Editorial: In Honour of Jack C. Richard’s Six-decade Contribution to Language Teaching (original) (raw)
Related papers
A review of "Language and Learning: An Introduction for Teaching" 4th ed. by Marie Emmitt, Linda Komesaroff and John Pollock published by Oxford University Press 2006. ISBN 9 78019555 125This book provides a foundation for understanding language in the classroom. It clearly appeals to a well-defined audience of language educators who are practising teachers of English or of another language, in any context, or involved in pre-service teacher education. The best aspects of this book are its presentation, since it is written in a clear and accessible way that makes it particularly suited to students enrolled in Education courses, perhaps at a postgraduate level, such as a Graduate Certificate. The acquisition of some notions of linguistics would undoubtedly be helpful to teachers who may have lacked grounding in language structures in their training.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2013
As Rod Ellis states in his Preface, Craig Chaudron's book, Second Language Classroom: Research on Teaching and Learning, published in 1988, reviewed systematically the L2 classroom research up to that time. Although Chaudron updated the research community on the development of classroom research in 2001 with an article published in The Modern Language Journal, the space given to it and the relatively brief nature of the review make it necessary that a new volume presenting a comprehensive survey and critical appraisal of the research into L2 learning and teaching in classrooms be available. Ellis' new book, Language Teaching Research and Language Pedagogy (LTRALP), serves this purpose perfectly well. Anyway, it has been over 20 years since the publication of Chaudron's 1988 book, and the rapid development of the field warrants the publication of such a comprehensive book. LTRALP includes 11 main chapters in addition to a concise Preface, where Ellis explains his own theorising of language teaching. He presents two views, one is what he refers to as the 'external view' and the other as the 'internal view'. The former regards language teaching in terms of methods, approaches, materials and techniques, and the latter in terms of it being a 'process'. He posits that such a distinction is important and that the studies he has reviewed in the book can be categorised according to this typology. It is also in his Preface that Ellis highlights the two principal research paradigms: the normative paradigm, which tends to test hypotheses and the interpretive paradigm, which 'seeks to describe and understand some aspect of teaching by identifying key variables and examining how they interrelate' (p. x). Chapter 1, 'Introduction: Developments in Language Teaching Research', as the title indicates, gives the reader a panoramic view of all the topics to be considered in the book. What needs to be stressed is that Ellis has successfully defined what language teaching research is and stated his rationale for electing to focus on it in his book. Ellis begins Chapter 2, 'Methods for Researching the Second Language Classroom', with a discussion of formal and practitioner research before examining the main research traditions in relation to their theoretical underpinnings, research design, data collection and processing methods. The focus of Chapter 3, 'Comparative Method Studies', presents studies that compare different teaching methods. Historically, such studies were once popular, as the ambition of doing so was to find the best methods for effectively teaching foreign language skills. Evidently, such studies have lost their popularity and attracted much criticism because of their insensitivity to the fact that different contexts require different methods and the search for the 'best method' has proven to be futile (Kumaravadivelu, 2006). Chapter 4, 'Second Language Classroom Discourse', examines the oral discourse in L2 classrooms and its nature in the lesson process. Ellis argues that "'teaching' is discourse. observation of the discourse that arises in actual classrooms is fundamental to developing an understanding of language teaching and its relationship to learning" (p. 75). Accordingly, discourse processes become the focus of this chapter. Descriptive research discussed in this chapter range from interaction analysis to classroom discourse analysis, types of language use, conversation analysis and the L2 classroom, and scaffolding in sociocultural theory. Chapters 5 and 6 place their foci on the teacher and the learner respectively. As can be easily imagined, the teacher is the main person that contributes to classroom discourse in most cases. Therefore, studies of teacher talk are the mainstay of a chapter with the teacher as the central figure. Various research studies on teacher talk (including teacher talk and L2 acquisition, teacher talk and teacher education) and teacher questions (including teacher questioning strategies and socially-oriented studies of teacher questions) are reviewed. There have been debates about the role of the learner's L1 in the L2 classroom, and such debates are also discussed in Chapter 5 in relation to various studies on the use of the L1 in L2 classrooms and on teachers' beliefs about the use of the L1. The use of metalanguage and related research into teachers' use of metalanguage, studies on corrective feedback, and teacher cognitions about language teaching are also reviewed. Given the centrality of the learner in the classroom in the field of language teaching and learning, Ellis rightly points out the relative scarcity of research into the learner's contribution to classroom discourse. Quoting Ortega and Iberri-Shea (2005, p. 27), who point out that 'Many questions concerning second language learning are fundamentally
