited to conference, to publish abroad, to get scholarships, etc. They have
no chance, everybody knows about this DARK list. For more details, check my manuscript on
Internet…

I indicate the names of some professors/researchers from 2006 to 2024 who have published very sim... more I indicate the names of some professors/researchers from 2006 to 2024 who have published very similar ideas to my ideas (2002-2005-2007-2010). Obviously, there are many others that have to be included in this list. Anyway, the majority of professors in many countries have been working within my EDWs perspective today without quoting my name. Obviously, the imperialists have forbidden my name, to be invited to conference, to published abroad, to get scholarships, etc. They have no chance, everybody knows about this DARK list. For more details, check my manuscript on Internet…

It is about the existences of EDWs: the microparticles exist in the micro-EW, the electromagnetic... more It is about the existences of EDWs: the microparticles exist in the micro-EW, the electromagnetic waves exist in the field-EW, the macro-objects exist in the macro-EW, one EW does not exist for any EDW. Each mind is an EW which does not exist for any mind-EW, a mind does not exist even for the corresponding body... in this way, I have solved all great problems of Physics (quantum mechanics, dispute between QM and Einstein's general relativity) and Cognitive (Neuro)science... I introduced a new definition of life (=mind, life does not exist for any organism, an entity in the macro_EW)... Spacetime could not have any ontological status because of EDWs. All interpretations of QM were wrong, therefore Einstein criticism was correct (even if IT was missing framework, i.e. EDWs). However, spacetime could not have any ontological status because of EDWs... I rewrote special and general relativity without spacetime, using only motion.

Why does an empire disappear? There are several great cases in the history of humanity regarding ... more Why does an empire disappear? There are several great cases in the history of humanity regarding the disappearance of empires. I will analyze the disappearance of actual empire: USA.

The UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas between Theise and Menas’ ideas (2016) and my ideas (2002-2008) in... more The UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas between Theise and Menas’ ideas (2016) and my ideas (2002-2008) in Physics and Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy (the mind-brain problem, quantum mechanics, etc.) (2016) Theise D. Neil (Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA) and Kafatos C. Menas (bDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; cSchmid College of Science & Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA) (2016), REVIEW - Fundamental awareness: A framework for integrating science, philosophy and metaphysics, in COMMUNICATIVE & INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, VOL. 9, NO. 3, e1155010 (19 pages), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2016.1155010 A friend of mine indicated me the strike similarities between Theise and Kafatos’ ideas in their book (Fundamental awareness: A framework for integrating science, philosophy and metaphysics) and my ideas in 2002-20008! I do not have access to this book, but I investigate...

(May 2022 to 2014) The UNBELIEVABLE similarities between the ideas of some people (2011-2016) and my ideas (2002-2008) in physics (quantum mechanics, cosmology), cognitive neuroscience, philosophy of mind, and philosophy (this manuscript would require a REVOLUTION in international academy environment!), 2022

UNBELIEVABLE, many (hundreds) “great” or small thinkers did the same thing in 2006-2007 and later... more UNBELIEVABLE, many (hundreds) “great” or small thinkers did the same thing in 2006-2007 and later: they published the same ideas, UNBELIEVABLE similar to my ideas from 2002-2005!

SinceDescartesthemind.brainrelat ionhasbeenconceivedwithintwomain approaches: id""t,ty;... more SinceDescartesthemind.brainrelat ionhasbeenconceivedwithintwomain approaches: id""t,ty;";;;;;J"" u"o non-identity perspective' In ourdays' higher and lower analysislo,gu'ii'ution levels of cognitive'syslem are.considered' The main theoretical toor, to, uã:oining Oifr"."n, lÃ,els are ihe searching for an inte'nediary level and tt " em"rg";JË;;.;;il In the followings' we try-to. offer an alternative way of grasping trre mtnJ-úrãin problem based on the role of the human subject as an observer. w" ct*mìtuì the mind and the brain are the same and thus, the finding of anintermediaryu"t*""nthemental |evelstoneuralonesaswel lastheemergence from a lower f"ua toã f igf'er level of the cognitive system t: jYtj T^:"ttost issue'

