What Shapes Environmental Responsibility Perceptions? Measuring Value Orientations as a Predictor of Situational Motivations and Communicative Action (original) (raw)
Related papers
Sustainability, 2022
Climate change has become a life-threatening problem. Guided by the Situational Theory of Problem Solving (STOPS), the main goal of this experimental study is to understand the relationship between issue salience, issue proximity, communicative behavior for environmental issues, situation motivation for climate change, and environmental CSR (ECSR) supportive outcomes. This study used a U.S. sample (N = 440) recruited from a Qualtrics online panel and conducted a 2 (issue salience: salient vs. non-salient) × 2 (issue proximity: local vs. global) experimental design to examine the role of issue salience and issue proximity on individuals’ environmentally friendly CSR outcomes. The structural equation model indicated that issue proximity has no significant impact, but issue salience impacted communicative behavior for environmental issues, which then predicted ECSR-supportive behavioral intentions. Importantly, most STOPS research has employed situational motivation as a mediator, but ...
Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 2020
Purpose-While the segmentation approach has been frequently employed to explore individuals' environment-friendly behaviors, the investigation of environmental corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication by using such a method is limited. Given that the importance of the role of public segmentation is well documented in both public relations and environmental management literatures, the present study attempts to fill the gap by exploring whether consumers can be segmented on the basis of attitudinal factors, and, if so, how this segmentation informs communication efforts aimed at promoting companies' environmental CSR programs. Design/methodology/approach-This segmentation approach is examined based on a survey of 470 participants. Results of a k-means cluster analysis identified three subgroups: active publics, aware publics and latent publics. Findings-Survey results provide empirical support evidence on how different public segmentation approaches can be used to predict individual communication behaviors on environmental CSR issues. Segmentation approach that considered individuals' attitudes on environmental issues and their perceptions on company environmental CSR practices helps identify three subgroups. Significant differences regarding communicative action and supporting behaviors among the three groups are identified and discussed. Originality/value-This study provides key insights about public segmentation and different publics' communicative action, and supportive behaviors provide direction for future research investigations that will strengthen theoretical arguments and best practices in public relations.
Sustainability
Individuals take cues from their surroundings when deciding whether to perform pro-environmental behaviors. Previous studies have acknowledged the role of structural, policy, and communication efforts to encourage pro-environmental behavior. Such studies demonstrate the importance of evaluating the external contexts when examining behaviors. Yet, there is a lack of explication of what external context is entailed. Expanding the concept of perceived sustainability-related climate (PSRC) used in organizational communication literature, this study proposes two dimensions that shape PSRC in the workplace—structural cues and social cues. The study then generalizes PSRC such that it is applicable in contexts beyond the workplace and proposes a 10-item scale to measure PSRC. Using confirmatory factor analysis, this study tests the factor structure and concurrent validity of the concept. The study also tests convergent validity of PSRC with social norms, perceived behavioral control, and at...
The relationships between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientations
Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2008
Different people become engaged in environmental issues and perform proenvironmental behavior because they believe in and are concerned about adverse consequences of environmental problems for themselves (egoistic beliefs and concerns), others (socialaltruistic beliefs and concerns), or the biosphere (biospheric beliefs and concerns). These different beliefs and concerns are assumed to derive from corresponding value orientations. Yet, distinguishing egoistic, social-altruistic, and biospheric value orientations has proved difficult in previous research. Based on a survey of 494 Swedish residents between 18 and 69 years old, the present study provides empirical support for that egoistic, social-altruistic, and biospheric environmental concerns are related to corresponding awareness-ofconsequences beliefs, and that both the beliefs and environmental concerns are related to the three value types power, benevolence, and universalism. r
Corporate Social Responsibility in Korea: How to Communicate Global Issues to Local Stakeholders
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
This paper examines how to get support and legitimation for global environmental CSR campaigns from local and domestic stakeholders using construal level theory. The paper develops communication strategies to enhance the persuasiveness of CSR campaigns. A survey was with 252 young adults in eight experimental groups. We argue that there exists a certain distance toward every CSR topic perceived by individuals and that each matches better with either desirability or feasibility message framing. The results show that desirability messages have a greater power of persuasion in a CSR campaign that yields consequences in a distant time and place, whereas feasibility messages have a greater persuasive power in a campaign that yields relatively immediate results in a nearby place. We propose some recommendations for businesses on how to apply the findings to a practical CSR message design in order to improve the persuasiveness of global CSR campaigns. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Lt...
