Henrique Verri | Universidade Paranaense (original) (raw)

Papers by Henrique Verri

Research paper thumbnail of POSSUM escore como preditor de mortalidade em pacientes cirúrgicos

Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 2009

O estudo avaliou a utilização do escore POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for En... more O estudo avaliou a utilização do escore POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity) para predizer a mortalidade na prática cirúrgica.Foram analisados 416 pacientes cirúrgicos com internação na UTI para cuidados de pós-operatório. Foram realizadas comparações entre as taxas de mortalidade predita e observada de acordo com 4 grupos de risco: 0-4%, 5-14%, 15-49%, 50% ou mais, e calculada a área sob a curva ROC do escore POSSUM e APACHE II para a mortalidade. A taxa de mortalidade foi de 22,4%. O escores POSSUM e APACHE II superestimaram o risco de morte, e a área sob a curva ROC do POSSUM foi de 0,762 e a do APACHE II de 0,737, sugerindo a utilização do POSSUM como ferramenta auxiliar na predição de risco de morte em pacientes cirúrgicos.

Research paper thumbnail of Short and medium-term outcomes of patients with and without left ventricular dysfunction submitted to transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva (English Edition), 2015

Background: The increasing use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in high-risk pat... more Background: The increasing use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in high-risk patients, especially those with ventricular dysfunction, justifies further evaluation of the selection and the results of the procedure. A database was used to characterize the profile of patients and evaluate TAVI results according to the degree of ventricular dysfunction. Methods: This was a longitudinal observational study that included all patients with severe aortic stenosis (AoS) submitted to TAVI between 2009 and 2014, comparing those with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% vs. > 40%. The safety and efficacy outcomes were evaluated at 30 days and 1 year. Results: Of the 172 patients, 20 (11.6%) had LVEF ≤ 40%. These patients were younger, with a higher prevalence of smoking, previous acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, permanent pacemaker, and pulmonary artery hypertension. Higher functional classes were also more often observed in this group. The group with LVEF ≤ 40% had lower mean aortic valve gradient for an equivalent valve area. The procedure success did not differ between groups. There were no differences in mortality in coronary and cerebrovascular events, bleeding, vascular complications, and acute renal failure in the 30 day and 1 year follow-up. In the LVEF ≤ 40% group, the mean LVEF increased from 31.5 to 45.1% 1 year after the procedure (p = 0.002). Conclusions: TAVI in patients with severe AoS and LVEF ≤ 40% does not increase the risk of complications and is associated with LVEF improvement.

Research paper thumbnail of Desfechos de curto e médio prazos de pacientes com e sem disfunção ventricular esquerda submetidos ao implante transcateter de prótese valvar aórtica

Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva, 2015

A utilização crescente do implante transcateter de prótese valvar aórtica (TAVI) em pacientes de ... more A utilização crescente do implante transcateter de prótese valvar aórtica (TAVI) em pacientes de alto risco, em especial naqueles com disfunção ventricular, justifica uma avaliação mais profunda da seleção e dos resultados do procedimento. Utilizamos nosso banco de dados para caracterizar o perfil dos pacientes e avaliar os resultados do TAVI de acordo com o grau de disfunção ventricular. Métodos: Estudo observacional longitudinal no qual foram incluídos todos os pacientes com estenose aórtica (EAo) grave, submetidos ao TAVI entre 2009 e 2014, e comparados àqueles com fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo (FEVE) ≤ 40% vs. > 40%. Foram avaliados os desfechos de segurança e eficácia em 30 dias e 1 ano. Resultados: Dentre os 172 pacientes, 20 (11,6%) apresentavam FEVE ≤ 40%. Esses pacientes eram mais jovens, com maior prevalência de tabagismo, infarto agudo do miocárdio prévio, cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica, marca-passo definitivo e hipertensão arterial pulmonar. Também se observou, nesse grupo, maior frequência de classes funcionais mais elevadas. O grupo com FEVE ≤ 40% apresentou menor gradiente valvar aórtico médio para área valvar equivalente. As taxas de sucesso do procedimento não diferiram entre os grupos. Não foram observadas diferenças na mortalidade, nos eventos coronarianos, cerebrovasculares, sangramentos, complicações vasculares e disfunção renal aguda no acompanhamento de 30 dias e 1 ano. No grupo FEVE ≤ 40%, a média da FEVE elevou-se de 31,5 para 45,1% 1 ano após o procedimento (p = 0,002). Conclusões: O TAVI em pacientes com EAo grave e FEVE ≤ 40% não aumenta o risco de complicações e está associado à melhora da FEVE.

