Greetingman as culmination of South Korean soft power diplomacy in Latin America (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Korean Diasporas in Mexico and Eurasia
The Diplomat Magazine, 2021
South Korea has combined foreign policy, soft power politics and public diplomacy in connecting with diaspora communities in Latin America and Eurasia. https://thediplomat.com/2021/06/the-korean-diasporas-in-mexico-and-eurasia/
Public Diplomacy, Soft Power and Language: The Case of the Korean Language in Mexico City
Public Diplomacy (PD) is the third pillar of South Korean foreign policy. According to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, PD aims to attract foreign audiences by means of art, knowledge transmission, media, language and foreign aid. When it comes to the Korean language, its global profile has seen an especially marked increase in recent years (Kim, 2009). Thus, this paper’s objective is to explain the relevance of the Korean language in the generation of South Korea’s soft power. I draw from César Villanueva’s reflections in order to problematize how language promotion can be translated into soft power at five different levels: the empathetic, the sympathetic, the geopolitical, the diplomatic and the utilitarian (2015: 140). I observe that in the case of the Korean language in Mexico City, soft power has the potential to be generated on three levels: it helps to increase knowledge of Korean culture (empathetic); it exercises symbolic persuasion (geopolitical), since the products of cultural industries are mostly in Korean; and it is used as a tool for economic transactions in Mexico City (utilitarian).
Formal Friendship, Real Suspicions: Diplomatic Relations between Mexico and South Korea, 1962-1987
México y la Cuenca del Pacífico, 2010
T his article deals with the initiation and development of diplomatic relations between Mexico and the Republic of Korea. Both countries started relations in 1962, but in a rather idiosyncratic way. While South Korea immediately opened an embassy and appointed a resident ambassador, Mexico made a deliberate effort to keep bilateral contacts to a bare minimum. Thus, Mexico only opened its embassy in Seoul in 1978 and posted a resident ambassador until 1987. The text addresses the explanation of this asymmetric relation, positing as main hypothesis that, given the antiimperialist lineages of its revolution, Mexico sought to establish a distance 1. An earlier version of this manuscript was presented at the 5th Kyung-Hee University-University of Guadalajara Workshop, The Asia-Pacific relations in the context of the global economic crisis, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, February 22-23, 2010. I wish to thank participants in the workshop for their kind comments. I also want to thank my Korean colleagues Kim Won-ho, Kwak Jae-sung, and Lim Hyo-sang for their helpful orientation during my research stay in Seoul in October-November, 2008. Usual caveats strongly apply. 2. José
Issues & Studies, 2022
This study aims to examine South Korean middle power diplomacy discourses using premodern Korea’s diplomatic thinking-cum-practice of sadae (serving the great) as a heuristic device. It is argued that current discourses of South Korea as a middle power resonate with sadae because they strive to secure the existing liberal international order led by the West and the United States. It also argues that it is both necessary and healthy for South Korean middle power diplomacy studies to denaturalize its self-evident faith in the existing liberal international order—a not universal but particular order among several possible others in history—with South Korea celebrating and appropriating liberal values. This would prepare South Korean middle power diplomacy research to tackle uncertainty, difference, and pluralism in global politics while producing more responsible and responsive scholarship in international relations.
KKI Policy Brief, 2021
Abstract: The Korean Wave is taking over the world, achieving great success in areas such as music and cinematography, and making Korean culture increasingly attractive. Culture being a crucial resource of soft power, which in turn serves as a powerful tool in international relations, the South Korean government is trying to take advantage of its improved national image and international influence. This analysis provides an overview of the relationship between the Korean government and the Korean Wave, how the perception of Korea has changed thanks to its cultural outflow, and how the government tries to use this to its advantage.
Public Diplomacy: Reappraising the South Korean Case through an Evolutionary Approach
Korea Journal, 2017
Despite a rising academic interest in South Korea's public diplomacy, little is known about its origins and evolution. Most existing studies have focused on the modern period of South Korea's public diplomacy, in particular the government's new foreign policy agenda since the late 2000s. Contrary to popular belief, this article argues that the recent infiltration of public diplomacy into South Korea's foreign policy represents de jure intensification of activities that de facto have been practiced from the second half of the 20th century. The present research divides the evolution of South Korea's public diplomacy into four periods: origins, diversification, polycentrism, and institutionaliza-tion. Each period has its own specific patterns, ends, and means. For instance, whereas the origins period arose with cultural and sports diplomacies, diversification included specific areas of engagement with foreign publics through official development assistance , knowledge, and exchange diplomacies. In turn, polycentrism has structurally transformed public diplomacy from a solely state-led activity into a polycentric framework of public and private partnership. Lastly, the institutionalization period re presents the government's recent efforts to establish a universal coordinative authority above its public diplomacy, which represents a fragmented set of activities conducted by various governmental institutions.
Becoming and Being a Middle Power: Exploring a New Dimension of South Korea’s Foreign Policy
The article documents the evolution of structural dimension in South Korean foreign policy through a study of middle power diplomacy in the post-2008 financial crisis period. This paper argues that middle power diplomacy, which propounds a global role for South Korea assuming leadership and substantially increasing international contribution is a paradigm shift in South Korean foreign policy posture, which until recently was limited to issues of Korean peninsula. Through the middle power discourse South Korea projects its role in the international affairs as a facilitator, interlocutor and norm entrepreneur focusing on international security, development and environment and is aimed at creating a space for Korean diplomatic entrepreneurism in the emerging international order.