Communicating leakage risk in the hydrogen economy: Lessons already learned from geoenergy industries (original) (raw)
Related papers
Green Hydrogen and Social Sciences: Issues, Problems, and Future Challenges
Sustainability, 2023
The article presents a review of the research on green hydrogen from the social sciences, identifying its main lines of research, its problems, and the relevant challenges due to the benefits and impacts that this energy vector has on energy transitions and climate change. The review analyzes a corpus of 78 articles indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) and SCOPUS, published between 1997 and 2022. The review identified three research areas related to green hydrogen and the challenges for the social sciences in the future: (a) risks, socio-environmental impacts, and public perception; (b) public policies and regulation and (c) social acceptance and willingness to use associated technologies. Our results show that Europe and Asia lead the research on green hydrogen from the social sciences. Also, most of the works focus on the area of public policy and regulation and social acceptance. Instead, the field of social perception of risk is much less developed. We found that little research from the social sciences has focused on assessments of the social and environmental impacts of hydrogen on local communities and indigenous groups, as well as the participation of local authorities in rural locations. Likewise, there are few integrated studies (technical and social) that would allow a better assessment of hydrogen and cleaner energy transitions. Finally, the lack of familiarity with this technology in many cases constitutes a limitation when evaluating its acceptance.
Prospects for the Implementation of Underground Hydrogen Storage in the EU
Energies
The hydrogen economy is one of the possible directions of development for the European Union economy, which in the perspective of 2050, can ensure climate neutrality for the member states. The use of hydrogen in the economy on a larger scale requires the creation of a storage system. Due to the necessary volumes, the best sites for storage are geological structures (salt caverns, oil and gas deposits or aquifers). This article presents an analysis of prospects for large-scale underground hydrogen storage in geological structures. The political conditions for the implementation of the hydrogen economy in the EU Member States were analysed. The European Commission in its documents (e.g., Green Deal) indicates hydrogen as one of the important elements enabling the implementation of a climate-neutral economy. From the perspective of 2050, the analysis of changes and the forecast of energy consumption in the EU indicate an increase in electricity consumption. The expected increase in the...
The Hydrogen Policy Survey: Descriptive Statistics of the Study Sample and Their Policy Perspectives
In the context of a broader study of the policy process related to hydrogen as a fuel, we designed an electronic survey to collect policy beliefs from a wide range of stakeholders. In May, 2005, we sent an email to a sample of about 4,000 individuals, from about 1,450 different organizations in the United States and many other countries. The email contained a description of our study of the policy process related to hydrogen, an invitation to participate from the study, and a link to our online survey. The sample was drawn from several sources, primarily databases of attendees to conferences related to hydrogen. A total of 502 responses from 323 organizations were obtained, for an approximate 12% individuals' response rate and a 22% organizations' response rate. While we believe these response rates are encouraging taking into account that our survey targeted people with significant time constraints, it may be misleading to assess the quality of the response based on respons...
Let's go green with hydrogen! The general public's perspective
2012
It is well known in socio-economics that the success of an innovation process depends to a great extent on public acceptance. The German HyTrust project analyzes the current state of public acceptance in hydrogen technology in the mobility sector. This paper focuses on cutting-edge results of interviews, focus groups and a representative survey. Based on these results, almost 80% of the Germans are in favor of introducing hydrogen vehicles. But from the perspective of the general public, it is important that hydrogen is produced in an environmentally friendly way. HyTrust is the socio-scientific research project that accompanies the German Federal Government's National Innovation Programme.
Myths and Facts about Hydrogen Hazards
The anticipated entrance to the hydrogen economy has raised many concerns as regards its safe production, transport, storage and use, not excluding environmental concerns. Although it is true that hydrogen has been safely used for many decades, this has occurred until now in activities mainly in the chemical industry, where skilful and highly trained personnel are engaged. Yet, no one is certain what would happen when a layman handles a potentially hazardous material such as liquid hydrogen to refuel our cars. Such thoughts are sustained by the fact that there is still a significant shortage of knowledge on hazardous properties of hydrogen. Scepticism is also emerging on the environmental effects of large hydrogen leaks when hydrogen will be extensively used worldwide. This paper is a contribution to knowledge of hazardous properties of hydrogen and aims at offering a comprehensive overview on safety issues of this new energy carrier. It is shown that hydrogen safety concerns are no...
