Transmedia storytelling and memetic warfare: Ukraine's wartime public diplomacy (original) (raw)
Related papers
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 2018
Media and the Ukraine Crisis is a collection of essays that attempts to understand new ways of waging and narrating a war in the digital era. Its contributors rediscover the role of the media in contemporary international conflicts using the Russian-Ukrainian crisis as a starting point. That crisis, as almost all of the 11 chapters claim, initiated a new Cold War. It has been unfolding during the past four years, changing discursive practices, political processes, and relationships between media, citizens, and other social institutions. Today, when the new Cold War is at its peak-with the new anti-Russian sanctions and espionage scandals-the book becomes even more relevant for understanding the mediatized nature of conflicts and role of the media in their enactment, escalation, and resolution. Using the concept of "cultural chaos," the book demonstrates a structure of a new discursive order, where information flow is porous, hegemonic control over agendas is almost impossible, and traditional propaganda is not quite effective. Pantti, the editor, is head of Media and Communication Studies at the University of Helsinki. Examining the Ukraine conflict, its influence on the media, and the way they affected the course of the crisis, this edited volume makes a number of interesting theoretical contributions. They concern new media practices and actors (Part 1) and representation of the conflict in the media (Part 2). I see four theorizations as particularly useful for interdisciplinary scholars as well as researchers who work in the areas of journalism studies, media and communication studies, and Russian and East European studies. First, the book contributes to the development of the concept of hybrid media that does not disregard traditional media in favor of digital ones, but acknowledges their power and the processes of their hybridization with the online realm. Second, examining changing relationships between media consumers and producers, the authors make an interesting point about the role of "prosumers" (aka those who both produce and consume media content). Chapter 2 sees in open source journalism and user-generated content opportunities for nonelite actors to interfere and contest a dominant narrative. However, Chapter 3 complicates this view by 812780J MQXXX10.
JOURNALISM IN THE CROSSFIRE Media coverage of the war in Ukraine in 2014
War reporting has mostly been analyzed as a struggle between political and military control over information and journalistic professionalism. An analysis of reporting in mainstream media from the conflict in eastern Ukraine in 2014 shows that many other aspects must also be considered. In a comparative study, mainstream media coverage in four countries, Ukraine, Russia, Poland, and Sweden, was analyzed and interviews were held with journalists in the media included in the content analysis. Findings revealed significant variations in the framing of the conflict, portrayal of actors involved, and word choice across national settings. Interviews with journalists also high lighted crucial differences in approaches and perceptions. Results show that the specific journalistic culture in each country, self-censorship, and the degree of activist approach among journalists simi larly play an important role in war reporting. Researchers from all four countries participated in the project.
Journalism in the Crossfire: Media coverage of the war in Ukraine in 2014: [preprint]
2016
War reporting has mostly been analyzed as a struggle between political and military control over information and journalistic professionalism. An analysis of reporting in mainstream media from the conflict in eastern Ukraine in 2014 shows that many other aspects must also be considered. In a comparative study, mainstream media coverage in four countries, Ukraine, Russia, Poland, and Sweden, was analyzed and interviews were held with journalists in the media included in the content analysis. Findings revealed significant variations in the framing of the conflict, portrayal of actors involved, and word choice across national settings. Interviews with journalists also high lighted crucial differences in approaches and perceptions. Results show that the specific journalistic culture in each country, self-censorship, and the degree of activist approach among journalists simi larly play an important role in war reporting. Researchers from all four countries participated in the project.
Digital media practices in a conflict setting: Ukraine after the Maidan
Central European Journal of Communication
This article is a qualitative investigation of the mechanisms of reproduction of national identity narratives through digital media practices of hybrid populations in a conflict context using the example of Ukraine after the outbreak of the conflict with Russia. The article is based on a collection of 14 in-depth interviews with Russian-speaking Ukrainians from various regions. The findings point to several conclusions: first, hybrid/heterogeneous media practices are not always accompanied by high engagement. However, diverse heterogeneous and non-diverse homogeneous practices characterized by high engagement produced opposing narratives of national identity in the post-change Ukraine: a nation-centered interpretation of national identity homogeneous versus a universalistic post-national interpretation heterogeneous.
Introduction: Russian Media and the War in Ukraine
This collection of articles focuses on the Russian information war campaign that has accompanied and fueled the war in Ukraine. Of course, neither side has a monopoly on the use of propaganda and disinformation, and the latter are always present in any war. 2 But we have chosen to focus here on the Russian state media machine, as a phenomenon that not only looms especially large over the events of the past year but is also bound to continue to play a major role in shaping future developments in the region and beyond.