Die Relativität von " Welt " Wie Pseudoprobleme in den Neurowissenschaften, der... more Die Relativität von " Welt " Wie Pseudoprobleme in den Neurowissenschaften, der Psychologie und der Quantenphysik durch EDWs zu vermeiden sind Reihe: Edition Centaurus – Psychologie ▶ Das Buch liefert ein neues axiomatisch-hyperontologisches Framework zum Verständnis der " Welt " und den Zugängen verschiedener Wissenschaften ▶ Zeigt Zusammenhang und Unterschiede bei den Grundbegriffen von Philososophie, Psychologie, Neurowissenschaft, Physik ▶ Beschreibt Theorieapplikationen in der Philosophie des Geistes, Neurowissenschaften, Psychologie, Allgemeiner und spezieller Relatitivitätstheorie sowie der Quantenmechanik Das Werk zeigt, inwiefern ein naives Verständnis von " Welt " der Komplexität moderner Wissenschaften nicht gerecht wird. Es liefert einen wissenschaftstheoretischen Rahmen, in dem die interdisziplinären Fragestellungen von Psychologie, Neurowissenschaften, Biologie und Quantenphysik verstanden werden können, ohne in Aporien zu führen. Auf diese Weise trägt der Autor dazu bei, dass Grundlagenprobleme wie der Zusammenhang von Körper und Geist, Gehirn und Bewusstsein oder die Lokalisierung physikalischer Objekte in Raum und Zeit angemessen verstanden werden können. Entscheidend ist dabei der jeweilige Bezugsrahmen, der zu beachten ist: Epistemisch verschiedene Welten (Epistemological Different Worlds, abgekürzt EDWs) helfen, hypertrophe Begriffe (Scheinwelten) einer " realen Welt " ab-bzw. in die jeweiligen Schranken zu verweisen.

Dark list with people publishing UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas

August 2024, Unbelievable similar ideas to my ideas, my DARK list

Amazon, 2022

Acest roman este o continuare a povestilor din "Viata lui G." (dar romanul se poate citit fara sa... more Acest roman este o continuare a povestilor din "Viata lui G." (dar romanul se poate citit fara sa se fi citit primul roman "Viata lui G."). Sunt alte "povesti" din viata domnului G.

Amazon

Meridiane Print, 2020

Introduction The EDWs perspective, a new general framework of thinking for all physicists! “T... more Introduction

The EDWs perspective, a new general framework of thinking
for all physicists!

“The present situation in physics is as if we know chess, but we don't know one or two rules.”
Richard Feynman