Research paper thumbnail of Prognostic Echocardiographic Data in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis

ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA - IMAGEM CARDIOVASCULAR, 2015

Aortic stenosis is the most common valve disease in developed countries and a valvular disease of... more Aortic stenosis is the most common valve disease in developed countries and a valvular disease of growing importance in developing countries. In the natural history of the disease, the onset of symptoms correlates with significant worsening in prognosis and aortic valve replacement is the only procedure capable of changing the survival of these symptomatic patients. However, treatment of patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis is still controversial as, classically speaking, the risks of surgery seemed to outweigh the benefit offered by valve replacement in these individuals. The importance of echocardiography in the early detection of aortic stenosis, in the classification of its severity and in its evolutional follow-up is already established. The objective of this study is to discuss how echocardiographic data help evaluate the risk in the asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis and thus facilitate its clinical management.

Research paper thumbnail of Incidence and risk factors for sepsis in surgical patients: a cohort study

Critical Care, 2011

Introduction Noninvasive ventilation is a safe and eff ective method to treat acute respiratory f... more Introduction Noninvasive ventilation is a safe and eff ective method to treat acute respiratory failure, minimizing the respiratory workload and oxygenation. Few studies compare the effi cacy of diff erent types of noninvasive ventilation interfaces and their adaptation. Objective To identify the most frequently noninvasive ventilation interfaces used and eventual problems related to their adaptation in critically ill patients. Methods We conducted an observational study, with patients older than 18 years old admitted to the intensive care and step-down units of the Albert Einstein Jewish Hospital that used noninvasive ventilation. We collected data such as reason to use noninvasive ventilation, interface used, scheme of noninvasive ventilation used (continuously, periods or nocturnal use), adaptation, and reasons for nonadaptation. Results We evaluated 245 patients with a median age of 82 years (range of 20 to 107 years). Acute respiratory failure was the most frequent cause of noninvasive ventilation used (71.3%), followed by pulmonary expansion (10.24%), after mechanical ventilation weaning (6.14%) and sleep obstructive apnea (8.6%). The most frequently used interface was total face masks (74.7%), followed by facial masks in 24.5% of the patients, and 0.8% used performax masks. The use of noninvasive ventilation for periods (82.4%) was the most common scheme of use, with 10.6% using it continuously and 6.9% during the nocturnal period only. Interface adaptation occurred in 76% of the patients; the 24% that did not adapt had their interface changed to improve adaptation afterwards. The total face mask had 75.5% of interface adaptation, the facial mask had 80% and no adaptation occurred in patients that used the performax mask. The face format was the most frequent cause of nonadaptation in 30.5% of the patients, followed by patient's related discomfort (28.8%), air leaking (27.7%), claustrophobia (18.6%), noncollaborative patient (10.1%), patient agitation (6.7%), facial trauma or lesion (1.7%), type of mask fi xation (1.7%), and 1.7% patients with other causes. Conclusion Acute respiratory failure was the most frequent reason for noninvasive ventilation use, with the total face mask being the most frequent interface used. The most common causes of interface nonadaptation were face format, patient-related discomfort and air leaking, showing improvement of adaptation after changing the interface used. P2 Exercise training reduces oxidative damage in skeletal muscle of septic rats