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2013
As Rod Ellis states in his Preface, Craig Chaudron's book, Second Language Classroom: Research on Teaching and Learning, published in 1988, reviewed systematically the L2 classroom research up to that time. Although Chaudron updated the research community on the development of classroom research in 2001 with an article published in The Modern Language Journal, the space given to it and the relatively brief nature of the review make it necessary that a new volume presenting a comprehensive survey and critical appraisal of the research into L2 learning and teaching in classrooms be available. Ellis' new book, Language Teaching Research and Language Pedagogy (LTRALP), serves this purpose perfectly well. Anyway, it has been over 20 years since the publication of Chaudron's 1988 book, and the rapid development of the field warrants the publication of such a comprehensive book. LTRALP includes 11 main chapters in addition to a concise Preface, where Ellis explains his own theorising of language teaching. He presents two views, one is what he refers to as the 'external view' and the other as the 'internal view'. The former regards language teaching in terms of methods, approaches, materials and techniques, and the latter in terms of it being a 'process'. He posits that such a distinction is important and that the studies he has reviewed in the book can be categorised according to this typology. It is also in his Preface that Ellis highlights the two principal research paradigms: the normative paradigm, which tends to test hypotheses and the interpretive paradigm, which 'seeks to describe and understand some aspect of teaching by identifying key variables and examining how they interrelate' (p. x). Chapter 1, 'Introduction: Developments in Language Teaching Research', as the title indicates, gives the reader a panoramic view of all the topics to be considered in the book. What needs to be stressed is that Ellis has successfully defined what language teaching research is and stated his rationale for electing to focus on it in his book. Ellis begins Chapter 2, 'Methods for Researching the Second Language Classroom', with a discussion of formal and practitioner research before examining the main research traditions in relation to their theoretical underpinnings, research design, data collection and processing methods. The focus of Chapter 3, 'Comparative Method Studies', presents studies that compare different teaching methods. Historically, such studies were once popular, as the ambition of doing so was to find the best methods for effectively teaching foreign language skills. Evidently, such studies have lost their popularity and attracted much criticism because of their insensitivity to the fact that different contexts require different methods and the search for the 'best method' has proven to be futile (Kumaravadivelu, 2006). Chapter 4, 'Second Language Classroom Discourse', examines the oral discourse in L2 classrooms and its nature in the lesson process. Ellis argues that "'teaching' is discourse. observation of the discourse that arises in actual classrooms is fundamental to developing an understanding of language teaching and its relationship to learning" (p. 75). Accordingly, discourse processes become the focus of this chapter. Descriptive research discussed in this chapter range from interaction analysis to classroom discourse analysis, types of language use, conversation analysis and the L2 classroom, and scaffolding in sociocultural theory. Chapters 5 and 6 place their foci on the teacher and the learner respectively. As can be easily imagined, the teacher is the main person that contributes to classroom discourse in most cases. Therefore, studies of teacher talk are the mainstay of a chapter with the teacher as the central figure. Various research studies on teacher talk (including teacher talk and L2 acquisition, teacher talk and teacher education) and teacher questions (including teacher questioning strategies and socially-oriented studies of teacher questions) are reviewed. There have been debates about the role of the learner's L1 in the L2 classroom, and such debates are also discussed in Chapter 5 in relation to various studies on the use of the L1 in L2 classrooms and on teachers' beliefs about the use of the L1. The use of metalanguage and related research into teachers' use of metalanguage, studies on corrective feedback, and teacher cognitions about language teaching are also reviewed. Given the centrality of the learner in the classroom in the field of language teaching and learning, Ellis rightly points out the relative scarcity of research into the learner's contribution to classroom discourse. Quoting Ortega and Iberri-Shea (2005, p. 27), who point out that 'Many questions concerning second language learning are fundamentally
Journal of Language Teaching and Research
academypublisher.com
Journal of Language Teaching and Research ISSN 1798-4769 Volume 2, Number 4, July 2011 Contents REGULAR PAPERS Piaget's Egocentrism and Language Learning: Language Egocentrism (LE) and Language Differentiation (LD) JeongChul Heo, Sumi Han, Christopher Koch, ...
