Nichole Chang | University of Cebu (original) (raw)

Papers by Nichole Chang

Research paper thumbnail of A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE METHYLENE BLUE REDUCTION TEST AND THE PLATE COUNT WITH CHANGING CONDITIONS OF MILK PRODUCTION AND WITH CHANGING CONDITIONS OF STORAGE OF THE MILK SAMPLES BEFORE TESTING

Journal of Applied Microbiology, 1938

Research paper thumbnail of Hume A Treatise of Human Nature Moral Sentimentalism

Nothing is more usual in philosophy, and even in common life, than to talk of the combat of passi... more Nothing is more usual in philosophy, and even in common life, than to talk of the combat of passion and reason, to give the preference to reason, and to assert that men are only so far virtuous as they conform themselves to its dictates. Every rational creature, 'tis said, is oblig'd to regulate his actions by reason; and if any other motive or principle challenge the direction of his conduct, he ought to oppose it, 'till it be entirely subdu'd, or at least brought to a conformity with that superior principle. On this method of thinking the greatest part of moral philosophy, ancient and modern, seems to be founded; nor is there an ampler field, as well for metaphysical arguments, as popular declamations, than this suppos'd pre-eminence of reason above passion. The eternity, invariableness, and divine origin of the former have been display'd to the best advantage: The blindness, unconstancy and deceitfulness of the latter have been as strongly insisted on. In order to shew the fallacy of all this philosophy, I shall endeavour to prove first, that reason alone can never be a motive to any action of the will; and secondly, that it can never oppose passion in the direction of the will.

Research paper thumbnail of A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE METHYLENE BLUE REDUCTION TEST AND THE PLATE COUNT WITH CHANGING CONDITIONS OF MILK PRODUCTION AND WITH CHANGING CONDITIONS OF STORAGE OF THE MILK SAMPLES BEFORE TESTING

Journal of Applied Microbiology, 1938

Research paper thumbnail of Hume A Treatise of Human Nature Moral Sentimentalism

Nothing is more usual in philosophy, and even in common life, than to talk of the combat of passi... more Nothing is more usual in philosophy, and even in common life, than to talk of the combat of passion and reason, to give the preference to reason, and to assert that men are only so far virtuous as they conform themselves to its dictates. Every rational creature, 'tis said, is oblig'd to regulate his actions by reason; and if any other motive or principle challenge the direction of his conduct, he ought to oppose it, 'till it be entirely subdu'd, or at least brought to a conformity with that superior principle. On this method of thinking the greatest part of moral philosophy, ancient and modern, seems to be founded; nor is there an ampler field, as well for metaphysical arguments, as popular declamations, than this suppos'd pre-eminence of reason above passion. The eternity, invariableness, and divine origin of the former have been display'd to the best advantage: The blindness, unconstancy and deceitfulness of the latter have been as strongly insisted on. In order to shew the fallacy of all this philosophy, I shall endeavour to prove first, that reason alone can never be a motive to any action of the will; and secondly, that it can never oppose passion in the direction of the will.