Risk-informed process and tools for permitting hydrogen fueling stations
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009
The permitting process for hydrogen fueling stations varies from country to country. However, a common step in the permitting process is the demonstration that the proposed fueling station meets certain safety requirements. Currently, many permitting authorities rely on compliance with wellknown codes and standards as a means to permit a facility. Current codes and standards for hydrogen facilities require certain safety features, specify equipment made of material suitable for hydrogen environment, and include separation or safety distances. Thus, compliance with the code and standard requirements is widely accepted as evidence of a safe design. However, to ensure that a hydrogen facility is indeed safe, the code and standard requirements should be identified using a risk-informed process that utilizes an acceptable level of risk. When compliance with one or more code or standard requirements is not possible, a n evaluation of the risk associated with the exemptions to the requirements should be understood and conveyed to the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ). Establishment of a consistent risk assessment toolset and associated data is essential to performing these risk evaluations. This paper describes an approach for risk-informing the permitting process for hydrogen fueling stations that relies primarily on the establishment of risk-informed codes and standards. The proposed risk-informed process begins with the establishment of acceptable risk criteria associated with the operation of hydrogen fueling stations. Using accepted Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) techniques and the established risk criteria, the minimum code and standard requirements necessary to ensure the safe operation of hydrogen facilities can be identified. Riskinformed permitting processes exist in some countries and are being developed in others. To facilitate consistent risk-informed approaches, the participants in the International Energy Agency (IEA) Task 19 on hydrogen safety are working to identify acceptable risk criteria, QRA models, and supporting data 1 . 1 This work is being conducted as part of Task 19 -Hydrogen Safety, a collaboration of experts from eight countries, under the Hydrogen Implementing Agreement of the International Energy Agency which operates under an international agreement of more than 26 countries. The overall goal of the IEA task on hydrogen safety is to develop data and other information that will facilitate the accelerated adoption of hydrogen systems and supports the accomplishment of the Hydrogen Implementing Agreement's stated mission: "…to accelerate hydrogen implementation and widespread utilization." Because of the nature of the International Energy Agency as an international agreement between governments, it is hoped that such collaboration will complement other efforts to build the technology base around which codes and standards can be developed.
For large-scale distribution and use of energy carriers classified as hazardous material in many countries as a method to assist land use planning, to grant licenses, to design a safe installation and to operate it safely some form of risk analysis and assessment is applied. Despite many years of experience the methods have still their weaknesses even the most elaborated ones as e.g. shown by the large spread in results when different teams perform an analysis on a same plant as was done in EU projects. Because a fuel as hydrogen with its different properties will come new in the daily use of many people incidents may happen and risks will be discussed. HySafe and other groups take good preparatory action in this respect and work in the right direction as appears from various documents produced. However, already a superficial examination of the results so far tells that further cooperative work is indispensable. To avoid criticism, skepticism and frustration not only the positive findings should be described and general features of the methods but the community has also to give strong guidance with regard to the uncertainties. Scenario development appears to be very dependent on insight and experience of an individual analyst, leak and ignition probability may vary over a wide range of values, Computational Fluid Dynamics, or CFD models may lead to very different result. The Standard Benchmark Exercise Problems, SBEPs, are a good start but shall produce guidelines or recommendations for CFD use or even perhaps certification of models. Where feasible narrowing of possible details of scenarios to the more probable ones taking into account historical incident data and schematizing in bowties, more explicit use of confidence intervals on e.g. failure rates and ignition probability estimates will help. Further knowledge gaps should be defined.