Byron Glover | Victoria University of Wellington (original) (raw)
Related Authors
: Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced Studies (SAIS), Johns Hopkins University, Washington DC
Uploads
Papers by Byron Glover
An analysis of the the use of Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles (UCAVs) and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle... more An analysis of the the use of Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles (UCAVs) and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), arguing that recent uses of the new technology are untenable on moral, strategic, and legal grounds. Written to 3000 word limit.
An exposition of John Rawls' arguments in his paper "Two Concepts of Rules", and comparative anal... more An exposition of John Rawls' arguments in his paper "Two Concepts of Rules", and comparative analysis against John J.C. Smart's "Extreme and Restricted" Utilitarianism, and H.J. McCloskey's "Restricted Utilitarianism". Written to 3000 word limit.
An opinion piece on the moral justification of humanitarian intervention. Limited reference to ar... more An opinion piece on the moral justification of humanitarian intervention. Limited reference to arguments of Jennifer Sznede and Alex J. Bellamy, but mostly unreferenced. Examines Jus in/Jus ad bello/um with reference to the Kosovo conflict and arrives at a definition of morally defensible humanitarian intervention.
A discussion of the moral justification of terrorism, referring to the theories of David Rodin, N... more A discussion of the moral justification of terrorism, referring to the theories of David Rodin, Noam Chomsky, Saul Similansky, and Michael Neumann. Similansky's Principle of Non-Combatant Immunity is discussed, as well as a definition of terrorism proposed, concluding that terrorism does not constitute a legitimate form of warfare. Written to 2500 word limit.
An analysis of the the use of Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles (UCAVs) and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle... more An analysis of the the use of Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles (UCAVs) and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), arguing that recent uses of the new technology are untenable on moral, strategic, and legal grounds. Written to 3000 word limit.
An exposition of John Rawls' arguments in his paper "Two Concepts of Rules", and comparative anal... more An exposition of John Rawls' arguments in his paper "Two Concepts of Rules", and comparative analysis against John J.C. Smart's "Extreme and Restricted" Utilitarianism, and H.J. McCloskey's "Restricted Utilitarianism". Written to 3000 word limit.
An opinion piece on the moral justification of humanitarian intervention. Limited reference to ar... more An opinion piece on the moral justification of humanitarian intervention. Limited reference to arguments of Jennifer Sznede and Alex J. Bellamy, but mostly unreferenced. Examines Jus in/Jus ad bello/um with reference to the Kosovo conflict and arrives at a definition of morally defensible humanitarian intervention.
A discussion of the moral justification of terrorism, referring to the theories of David Rodin, N... more A discussion of the moral justification of terrorism, referring to the theories of David Rodin, Noam Chomsky, Saul Similansky, and Michael Neumann. Similansky's Principle of Non-Combatant Immunity is discussed, as well as a definition of terrorism proposed, concluding that terrorism does not constitute a legitimate form of warfare. Written to 2500 word limit.