Editorial: The renewed ‘crisis’: Housing struggle before and after the pandemic (original) (raw)
Related papers
Housing Crisis and Social Mobilization in times of COVID19
Partecipazione e Conflitto, 2023
Three years into the pandemic, this special issue explores, analyses and conceptualizes the link between social mobilization and housing crisis management in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, aiming to understand more systematically the changes in strategies and organization undergone by mobilized groups to develop new and more effective forms of resistance to the broadening and deepening of housing crises and social polarizations. More broadly, this issue questions the evolution of power relations – including those among institutional and conflictual actors – in this context. This means, above all, critically analysing successes and failures of activism and movements in the production of new proposals and discourses, and comparing them in time and space
Radical Housing Journal, 2020
Seemingly overnight, the use value of housing as a life-nurturing, safe place is at the center of political discourse, policy-making, and new governmentalities. The right to suitable and secure shelter has shifted from the “radical” margins to the object of unprecedented public policy interventions worldwide. Writing collectively from the relative privilege of our (often precarious) homes, we sketch out a space to reflect on the centrality of housing and home to the Covid-19 crisis, to disentangle the key nexus between housing, the aftermath of the 2008 crisis, austerity, and the current pandemic, and connect current responses to longer-term trajectories of dispossession and disposability, bordering, ethno-nationalism, financialization, imperialism, capitalism, patriarchy, and racism. We argue that much is to be learned from collective organizing and mutual aid in the context of previous moments of disaster capitalism.
Housing and the Pandemic: How Has Covid-19 Influenced Residents’ Needs and Aspirations?
Real Estate Management and Valuation
Satisfactory housing conditions define, in many aspects, people’s comfort and a high standard of living. The psychological and social characteristics of residents strongly determine housing needs and preferences. They also depend on economic, spatial, technical, and cultural factors. The Covid-19 pandemic, which humankind had been experiencing for two years, influenced all spheres of human life, especially inhabitation. The functional program of homes has changed, as well as public spaces, transportation and social ties. While the future is uncertain, the many changes provoked by the pandemic might become irreversible. This paper aims to present how the phenomena mentioned above have influenced the housing environment and residential preferences and trends that may follow. A survey conducted among Cracow residents in Autumn 2021 revealed a significant shift in lifestyles that corresponded with the change in residential needs, preferences and attitudes towards the housing environment...
Housing Approaches After The Global Crisis: The Pandemic and The House of The Future
SPAD'2020 International Spatial Planning and Design Symposium, November, 27-29, İzmir, Proceedings Book, pp. 105-119, 2020
Throughout history, the idea of creating an ideal space for an ideal society always has been existed. As a way of creating ideal space, utopias described the spatial productions as a result of the future expectations. On the other hand, urban utopias have tried to find solutions to the social crises and it was developed on the basis of the idea of establishing a future-oriented life model. At this point, the concept of housing has been the focus of these approaches in both theory and practice. Today, there is a new global crisis that changes the way of using space and predicts a different future by affecting daily life. Therefore, the new design approaches about housing during pandemic and the idea of house of the future became a new matter of curiosity for researchers. In this study, the focus is on housing approaches eveloped as a result of today's conditions. In this context, it is aimed to find an answer to the question of whether the proposed new life models for housing in the current crisis environment can be considered as examples of contemporary utopia and to discuss the intellectual exercises presented in this period.
Editorial: Valuing housing in the normalised crises: Resistance, fatigue and lexicons of struggle
Radical Housing Journal, 2021
In the continuum of intersecting housing crises, the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic are still testing individual and collective capacities to survive displacement, surveillance, precarisation and policing. Issue 3.2 emerges in the context of normalised new and old crises; both from and within the fatigue and normalisation of current ‘exceptional conditions’ and their implications for housing activists and engaged academics, and from the search for places and languages of resistance as sites for transformation.
Can't #StayAtHome without a home: politics of housing precarity in Greece in the time of pandemic
C. Petropoulou, J. Holloway, F. Matamoros Ponce, E. González Cruz, P. Doulos, M. A. Melgarejo Pérez, D. Tzanetatos, K. Zafeiris, C. Tsavdaroglou (coord.). Luchas invisibles en tiempos de pandemia, Vol.II. Mytilene-Puebla: University of the Aegean, Greece ; Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Mexico, 2022
This chapter discusses the politics of housing precarity in the time of pandemic. In Greece, the biopolitical response to the pandemic has been taking place in a context of ongoing austerity, whereby essential public services have been degraded and housing precarity, previously reserved for those at the margins, is invading the lives of the homeowning majority. Adhering to a mode of governance through precarization, government policy has renounced the task of reinforcing social structures of support and is limited to redistributing vulnerability by shifting risk from the present to the future and creating further subdivisions among the precarious through new discourses of worthiness and blame. While governmental #StayAtHome campaigns reassert the home as the centerpiece of the biopolitical response to the health crisis, new mechanisms for the commercialization and financialization of housing are being introduced by recently adopted insolvency legislation. The discourse of individual responsibility in fending off contagion thus clashes against the conditions of unaffordability, exclusion and precarity in the housing sector. In this context of generalized insecurity, housing mobilizations have been emerging mainly around precarized homeownership, rent and work precarity, and migrant solidarity. Despite diverging interpretations of the housing challenges and a diversity of demands, housing movements are enacting new forms of political agency that take insecurity as the starting point for inclusive struggles around solidarity and mutual care.