Foundering on diversity and strangeness. Didactic problems in religious education (original) (raw)
Related papers
RIVAL CONCEPTIONS OF RELIGIOUS EDUCATION
International Handbook of Philosophy of Education (ed.) Paul Smeyers (Dordrecht: Springer, 2018) ‘RELIGIOUS EDUCATION’
The sense of religious education under discussion in this chapter will be the formative influence of children, with respect to religions. Such influence could be anti-religious, pro-religious, or neutral about the value of religion. What I will call ‘the Basic Question’ asks ‘how ought children to be influenced with respect to religions?’ In this chapter we will assess a range of forms that question can take in different kinds of societies. We will distinguish and explore questions regarding the moral permissibility and desirability, and the legal permissibility, of various answers to the Basic Question. First however, we will consider some rival answers and approaches to the question of what counts as a religion.
Religion Education and ‘weak’ Religious Education: Common Concerns
Religionspädagogische Beiträge
As a response to the increasing plurality of the student population, there have been several shifts in religious education over the past decades. After a brief sketch of these shifts, particular attention will be given to ‘weak’ religious education and to religion education. In order to do so, attention is amongst others given to the principle of neutrality and to several critiques on this concept. Subsequently, we will focus on several common concerns in religion education as well as in weak religious education: the need for religious literacy, the importance of (interreligious) dialogue, identity formation, and socialization. In order to comply with these concerns in different school types and in religion education as well as in (weak) religious education classes, the development of a common curriculum for religion and worldviews could be an interesting option. We will have a closer look at such a curriculum, which is at present in an advanced stage in the Netherlands, and which ...
Religious Education: Definitions, Dilemmas, Challenges, and Future Horizons
International Journal of Educational Reform
This article analyzes religious education and highlights some points that can be the basis for reform in education to meet the diverse needs of religious students and broaden the scope of the field. In today's world, the main challenge of religious education and the basis for educational reform is diversity. Thus, there is a need for new theoretical models that can better define the target population of religious schools. An innovative typology is presented in which religiosity is expressed in terms of unique parameters constituting the concept of religiosity beyond the behavioral dimension, which enable us to suggest a more refined definition of religiosity and thus construct new, more relevant syllabi. A This article analyzes religious education and highlights some points that can be the basis for reform in education to meet the diverse needs of religious students and broaden the scope of the field. First, I present some of the definitions, dilemmas, and challenges of religious education, then I highlight possible future horizons. In a world of mass immigration and growing awareness of the role of religion, the main challenge of religious education and the basis for educational reform is diversity. Thus, there is a need to suggest new theoretical models that can more specifically define the target population of religious schools. From a religious point of view, these definitions have to be broad and diverse to reflect the differentiation and privatization processes that characterize today's multiple modernities. Religion is a major issue in global discourse today. It has become a major factor in the private and public spheres (REDco, 2009). Hence, it is also part of educational discourse. When dealing with religious education, Schreiner (2002) noted four major points that have to be taken into account: (1) differences in the religious landscapes of various countries; (2) differences in the role and value of religion in society; (3) the variety of state and religion relationships, ranging from separation of church and state (France, the United States) to sympathy (Poland, Ireland) to a complete merger between church and state (Israel); (4) differences in the internal structure of a country's school system (e.g., in the Netherlands, two thirds of the schools are religiously affiliated while the rest are religiously "neutral"; Schreiner, in press). Some countries have a monoreligious tradition (e.g., England), whereas in other countries, several religious traditions coexist (e.g., Germany and Swit
Confronting dualism in religious education
Journal of Religious Education, 2017
In 1942, Henri de Lubac identified serious problems with religious education. In his view, overly rationalist explanations and a reliance on pre-digested propositions undermined the essential element of mystery. He also cautioned against the prevailing Neo-Scholasticism, which hardened religious faith into separated departments of nature and grace, which promoted a response of rationalism on one hand and sentimentality on the other. Forty years later, Graham Rossiter called for a ''creative divorce'' between religious education and catechesis. While his intention was to make a necessary distinction between the two, it appears that some of his less subtle interpreters may have enacted the same kind of separation of categories that de Lubac warned about in the 1940s. The author proposes that the distinction between catechesis and religious education might be better expressed as a creative tension rather than a creative divorce. In the context of a Catholic school, catechesis and religious education need to be in continual dialogue with each other. The process needs to account for the theological anthropology of the human person-an integration of body, heart and mind. The exaggerated emphasis on mind in religious education and heart in catechesis may cause difficulties for students in integrating these dimensions. The distinction between catechesis and religious education remains a necessary mental tool for effective analysis, but we must beware of separating them in a way that prevents the students from engaging in the necessary Christian task of holding competing realities in creative tension.
Religious education and related challenges in the twenty first century
Bagheri, Khosrow (2000). Religious education and related challenges in the twenty first century. Tarbiate Eslami (3): 69-89.
The twenty first century has started with all its embedded challenges. These challenges have emerged in all fields. They will show their delicate and doubt raising presence in the realm of religious education accordingly. This article contains four sections: in the first part, the fundamental challenge of the twenty first century is analyzed. Then taking the proper encounter with this challenge into account, the concept of religious education will then be investigated. This investigation is done in two separate ways. In one part the issue of the «concept of education» and in the other part the «concept of religion and being religious» are examined separately. Afterwards, we focus on the elementary issues of religion and being religious and finally we propose the fundamental topic of religious education in conformity with the fore mentioned challenge.
This article shows that the role of the Study of Religions (i. e. Religions-wissenschaft, Sciences des Religions, the Science of Religions) in secondary education is increasingly the subject ofstudyby individual scholars ofreligions as well as by national and international associations for the Study of Religions. I argue that this interest is a corollary of social and cultural transformation processes such as pluralisation, secularisa-tion, and globalisation on the one hand, and of developments within the field of theology and the Study of Religions, in particular the coming into being of the latter as a separate discipline on a global scale, on the other. At the same time, next to scholars of religions and against the background of the same processes, educationalists have sought to broaden traditional religious education, in the form of the 'learning religion model, and give the Study of Religions a place in the secondary school curriculum, This article offers a reflection about the results of both pedagogica-l efforts and efforts ofscholars ofreligions to concep-tualise the role of the Study of Religions in secondary education in the context of Dutch society and beyond.