In other works (2002, 2005, 2008, 2011, 2012, 2014, 2015, 2016; Vacariu and Vacariu 2010, 2016a, 2016b), we have showed that the greatest illusion of human knowledge is the notion of “world”, of “uni-verse”, or as we called it, the “Unicorn-world”, and this notion has survived from the oldest times until today. In these works, we have indicated that the “world”, the “Universe” does not exist, but the “Epistemologically Different Worlds” (EDWs) exist (more specifically, for many EDWs, it is about the entities and the interactions which really exist and only represent these EDWs). We emphasize that the EDWs perspective is a new Copernican revolution in human thinking, the greatest movement in Physics, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Philosophy! During the past 15 years, we have applied the EDW paradigm to the main particular sciences and main theories in physics (quantum mechanics, Einstein’s special and general relativity, and the relationship between them), cognitive science (to the main theories like computationalism, connectionism, and the dynamical system approach), cognitive neuroscience, and biology (just to the relationship between life and organism/cell). Also, we showed that the entire Philosophy since Ancient period until now is totally wrong (just because, all philosophical approaches have been constructed within the “Unicorn-world”). This book closes the circle of great topics concerning the main particular sciences (physics, cognitive (neuro)science, and biology) and philosophy grasped in all our previous books (2008-2016): it is about the relationship between the main theories and concepts of Physics vs. the EDWs perspective!
The main theories that we investigate in this and our previous works have been created within the Unicorn-world, therefore, all these approaches have been quite wrong. Some of these theories have been partially re-write in our previous books (Einstein both relativities, thermodynamics, and our EDWs perspective, see Vacariu and Vacariu 2016, 2017, etc.), but even some notions of these theories were wrong. For instance, in our previous book (2016), we indicated that “spacetime” cannot even exist (spacetime cannot have any kind of ontology!). Therefore, in 2017, re-wrote Einstein’s both relativities without “spacetime”. The majority of theories in Physics have been created within the unicorn world and therefore these theories have been quite wrong or at least the authors of these scientific theories have been used wrong concepts.
This book is a collections of our previous ideas, but we strongly emphasize that some of these idea are quite developed in this work. Therefore, this book can be labeled as: “a philosopher overwriting Physics within a new paradigm, the ‘Epistemologically Different World’ (EDWs) perspective”! We emphasize that some parts of this book are from our previous works (but even so, these parts are modified, we added new paragraphs or sub-chapters), but some parts are new written. In general, the new details of this book are the results of following Presura’s book about Physics (2014) written in Romanian. His book is a general overview of the main theories in Physics. Presura is a physicist who wrote a book about these theories in a quite easy language for large public (also for philosophers). There are quite many paragraphs from Presura’s book that are quoted in our book. We emphasize that Presura’s paragraphs inserted in our book are our translations. Also, we inserted quite many of his ideas but we mentioned his name each time. We apologize if some notions or ideas are wrong translated.
The first Chapter is about the EDWs perspective. In Chapter 2, we introduce more details about the rejection of “spacetime”. In Chapter 3, we insert the ideas from our book Vacariu and Vacariu 2017 about Einstein’s relativity without “spacetime”. However, new paragraphs are introduced in this chapter. In Chapter 4, we are indicating that all alternatives of quantum mechanics have been wrong: parts of this chapter are from our previous works, other parts and paragraphs are new ideas/comments. In Chapter 5, we discuss about the Grand Unified Theory (GUT) and the Theory of Everything (TOE), Big Bang (transformed, according to the EDWs perspective, in many Big Bangs – in this way, we avoid Alan Guth’s empty notion of “inflation” which contradict Einstein’s principle of constant speed of light which cannot be surpassed by anything else). In Chapter 6, we introduce an updated version about the dark matter and the dark energy (in 2016, we published a book about “dark matter/energy, space and time and other pseudo-notions in Cosmology” and in 2020 we published a chapter in a book edited by the physicist Michael Smith - see the bibliography. We mention that, in that book, except our chapter, all the other chapters are written by physicists!). For instance, in section 6.4, we introduce a new alternative to dark energy and dark matter, an alternative that is different even from this updated approach! In Chapter 7, we furnish more details about the non-existence of “hyperspace” and the futility of the “superstring theory”. In Chapter 8 in indicate the clear great distinction between our EDWs and Primas and Atmanspascher’s approach (under Spinoza’s “dual aspects” approach and Bohr’s “complementarity” constructed within the unicorn world). In the last chapter, chapter 9, we analysis Rovelli’s rejection of “spacetime” (based on Einstein’s general relativity) within the unicorn world. We rejected the ontology of “spacetime”, but our argument is totally different than Rovelli’s argument. Moreover, we indicate that Rovelli’s argument is quite wrong, constructed within the unicorn world.
As a conclusion, we emphasize that we have overwritten the main theories, ideas and concepts of Physics within the new Copernican framework of thinking, the EDWs perspective. The umbrella under which we have been working indicates that the great problems of Physics are pseudo-problems constructed within the wrong framework, the “Unicorn world” (the Universe/world) which does not really exist. Therefore, we have to replace the unicorn world with the EDWs! At the end of our Introduction, we mention that that have been many physicists, cognitive neuroscientists and philosophers who have published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to our ideas long time after our ideas being published!).[ Discovering the EDWs, Gabriel Vacariu HAS CHANGED EVERYTHING in human knowledge! His EDWs is the greatest CHALLENGE in the history of human thinking. Many people have published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to our ideas long time after we published and posted our first works on Internet. About the UNBELIEVABLE SIMILARITIES here: https://www.academia.edu/s/0c1502ea90
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340621608_April_2020_2014_Gabriel_Vacariu_UNBELIEVABLE_similarities_odf
https://philpapers.org/rec/VACAT-2
All our main ideas (the mind-brain problem, main problems of cognitive science and quantum mechanics, Einstein’s relativity vs. quantum mechanics, etc.) from my Springer’s book (2016) can be found in my PhD thesis (2007), UNSW (Sydney, Australia, posted on university’s website, free, by the university’s team in 2007) https://www.unsworks.unsw.edu.au/primo-explore/fulldisplay?vid=UNSWORKS&docid=unsworks_5143&context=L
Nobody discovered the EDWs during 2500 years, Gabriel Vacariu discovered them in 2002 (first publication), 2003 and 2005. Amazing, in the last years, many people also “discovered” the existence of EDWs! Statistically, it is quite impossible, so many people (hundreds!) to “discover” the EDWs! (Don’t forget, we have been working within the Internet’s world, therefore, communication is much faster than 20 years ago...) “I don't care that they stole my idea. I care that they don't have any of their own… The present is theirs; the future, for which I really worked, is mine.” (Nikolai Tesla) What these authors have been missing comparing with Gabriel Vacariu? They have been either physicists or cognitive neuroscientists or philosophers while Gabriel Vacariu is a philosopher working Cognitive Neuroscience and Physics! This is the main reason they have been unable to discover the EDWs and to think and write the “Metaphysics of EDWs” (our book 2019)!] It is not something surprising since the EDWs has changed everything in human knowledge! Therefore, we end this chapter with this paragraph:

“The distance between the pioneers and the much smaller followers becomes so great that the latter cannot reach the former; the age of servile imitation begins – yet not of nature, but of the style of the great masters, zealous copyists remove the labels from the elixirs of the Magi and put them on their vials.” (Arnold Gehlen, Images of time)

Over the last two centuries, the relationship between philosophy and science has completely broke... more Over the last two centuries, the relationship between philosophy and science has completely broken down, so the question we are confronted with is: How can we develop a new philosophy, which will influence science decisively? The physicists of the last century rejected their contemporary philosophy. They considered that “philosophy today is dead” (Hawking and Mlodinow 2010). However, we believe that the great scientific problems are always philosophical, and only philosophical problems. Therefore, these problems can be solved only by philosophers and scientists who operate at the greatest level of thinking: that of the “paradigm of thinking”. In fact, these great scientific problems can usually be solved by changing the “paradigm of thinking” for scientists.
This book furnished more applications of the “epistemologically different worlds” (that replaced the “world”/”universe” – in their previous books (2008, 2010, 2011, etc.), the authors indicated that the notion of the world/universe is wrong). Following Aristotle’s “Prime Mover” (or the “Unmoved Mover”), we stop the regress ad infinitum by discovering the first EW, the EW0 (the Hypernothing). Even if one EW does not exist for any EDW, the Hypernothing was the first EW and all other EDWs correspond to the EW0. Chapter 2 is about the “Hypernothing”. The other chapters continue our works of applying the EDWs to different concepts/areas of Physics: quantum mechanics, elementary particles, thermodynamics (with its main notion, “entropy”), etc. In the last chapter, knowing that Einstein’s special and general theory of relativity are very correct (but in a book 2016 we showed that “spacetime” cannot ontologically exist), we re-write both theories without “spacetime”.
Content, Introduction and Chapter 1, FREE at https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_1?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=gabriel+vacariu&rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3Agabriel+vacariu

Dark matter and dark energy, space and time, and other pseudo-notions in cosmology, Datagro... more 2016) Dark matter and dark energy, space and time, and other pseudo-notions in cosmology, Datagroup Dark matter and dark energy. Two notions that have troubled cosmologists for a long time. Why? Because they don't have a " satisfactory " definition, and nobody can identify the " matter " or " forces " that govern them. Currently, we can only deduce the existence of these two notions from the strange movement of the galaxies and the manner they move away from one another, with increasing speed. However, these are not the only mysteries that cosmology cannot yet explain. What happened before the Big Bang? Is the universe still expanding (cosmic inflation)? What is the relation between the theory of relativity and the laws of quantum mechanics? What if the answers to all these questions were far more accessible than researchers thought? What if the real " culprit " for their absence was in fact the framework used by cosmologists, a framework that involves the existence of space and time? With the help of the Epistemologically Different Worlds paradigm, Gabriel and Mihai Vacariu aim to offer an answer to all these questions and many others. Conclusion of this book at http://filosofie.unibuc.ro/cv_gabriel_vacariu/conclusion-2016-vacariu-and-vacariu-dark-matter/

Revista Timpul, 2023

I investigate the main concepts and interpretations of quantum mechanics under my approach: the E... more I investigate the main concepts and interpretations of quantum mechanics under my approach: the Epistemologically Different Worlds. I indicate that almost all concepts and interpretations have been quite wrong being constructed within a wrong framework, the Universe/world.

Revista Timpul, 2023

Unbelievable similar ideas to my ideas published long before them. Thousands of professors....