Problem Solving and Communicative Action: A Situational Theory of Problem Solving
Journal of Communication, 2011
This article introduces the situational theory of problem solving (theory of problem solving) as an extended and generalized version of the situational theory of publics (theory of publics). The theory of problem solving introduces a new concept, communicative action in problem solving, as its dependent variable. To explain communicative action, the theory of problem solving refines the independent variables of the theory of publics: problem recognition, constraint recognition, involvement recognition, and referent criterion. Finally, it introduces a new variable: situational motivation in problem solving. The new motivational variable mediates the effects of antecedent perceptual variables on communicative behavior. We report the supporting evidence for theoretical propositions of the new theory based on structural equation modeling (SEM) testing using survey data.
2017
While studies indicate there is a strong link between pro-environmental values and behaviour, they also show that such values are not necessarily enacted consistently across all areas of our lives. There are many psychosocial factors that can affect congruent enactment. Improving our understanding of what these factors are and how they influence cognition and behaviour is critical for subverting our inadequate response to ecological crisis, yet it is an area that remains under explored. In this thesis I investigate factors affecting enactment of pro-environmental values by individuals in organisational contexts. Integrating Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis with frame and metaphor analysis in an innovative transdisciplinary and cross-level methodology, my study enquires into the lived, embodied and situated experience of six sustainability managers and leaders in the UK and Canada in their work to influence pro-environmental practices in their organisations. Using semi- struc...
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 2001
This study investigates the influence of value orientations measured at the individual level (individualism, collectivism, and locus of control) and of economic status on environmental beliefs and behavior. Structural equation modeling reveals that the preferred model is one in which the value orientations and economic status influence beliefs about recycling, which in turn influence recycling behavior, but the influence of the value orientations and economic status differs as a function of the type of environmental belief. Individualism and economic status are related to beliefs about the inconvenience of recycling; collectivism and locus of control are related to beliefs about the importance of recycling. Moreover, specific beliefs about the importance of recycling have both a direct influence on recycling behavior and an effect that is mediated by beliefs about the inconvenience of recycling. The authors present the implications of the study for public policy and marketing commun...
Psychosocial factors influencing pro-environmental decision-making in organisations
Whilst awareness of the importance and urgency of acting to mitigate anthropogenic environmental change is generally high, adaptive responses have matched neither the scale nor the complex nature of the challenge. Inertia at individual and organisational levels is a troubling conundrum. In this paper, we analyse the psychosocial factors at work for individuals attempting to influence their organisations' pro-environmental actions. Our study focuses on six individuals with pro-environmental values who have formal roles in their organisation with regard to environmental policy, strategy and practice. This in-depth qualitative study enquires into the experience of research participants as they act to influence their organisations in this regard. Our analysis draws from, and develops, understanding of psychological threat coping strategies, basic psychological needs and cognitive frames in relation to pro-environmental behaviour. We identify and model key dynamics and interactions in psychosocial forces and reveal tensions that impact individuals' motivation, resilience and effectiveness in influencing pro-environmental decisions. In particular, our analysis highlights tensions in competency, autonomy and relatedness need satisfaction; and in coping strategies such as suppressing 'deep green' identity, suppressing negative emotion about the ecological situation, and in going into natural places to gain restorative benefit and renew motivation. These findings contribute important insight to our understanding of human cognition, motivation and behaviour in relation to (mal)adaptive responses such as inertia to ecological crisis. Our results also offer the potential for practical implications: bringing these dynamics to conscious awareness has the potential to enable the identification of points of intervention and, ultimately, the ability to enhance rather than undermine authentic and effective action.
Using Motivational Interviewing to reduce threats in conversations about environmental behavior
Frontiers in Psychology, 2015
Human behavior contributes to a waste of environmental resources and our society is looking for ways to reduce this problem. However, humans may perceive feedback about their environmental behavior as threatening. According to self-determination theory (SDT), threats decrease intrinsic motivation for behavior change. According to self-affirmation theory (SAT), threats can harm individuals' self-integrity. Therefore, individuals should show self-defensive biases, e.g., in terms of presenting counterarguments when presented with environmental behavior change. The current study examines how change recipients respond to threats from change agents in interactions about environmental behavior change. Moreover, we investigate how Motivational Interviewing (MI) -an intervention aimed at increasing intrinsic motivation -can reduce threats at both the social and cognitive level. We videotaped 68 dyadic interactions with change agents who either did or did not use MI (control group). We coded agents verbal threats and recipients' verbal expressions of motivation. Recipients also rated agents' level of confrontation and empathy (i.e., cognitive reactions). As hypothesized, threats were significantly lower when change agents used MI. Perceived confrontations converged with observable social behavior of change agents in both groups. Moreover, behavioral threats showed a negative association with change recipients' expressed motivation (i.e., reasons to change). Contrary to our expectations, we found no relation between change agents' verbal threats and change recipients' verbally expressed selfdefenses (i.e., sustain talk). Our results imply that MI reduces the adverse impact of threats in conversations about environmental behavior change on both the social and cognitive level. We discuss theoretical implications of our study in the context of SAT and SDT and suggest practical implications for environmental change agents in organizations.