Francesca Dona’ | Università degli Studi di Padova (original) (raw)
Uploads
Papers by Francesca Dona’
Dirittifondamentali.it, 2019
Il presente contributo intende approfondire le recenti prospettive delle dinamiche autonomistiche... more Il presente contributo intende approfondire le recenti prospettive delle dinamiche autonomistiche, con particolare riferimento ai principi di differenziazione e partecipazione. Il percorso avviato dalla Regione Veneto e il caso scozzese offrono numerosi spunti di riflessione in ordine ai nuovi tracciati intrapresi dai cosiddetti “sub-national governments“: il dato emergente dalla comparazione fra gli ordinamenti è che il coinvolgimento dei cittadini e l’esigenza di diversificazione dei territori costituiscono le direttrici principali seguite dagli enti sub-statali. In questa prospettiva, si avrà modo di riflettere anche sul principio di uguaglianza in senso sostanziale, che non si esaurisce nella mera uniformità dei territori e che necessita di un costante riferimento alla realtà dei fatti.
This paper aims to analyze the recent perspectives of autonomistic dynamics, with particular reference to the principles of differentiation and participation. The path launched by the Veneto Region and the Scottish case offer many insights regarding the new routes undertaken by the so-called “sub-national governments”: the elements which emerge from the comparison between the legal systems are the direct involvement of the citizens and the territorial need of diversification. In this perspective, the paper would also consider the principle of equality in its substantive acceptation, which does not mean the mere uniformity of the local territories and requires a continuous reference to the reality.
Consulta online, in www.giurcost.org. , 2019
There is a very close tie which binds the sub-national governments dynamics and the constitutiona... more There is a very close tie which binds the sub-national governments dynamics and the constitutional justice's system, which is evident by Court's role in deciding on the distribution of power issues between the central and the local governments. But, nowadays, the connection throught those two areas is no longer just a problem of separation of responsabilities of the State and the sub-national bodies: to date, this bond reveals a new intimate relationship among the government and the citizens. The analysis of these up-to-date issues can be no longer carried on according to the traditional cathegories of public law: it needs to follow new outlines, which are directly offered by the factual experiences, even in a comparative perspective. This paper aims to introduce and to compare those novel tools, which should be applied to study the phenomenon of sub-national governaments and its effects on the constitutional justice system: starting from the constitutional framework, it has to be considered the differentiation trend of the subnational governments, the innovative decisions of the Supreme or Constitutional Courts about that arrangement and the role of territorial referenda. In that view, the Italian and the British legal systems offer several cues to prove this institutional change put into act and to operate a wider review on the new paradigms of constitutional law based on the recognition of the principles of differentation and pluralism.
Dirittifondamentali.it, 2019
Il presente contributo intende approfondire le recenti prospettive delle dinamiche autonomistiche... more Il presente contributo intende approfondire le recenti prospettive delle dinamiche autonomistiche, con particolare riferimento ai principi di differenziazione e partecipazione. Il percorso avviato dalla Regione Veneto e il caso scozzese offrono numerosi spunti di riflessione in ordine ai nuovi tracciati intrapresi dai cosiddetti “sub-national governments“: il dato emergente dalla comparazione fra gli ordinamenti è che il coinvolgimento dei cittadini e l’esigenza di diversificazione dei territori costituiscono le direttrici principali seguite dagli enti sub-statali. In questa prospettiva, si avrà modo di riflettere anche sul principio di uguaglianza in senso sostanziale, che non si esaurisce nella mera uniformità dei territori e che necessita di un costante riferimento alla realtà dei fatti.
This paper aims to analyze the recent perspectives of autonomistic dynamics, with particular reference to the principles of differentiation and participation. The path launched by the Veneto Region and the Scottish case offer many insights regarding the new routes undertaken by the so-called “sub-national governments”: the elements which emerge from the comparison between the legal systems are the direct involvement of the citizens and the territorial need of diversification. In this perspective, the paper would also consider the principle of equality in its substantive acceptation, which does not mean the mere uniformity of the local territories and requires a continuous reference to the reality.
Consulta online, in www.giurcost.org. , 2019
There is a very close tie which binds the sub-national governments dynamics and the constitutiona... more There is a very close tie which binds the sub-national governments dynamics and the constitutional justice's system, which is evident by Court's role in deciding on the distribution of power issues between the central and the local governments. But, nowadays, the connection throught those two areas is no longer just a problem of separation of responsabilities of the State and the sub-national bodies: to date, this bond reveals a new intimate relationship among the government and the citizens. The analysis of these up-to-date issues can be no longer carried on according to the traditional cathegories of public law: it needs to follow new outlines, which are directly offered by the factual experiences, even in a comparative perspective. This paper aims to introduce and to compare those novel tools, which should be applied to study the phenomenon of sub-national governaments and its effects on the constitutional justice system: starting from the constitutional framework, it has to be considered the differentiation trend of the subnational governments, the innovative decisions of the Supreme or Constitutional Courts about that arrangement and the role of territorial referenda. In that view, the Italian and the British legal systems offer several cues to prove this institutional change put into act and to operate a wider review on the new paradigms of constitutional law based on the recognition of the principles of differentation and pluralism.