Juwon Lee | The University of Texas at Austin (original) (raw)

Juwon Lee

Assistant professor in the Department of English Education at Jeonju University, South Korea
Address: http://happyjuwon.wixsite.com/jlee

less

Uploads

Papers by Juwon Lee

Research paper thumbnail of Intentionality and Conative Constructions in English

Research paper thumbnail of Some Activity Predicates as Accomplishments

Juwon Lee. 2016. Some Activity Predicates as Accomplishments. Language and Information 20.2, 117-... more Juwon Lee. 2016. Some Activity Predicates as Accomplishments. Language and Information 20.2, 117-143. In this paper I argue that some "activity" predicates in Korean are actually a kind of accomplishment rather than activity, unlike English counterparts. As evidence for this recategorization, failed attempt interpretation, ambiguity with in-adverbial or keuy 'almost', and non-ambiguity with tasi 'again' are discussed. This type of accomplishment is called activity-accomplishment here and this accomplishment analysis is extended to other kinds of "activity" verbs in Korean, manner of speaking verbs and perception verbs. I also show that in addition to lexical activity-accomplishment, some derived activity-accomplishments involving resultative or causative constructions support the existence of activity-accomplishment in Korean. (Kyung Hee University)

Research paper thumbnail of An Intention-based Account of Accomplishments in Korean

Research paper thumbnail of Two Types of Serial Verb Constructions in Korean: Subject-Sharing and Index-Sharing

In this paper I present an account for the lexical passive Serial Verb Constructions (SVCs) in Ko... more In this paper I present an account for the lexical passive Serial Verb Constructions (SVCs) in Korean. Regarding the issue of how the arguments of an SVC are realized, I propose two hypotheses: i) Korean SVCs are broadly classified into two types, subject-sharing SVCs where the subject is structure-shared by the verbs and index-sharing SVCs where only indices of semantic arguments are structure-shared by the verbs, and ii) a semantic argument sharing is a general requirement of SVCs in Korean. I also argue that an argument composition analysis can accommodate such the new data as the lexical passive SVCs in a simple manner compared to other alternative derivational analyses.

Research paper thumbnail of Multiple Interpretations and Constraints of Causative Serial Verb Constructions in Korean

Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 2012

Research paper thumbnail of The Direct Evidential -te in Korean: Its Interaction with Person and Experiencer Predicates

Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 2012

like to thank Stephen Wechsler for his valuable comments on this paper. The helpful comments of t... more like to thank Stephen Wechsler for his valuable comments on this paper. The helpful comments of the anonymous reviewers and the audiences at the HPSG 2012 Conference are also gratefully acknowledged. Any remaining errors are mine. 1 Abbreviations: Acc = Accusative, Comp = Complementizer, Cop = Copula, Dec = Declarative, Nom = Nominative, Past = Past, Pres = Present, Prog = Progressive, Que = Question, Rel = Relativizer, Te = te, Top = Topicalization.

Research paper thumbnail of Passive Light Verb Construction in Korean: Lexical Representation of toy

Harvard Studies of Korean Linguistics 14, pages 25-45, 2012

Research paper thumbnail of Change of State Verb and Syntax of Serial Verb Constructions in Korean: An HPSG Account

Research paper thumbnail of Two Types of Korean Light Verb Constructions in a Typed Feature Structure Grammar

ACL HLT 2011, Jan 1, 2011

Drafts by Juwon Lee

Research paper thumbnail of Intentionality, Scalar Change, and Non-culmination in Korean Caused Change-of-State Predicates

Non-culmination is an increasingly well studied phenomenon in a variety of languages, whereby a p... more Non-culmination is an increasingly well studied phenomenon in a variety of languages, whereby a predicate that in principle would be classified as a caused change-of-state predicate allows an interpretation in which the final result state named by the predicate does not actually obtain (e.g. for cross-linguistic summaries). A reading such as this is illustrated for Karachay-Balkar (Turkic; spoken in the Caucasus), where the predicate meaning 'open the door' does not entail that the door actually became open:

Research paper thumbnail of Towards a Unified Account of Resultative Constructions in Korean

This paper discusses predicative resultative constructions in Korean and argues that they are act... more This paper discusses predicative resultative constructions in Korean and argues that they are actually a kind of clausal resultative construction (see the two types of resultatives in Wechsler and Noh, 2001). In particular, I propose the following hypotheses: (i) the resultative predicate, X-key, is morpho-syntactically an adverb rather than an adjective, (ii) X-key forms a fully saturated clause (i.e., result clause) (sometimes with the predication subject omitted), and (iii) the result clause is a complement of the main verb in a resultative sentence. Based on these properties, a unified analysis of the resultative constructions is formalized in Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG)