Research paper thumbnail of POSSUM escore como preditor de mortalidade em pacientes cirúrgicos

Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 2009

O estudo avaliou a utilização do escore POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for En... more O estudo avaliou a utilização do escore POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity) para predizer a mortalidade na prática cirúrgica.Foram analisados 416 pacientes cirúrgicos com internação na UTI para cuidados de pós-operatório. Foram realizadas comparações entre as taxas de mortalidade predita e observada de acordo com 4 grupos de risco: 0-4%, 5-14%, 15-49%, 50% ou mais, e calculada a área sob a curva ROC do escore POSSUM e APACHE II para a mortalidade. A taxa de mortalidade foi de 22,4%. O escores POSSUM e APACHE II superestimaram o risco de morte, e a área sob a curva ROC do POSSUM foi de 0,762 e a do APACHE II de 0,737, sugerindo a utilização do POSSUM como ferramenta auxiliar na predição de risco de morte em pacientes cirúrgicos.

Research paper thumbnail of Short and medium-term outcomes of patients with and without left ventricular dysfunction submitted to transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva (English Edition), 2015

Background: The increasing use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in high-risk pat... more Background: The increasing use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in high-risk patients, especially those with ventricular dysfunction, justifies further evaluation of the selection and the results of the procedure. A database was used to characterize the profile of patients and evaluate TAVI results according to the degree of ventricular dysfunction. Methods: This was a longitudinal observational study that included all patients with severe aortic stenosis (AoS) submitted to TAVI between 2009 and 2014, comparing those with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% vs. > 40%. The safety and efficacy outcomes were evaluated at 30 days and 1 year. Results: Of the 172 patients, 20 (11.6%) had LVEF ≤ 40%. These patients were younger, with a higher prevalence of smoking, previous acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, permanent pacemaker, and pulmonary artery hypertension. Higher functional classes were also more often observed in this group. The group with LVEF ≤ 40% had lower mean aortic valve gradient for an equivalent valve area. The procedure success did not differ between groups. There were no differences in mortality in coronary and cerebrovascular events, bleeding, vascular complications, and acute renal failure in the 30 day and 1 year follow-up. In the LVEF ≤ 40% group, the mean LVEF increased from 31.5 to 45.1% 1 year after the procedure (p = 0.002). Conclusions: TAVI in patients with severe AoS and LVEF ≤ 40% does not increase the risk of complications and is associated with LVEF improvement.

Research paper thumbnail of Desfechos de curto e médio prazos de pacientes com e sem disfunção ventricular esquerda submetidos ao implante transcateter de prótese valvar aórtica

Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva, 2015

A utilização crescente do implante transcateter de prótese valvar aórtica (TAVI) em pacientes de ... more A utilização crescente do implante transcateter de prótese valvar aórtica (TAVI) em pacientes de alto risco, em especial naqueles com disfunção ventricular, justifica uma avaliação mais profunda da seleção e dos resultados do procedimento. Utilizamos nosso banco de dados para caracterizar o perfil dos pacientes e avaliar os resultados do TAVI de acordo com o grau de disfunção ventricular. Métodos: Estudo observacional longitudinal no qual foram incluídos todos os pacientes com estenose aórtica (EAo) grave, submetidos ao TAVI entre 2009 e 2014, e comparados àqueles com fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo (FEVE) ≤ 40% vs. > 40%. Foram avaliados os desfechos de segurança e eficácia em 30 dias e 1 ano. Resultados: Dentre os 172 pacientes, 20 (11,6%) apresentavam FEVE ≤ 40%. Esses pacientes eram mais jovens, com maior prevalência de tabagismo, infarto agudo do miocárdio prévio, cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica, marca-passo definitivo e hipertensão arterial pulmonar. Também se observou, nesse grupo, maior frequência de classes funcionais mais elevadas. O grupo com FEVE ≤ 40% apresentou menor gradiente valvar aórtico médio para área valvar equivalente. As taxas de sucesso do procedimento não diferiram entre os grupos. Não foram observadas diferenças na mortalidade, nos eventos coronarianos, cerebrovasculares, sangramentos, complicações vasculares e disfunção renal aguda no acompanhamento de 30 dias e 1 ano. No grupo FEVE ≤ 40%, a média da FEVE elevou-se de 31,5 para 45,1% 1 ano após o procedimento (p = 0,002). Conclusões: O TAVI em pacientes com EAo grave e FEVE ≤ 40% não aumenta o risco de complicações e está associado à melhora da FEVE.