Unbelievable similarities

Domnul G. continua aventurile sale: de data asta, un Balaur il inghite pe domnul G. si vedem ce s... more Domnul G. continua aventurile sale: de data asta, un Balaur il inghite pe domnul G. si vedem ce se intampla cu el in interiorul acestui fioros Balaur…

In this short article, in the first part, I introduce several principles of the Epistemologically... more In this short article, in the first part, I introduce several principles of the Epistemologically Different Worlds (EDWs) perspective referring to the material things. Then, I will indicate that the origin of everything is, as many physicists presuppose, “nothing”. However, I mention that the “nothing” from the EDWs perspective is something quite different from the common notion of “nothing”. In the next parts, I will shortly present the notions of “energy”, the Big Bangs and matter, dark matter, mind and brain (the observers) within the EDWs perspective.

My name is Gabriel Vacariu (senior professor, Philosophy, Bucharest University, Romania, East Eur... more My name is Gabriel Vacariu (senior professor, Philosophy, Bucharest University, Romania, East Europe). I furnished a new alternative to quantum mechanics, to the mind-brain problem and many other problems. I published my approach in an article at Synthese (2005, USA) and a book 2016 at Springer (Germany) (and many other books and articles in my country and several in other countries). At my webpage you can find FIVE books FREE (all English, 2008-2014) and many articles with my approach.
DISCOVERING THE EDWs (2002), I HAVE COMPLETELY CHANGED THE FRAMEWORK OF HUMAN THINKING!!!! this is the reason, so many "professors" have plagiarized my ideas (see below)!

The main ideas of the EDWs perspective are in Gabriel Vacariu’s PhD thesis posted online by UNSW... more The main ideas of the EDWs perspective are in Gabriel Vacariu’s PhD thesis posted online by UNSW (Australia) in 2007!!! I have realized the GREATEST discovery in the history of human knowledge: the EDWs! This is the reason, I have changed everything in Philosophy, Physics and Cognitive Neuroscience! This has been the main reason, so many people have published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas, many years I published my first works!

UNBELIEVABLE, many (hundreds) “great” or small thinkers did the same thing in 2006-2007 and later! They believe they would be considered co-authors of the same new framework of thinking. The main problem was that many “professors” did the same thing: they plagiarized my ideas and they hurry up to published their work as soon as possible (in 2006-2007, depending when they discovered my article 2005). So, in the same 2 years, many people “discovered” the same new framework of thinking, the EDWs perspective, each of them did not think that there would be so many other people doing the same thing, that is, many people “discovered” the same new framework (the greatest challenge in the history of human thinking!) in the same period! Such coincidences are quite IMPOSSIBLE!! Nobody discovered this framework of thinking 2500 years, and in 2-3 years, many people discovered it!!!! IMPOSSIBLE!!!! In reality, all of them plagiarized my ideas! It was like many people composed Beethoven Fifth’s Symphony, claiming that they never listen Beethoven! Who would be so stupid to believe them?

January 2022 2014 Gabriel Vacariu UNBELIEVABLE , 2022

Many years later, many people (many countries, many domains, many of my ideas – some of them are ... more Many years later, many people (many countries, many domains, many of my ideas – some of them are “great” names from great USA and Germany universities!!) have published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas

UNBELIEVABLE similarities between Rovelli's works (2007 2021) and my works (2002 2007), 2021

There are some UNBELIEVABLE similarities between Rovelli's works (2002-2021) and my works (2002-2... more There are some UNBELIEVABLE similarities between Rovelli's works (2002-2021) and my works (2002-2007)

December II 2021 2014 Gabriel Vacariu UNBELIEVABLE similarities Microsoft, 2021

December 2021 2014 Gabriel Vacariu UNBELIEVABLE similarities , 2021

4 December 2021 2014 Gabriel Vacariu UNBELIEVABLE similarities , 2021

THERE ARE MANY OTHERS PEOPLE who have published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas (2002, 200... more THERE ARE MANY OTHERS PEOPLE who have published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas (2002, 2005, 2007, 2008, etc.)... For a better international academic environment
PLEASE, SHARE this

4 December 2021 2014 Gabriel Vacariu UNBELIEVABLE similarities, 2021

Many people (many countries, domains, topics) have published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ide... more Many people (many countries, domains, topics) have published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas long time after me.

Many people published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas, long time after I published my idea... more Many people published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas, long time after I published my ideas at Synthese (USA, 2005) and Springer (2015) and posted FREE on different webpages!!!!