Strengthening the International Clinical Scholarly Community: Opportunities for the Clinical Law Review and Beyond (original) (raw)
Related papers
The evolution of the field of legal medicine: A holistic investigation of global outputs with bibliometric analysis, 2019
The purpose of this study is to make a holistic summary of the articles published in the field of Legal Medicine/ Forensic Science through bibliometric methods, determine the top cited publications in the field, and to determine the most active journals and especially trend topics. The articles published in the field of Legal Medicine between the years 1975 and 2018 were downloaded from the Web of Science index and were analyzed using bibliometric methods. The correlations between the number of publications of the countries and the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), and the Gross Domestic Product per capita (GDP PPP) values was analyzed using the Spearman’s correlation coefficient. The number of articles to be published in the field of Legal Medicine between the years 2019 and 2022 was estimated with linear regression analysis. The results showed that there were totally 38845 articles published in the field of Legal Medicine. Regression analysis results indicate that it will exceed 2500 publications after 2022. The most productive countries in the field of Legal Medicine were the USA (12.448, 32.045%). A high correlation was found between legal medicine publication productivity and GDP and GDP PPP (r ¼ 0.726, p < 0.001; r ¼ 0.703, p < 0.001). As for the collaboration between countries, analysis results showed that the network web indicated the most important factor as the geographical location. This study will provide important information to a forensic scientist (a doctor, academic, and practitioner).
Why not an International Journal of Clinical Legal Education?
International Journal of Clinical Legal Education, 2014
Jerome Frank may have suggested the term Clinical Legal Education (CLE) first when he asked “Why Not a Clinical Lawyer School?”2; but, it was not until the New York City based Council on Legal Education for Professional Responsibility (CLEPR), funded by the Ford Foundation, took the pre-eminently active role in promoting and supporting law school-based experimentation in the 1970s and 1980s that CLE truly had an opportunity to develop. Over the past thirty plus years CLE has become more and more central to legal education, especially in the United States; innovations elsewhere have been fewer, more modest, and slower to develop, but of significance to the shifting culture of law learning, wherever they have taken place. The inception of the Journal3 marks an important milestone in the continuing development of CLE; for with this volume, we formally recognise that CLE is a vitally important and diverse phenomenon with a global reach.
Advancing a Broader View of Clinical Scholarship
2019
Tony Amsterdam’s view of clinical teaching as expressed in his essay in the inaugural issue of the Clinical Law Review (CLR) remains as relevant today as when the journal was conceived. His observation on the importance of discerning the particular as offering insights on the general is helpful to appreciating the value of clinical scholarship. My take on the essence of Tony Amsterdam’s piece was that in time we would learn what clinical scholarship was and that whatever it was going to be would come out of the unique experience of the clinical teacher. Unlike the so-called “podium” teacher, the clinical teacher is enmeshed in the complicated world of law driven mostly by facts, clients, students, witnesses, judges, and countless other actors.2 With a quarter century’s passage since the CLR’s founding, it is fitting that we take stock of how far we have come and the challenges that lie ahead. Before the CLR’s first issue in 1994, few law reviews recognized clinical scholarship, let ...
International Journal of Legal Medicine
From its launc h in 1922 to the end of the Second World War, the Deutsche Zeitschrift für die gesamte gerichtliche Medizin spanned 38 volumes. The 1762 papers contained in those volumes reflect contemporary interests and include many papers from peripheral fields and non-medico-legal disciplines. Publications concerned with issues outside core legal medicine fields in particular allow two distinct tendencies in the development of German institutes of legal medicine to be discerned. Firstly, there is a focus on the psychological and psychiatric aspects of the discipline. Secondly, there is tendency towards a scientific-criminalistic outlook. The fatal consequences of the Nazi seizure of power in 1933 did not spare the sciences. For legal medicine, a discipline with close links to the state, it is unsurprising that fundamental changes to the political system had a significant impact on subject matter. Leaving aside articles notable principally for their ideological content, our analys...
2018
As legal educators, we can benefit in taking stock from time to time of whence we came, how far we have traveled, and where we are going. Richard Wilson’s book about the evolution of clinical legal education does just that. He has spent the better part of his career as a clinical law teacher and international human rights lawyer working on this subject. As much of his scholarship and work have focused on collaborations with and support of law clinics in other parts of the world, he brings a breadth of knowledge to this study of clinical legal education.1 One of the great challenges of any book that styles itself as “global” is that it will either overgeneralize or overcomplicate the subject matter. That risk becomes even more substantial when the subject being compared is the reach of clinical education across legal systems. This book approaches the challenge with great care, and, in my view, strikes a nice balance between overand under-simplification. Because it covers virtually al...
Legal Journals: In Pursuit of a More Scientific Approach
European Journal of Legal Education, 2005
In 1942, the American sociologist of science, Robert Merton, suggested as one of the norms of academic science that universities ought to be places of 'organised scepticism'. Academic law journals should contribute to this mission, since the quality of an academic discipline largely depends on the quality of its publication culture. Informed by the American experiences including the dominant law reviews, and by contrast an international medical journal, this article tries to obtain a better view of the publication culture involving legal scholarship and the possibilities of improving it. The American format of the law review is generally very distant from the form of publication used in most other disciplines and from legal publications in many other parts of the world. One of the major problems of the legal discipline is that non-Americans generally do not publish in American law reviews vice versa. As a consequence, a proper, worldwide academic exchange of ideas is hindered. With the exception of a few journals, the world remains divided. This inhibits progress in legal scholarship. If a 'world format' for a legal article is to be adopted, the European model seems more appropriate than the American one.
The Responsibility of the Institutional Review Board in Good Clinical Practice: First, Do No Harm
Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences, 2015
I read with interest the article on outpatient management of burn wounds published in a recent issue of the IJMS. 1 There are many questions that arise which are worth mentioning. Under the methodology section, no description was provided on how patients were randomized into the two treatment arms and, therefore, it is not possible to assess how confounding variables were controlled. Based on the data presented in table 3 of the article, the pain score before dressing was significantly lower in the "amnion group" than the "control group". This might reflect degrees of bias in assigning patients to the study groups. Consequently, as expected, the pain score measured after dressing and the dose of analgesics consumed were lower in the "amnion group" than in the "control group" (table 3 of the article).
Features of scholarly practice in health care professionals: A scoping review protocol
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy, 2020
Introduction: Health care professionals are expected to embrace and enact the scholarly practitioner role. Scholarly practitioners demonstrate a lifelong commitment to excellence in practice through continuous learning, engagement in evidence-informed decision-making, contributions to scholarship, and knowledge translation. However, the specific features and requirements associated with this role are not uniform. The absence of well-defined and delineated conceptualizations of scholarly practice and the scarcity of empirical research on how scholarly practice is operationalized contribute to a lack of a shared understanding of this complex role. Aim: The purpose of this scoping review is to map the breadth and depth of the literature on what is known about scholarly practice in licensed health care professionals. Methods: Arksey and O'Malley's 6-stage scoping review framework will be used to examine the breadth and depth of the literature on the definitions and conceptualizations of the scholar role in health care professionals. We will conduct a comprehensive search from inception to present in MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), and CINAHL using scholarly practitioner terms and related synonyms, including a grey literature search. Following a calibration exercise, two independent reviewers will screen retrieved papers for inclusion and extract relevant data. Included papers will: (i) explore, describe, or define scholarly practice, scholar or scholarly practitioner, and/or related concepts in the licensed health care professionals; (ii) be conceptual and/or theoretical in nature; (iii) use quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methodologies; and (iv) be published in English or French. Numeric and thematic analysis will characterize the data and address the research objectives.