Research paper thumbnail of Prognostic Echocardiographic Data in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis

ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA - IMAGEM CARDIOVASCULAR, 2015

Aortic stenosis is the most common valve disease in developed countries and a valvular disease of... more Aortic stenosis is the most common valve disease in developed countries and a valvular disease of growing importance in developing countries. In the natural history of the disease, the onset of symptoms correlates with significant worsening in prognosis and aortic valve replacement is the only procedure capable of changing the survival of these symptomatic patients. However, treatment of patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis is still controversial as, classically speaking, the risks of surgery seemed to outweigh the benefit offered by valve replacement in these individuals. The importance of echocardiography in the early detection of aortic stenosis, in the classification of its severity and in its evolutional follow-up is already established. The objective of this study is to discuss how echocardiographic data help evaluate the risk in the asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis and thus facilitate its clinical management.

Research paper thumbnail of Incidence and risk factors for sepsis in surgical patients: a cohort study

Critical Care, 2011

Introduction Noninvasive ventilation is a safe and eff ective method to treat acute respiratory f... more Introduction Noninvasive ventilation is a safe and eff ective method to treat acute respiratory failure, minimizing the respiratory workload and oxygenation. Few studies compare the effi cacy of diff erent types of noninvasive ventilation interfaces and their adaptation. Objective To identify the most frequently noninvasive ventilation interfaces used and eventual problems related to their adaptation in critically ill patients. Methods We conducted an observational study, with patients older than 18 years old admitted to the intensive care and step-down units of the Albert Einstein Jewish Hospital that used noninvasive ventilation. We collected data such as reason to use noninvasive ventilation, interface used, scheme of noninvasive ventilation used (continuously, periods or nocturnal use), adaptation, and reasons for nonadaptation. Results We evaluated 245 patients with a median age of 82 years (range of 20 to 107 years). Acute respiratory failure was the most frequent cause of noninvasive ventilation used (71.3%), followed by pulmonary expansion (10.24%), after mechanical ventilation weaning (6.14%) and sleep obstructive apnea (8.6%). The most frequently used interface was total face masks (74.7%), followed by facial masks in 24.5% of the patients, and 0.8% used performax masks. The use of noninvasive ventilation for periods (82.4%) was the most common scheme of use, with 10.6% using it continuously and 6.9% during the nocturnal period only. Interface adaptation occurred in 76% of the patients; the 24% that did not adapt had their interface changed to improve adaptation afterwards. The total face mask had 75.5% of interface adaptation, the facial mask had 80% and no adaptation occurred in patients that used the performax mask. The face format was the most frequent cause of nonadaptation in 30.5% of the patients, followed by patient's related discomfort (28.8%), air leaking (27.7%), claustrophobia (18.6%), noncollaborative patient (10.1%), patient agitation (6.7%), facial trauma or lesion (1.7%), type of mask fi xation (1.7%), and 1.7% patients with other causes. Conclusion Acute respiratory failure was the most frequent reason for noninvasive ventilation use, with the total face mask being the most frequent interface used. The most common causes of interface nonadaptation were face format, patient-related discomfort and air leaking, showing improvement of adaptation after changing the interface used. P2 Exercise training reduces oxidative damage in skeletal muscle of septic rats