2006
This book provides a foundation for understanding language in the classroom. It clearly appeals to a well-defined audience of language educators who are practising teachers of English or of another language, in any context, or involved in pre-service teacher education. It claims to "support teachers in expanding their knowledge about language and the implications for teaching" (p. x), and to oblige them to reflect upon and evaluate their practices. The authors are very explicit about enhancing their targeted readers' "understanding of the nature and function of language and language learning in order to assist [their] decision-making in the classroom", but, as they are quick to remark, "[t]his is not a 'how to' book" (p. xi). The theoretical background informing this 4 th edition (the first edition appeared in 1991) builds on the socio-cultural constructivist view of language learning, with an emphasis on critical pedagogies, particularly apt, as we are told, to "empower" students through literacy education. The authors state quite openly that they have distilled concepts and insights from different theoretical perspectives with a view to enable individual teachers to construct their own theory. In this way, sounder theoretical knowledge should assist teachers in their practice, and strengthen their ability to explain a program to the wider community of colleagues, students and their parents. Developing an enhanced understanding of learning and appreciation of language is unarguably very valuable for teachers who, in this way, should be better equipped to manage the many contemporary and controversial issues that confront them as they carry out their professional activities. However, at times, this reviewer felt that the dilution of established linguistics theories leads to some concepts being juxtaposed without any clear articulation of their connection, and unfortunately there does not appear to be, either in the text or as an entry in the glossary or index, any discussion of the nature of constructivism, about which teachers are bound to enquire. The content is divided into three main sections: Language and Culture (Part 1), Linguistics and Language Structure (Part 2) and Language and Learning (Part 3). Each chapter within the three sections includes pre-reading activities and several suggestions for further activities and discussion. These can all be workshopped in class. Sections at the end of each chapter include a summary of the chapter and
A Brief History of Language Teaching
The purpose of this article is to give some context to the current discussions abounding in language teaching classrooms around the world. I think it is essential to judge the most recently marketed approaches in the light of what has gone before. And following Thomas Kuhn, who wrote the seminal The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, my suggestion is that we integrate and account for, rather than sweep away, past approaches.
Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods (MJLTM)
2018
In this article I explore some of the arguments pertaining to word-structure used by the nativists to bolster the idea that language is part of our genetic endowment. The focal point of this analysis will centre primarily on the arguments put forth by Steven Pinker in his various works, regarding the morphological constraints supposedly imposed on language by our genetically hard-wired language faculty. Peter Gordon’s work on English compounding will also be critically evaluated. I contend that these allegedly innate constraints are wrongly construed as such, and can easily be explained without postulating a ‘language acquisition device’, as contingent cultural and environmental factors suffice when trying to explain the morphological phenomena Pinker believes can only be explained by the innate constraints of universal grammar. Hence, this strand of the nativist’s paradigm needs to be seriously re-evaluated as the original conclusions drawn by theorists like Pinker and Gordon are f...