Research paper thumbnail of Intentionality and Conative Constructions in English

Research paper thumbnail of Some Activity Predicates as Accomplishments

Juwon Lee. 2016. Some Activity Predicates as Accomplishments. Language and Information 20.2, 117-... more Juwon Lee. 2016. Some Activity Predicates as Accomplishments. Language and Information 20.2, 117-143. In this paper I argue that some "activity" predicates in Korean are actually a kind of accomplishment rather than activity, unlike English counterparts. As evidence for this recategorization, failed attempt interpretation, ambiguity with in-adverbial or keuy 'almost', and non-ambiguity with tasi 'again' are discussed. This type of accomplishment is called activity-accomplishment here and this accomplishment analysis is extended to other kinds of "activity" verbs in Korean, manner of speaking verbs and perception verbs. I also show that in addition to lexical activity-accomplishment, some derived activity-accomplishments involving resultative or causative constructions support the existence of activity-accomplishment in Korean. (Kyung Hee University)

Research paper thumbnail of An Intention-based Account of Accomplishments in Korean

Research paper thumbnail of Two Types of Serial Verb Constructions in Korean: Subject-Sharing and Index-Sharing

In this paper I present an account for the lexical passive Serial Verb Constructions (SVCs) in Ko... more In this paper I present an account for the lexical passive Serial Verb Constructions (SVCs) in Korean. Regarding the issue of how the arguments of an SVC are realized, I propose two hypotheses: i) Korean SVCs are broadly classified into two types, subject-sharing SVCs where the subject is structure-shared by the verbs and index-sharing SVCs where only indices of semantic arguments are structure-shared by the verbs, and ii) a semantic argument sharing is a general requirement of SVCs in Korean. I also argue that an argument composition analysis can accommodate such the new data as the lexical passive SVCs in a simple manner compared to other alternative derivational analyses.

Research paper thumbnail of Multiple Interpretations and Constraints of Causative Serial Verb Constructions in Korean

Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 2012

Research paper thumbnail of The Direct Evidential -te in Korean: Its Interaction with Person and Experiencer Predicates

Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 2012

like to thank Stephen Wechsler for his valuable comments on this paper. The helpful comments of t... more like to thank Stephen Wechsler for his valuable comments on this paper. The helpful comments of the anonymous reviewers and the audiences at the HPSG 2012 Conference are also gratefully acknowledged. Any remaining errors are mine. 1 Abbreviations: Acc = Accusative, Comp = Complementizer, Cop = Copula, Dec = Declarative, Nom = Nominative, Past = Past, Pres = Present, Prog = Progressive, Que = Question, Rel = Relativizer, Te = te, Top = Topicalization.

Research paper thumbnail of Passive Light Verb Construction in Korean: Lexical Representation of toy

Harvard Studies of Korean Linguistics 14, pages 25-45, 2012

Research paper thumbnail of Change of State Verb and Syntax of Serial Verb Constructions in Korean: An HPSG Account

Research paper thumbnail of Two Types of Korean Light Verb Constructions in a Typed Feature Structure Grammar

ACL HLT 2011, Jan 1, 2011

Research paper thumbnail of Intentionality, Scalar Change, and Non-culmination in Korean Caused Change-of-State Predicates

Non-culmination is an increasingly well studied phenomenon in a variety of languages, whereby a p... more Non-culmination is an increasingly well studied phenomenon in a variety of languages, whereby a predicate that in principle would be classified as a caused change-of-state predicate allows an interpretation in which the final result state named by the predicate does not actually obtain (e.g. for cross-linguistic summaries). A reading such as this is illustrated for Karachay-Balkar (Turkic; spoken in the Caucasus), where the predicate meaning 'open the door' does not entail that the door actually became open:

Research paper thumbnail of Towards a Unified Account of Resultative Constructions in Korean

This paper discusses predicative resultative constructions in Korean and argues that they are act... more This paper discusses predicative resultative constructions in Korean and argues that they are actually a kind of clausal resultative construction (see the two types of resultatives in Wechsler and Noh, 2001). In particular, I propose the following hypotheses: (i) the resultative predicate, X-key, is morpho-syntactically an adverb rather than an adjective, (ii) X-key forms a fully saturated clause (i.e., result clause) (sometimes with the predication subject omitted), and (iii) the result clause is a complement of the main verb in a resultative sentence. Based on these properties, a unified analysis of the resultative constructions is formalized in Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG)

Log In