Philippa Carr | University of the West of England (original) (raw)
Uploads
Papers by Philippa Carr
The Psychologist, 2022
Against the backdrop of Brexit, a pandemic, war in Ukraine, a cost-of-living crisis, and the UK G... more Against the backdrop of Brexit, a pandemic, war in Ukraine, a cost-of-living crisis, and the UK Government’s 2019 manifesto promise to ‘level-up’, income inequality should be at the forefront of psychological research…
Discourse & Society, 2021
Critical Discourse Studies, 2018
The increasing recognition of the negative impact of income inequality has highlighted the import... more The increasing recognition of the negative impact of income inequality has highlighted the importance of taxation which can function as a redistributive mechanism. Previous critical social psychological research found that talk about restricting the welfare state, that is funded through tax, is formed of ideology that supports the maintenance of income inequality. Therefore, this research explores how speakers use talk about tax to justify income inequality during a UK BBC radio discussion, 'Moral Maze: The moral purpose of tax' which involved public figures discussing the role of tax. This programme was analysed from a critical discursive psychological perspective. It was found that two contrasting constructions of tax were presented: tax as a collective responsibility or tax as an individual burden, whereby speakers drew on social justice and individualistic ideology respectively. Arguments for high tax rates are problematic due to the acceptability of inequality in a meritocracy. By presenting wealthy individuals as more deserving than the less affluent, arguments for higher tax come to be challenged.
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Book chapters by Philippa Carr
Political Communication , 2020
Book Reviews by Philippa Carr
BPS Political Psychology Bulletin, 2020
European Journal of Communication
Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2021
Conference reviews by Philippa Carr
Social Psychological Review, 2018
Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy... more Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.
The Psychologist, 2022
Against the backdrop of Brexit, a pandemic, war in Ukraine, a cost-of-living crisis, and the UK G... more Against the backdrop of Brexit, a pandemic, war in Ukraine, a cost-of-living crisis, and the UK Government’s 2019 manifesto promise to ‘level-up’, income inequality should be at the forefront of psychological research…
Discourse & Society, 2021
Critical Discourse Studies, 2018
The increasing recognition of the negative impact of income inequality has highlighted the import... more The increasing recognition of the negative impact of income inequality has highlighted the importance of taxation which can function as a redistributive mechanism. Previous critical social psychological research found that talk about restricting the welfare state, that is funded through tax, is formed of ideology that supports the maintenance of income inequality. Therefore, this research explores how speakers use talk about tax to justify income inequality during a UK BBC radio discussion, 'Moral Maze: The moral purpose of tax' which involved public figures discussing the role of tax. This programme was analysed from a critical discursive psychological perspective. It was found that two contrasting constructions of tax were presented: tax as a collective responsibility or tax as an individual burden, whereby speakers drew on social justice and individualistic ideology respectively. Arguments for high tax rates are problematic due to the acceptability of inequality in a meritocracy. By presenting wealthy individuals as more deserving than the less affluent, arguments for higher tax come to be challenged.
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Political Communication , 2020
BPS Political Psychology Bulletin, 2020
European Journal of Communication
Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2021
Social Psychological Review, 2018
Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy... more Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.