Long-term results of primary total knee arthroplasty with and without patellar resurfacing (original) (raw)
Related papers
Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78-B:226-228
The Bone & Joint Journal
We studied 40 patients in whom the patella was not severely deformed and who were undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis by one surgeon using one type of prosthesis. They were randomly allocated either to have the patella retained or resurfaced with a cemented, all-polyethylene component regardless of the state of the patellar articular cartilage. Apart from removal of osteophytes, no surgery was undertaken on the retained patellae. All 38 surviving patients were evaluated at three years using the HSS knee score and a new, specifically designed Patellar score (maximum score of 30). No TKA was revised, but two patients in the resurfacing group had a further unrelated procedure.
Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 1996
We studied 40 patients in whom the patella was not severely deformed and who were undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis by one surgeon using one type of prosthesis. They were randomly allocated either to have the patella retained or resurfaced with a cemented, all-polyethylene component regardless of the state of the patellar articular cartilage. Apart from removal of osteophytes, no surgery was undertaken on the retained patellae. All 38 surviving patients were evaluated at three years using the HSS knee score and a new, specifically designed Patellar score (maximum score of 30). No TKA was revised, but two patients in the resurfacing group had a further unrelated procedure. The mean HSS and Patellar scores at follow-up were 89 and 28 in the patellar retention group and 83 and 26 in the patellar resurfacing group. Statistically significant lower scores for both were recorded in women and in heavier patients. Stair-climbing ability was significantly bet...
BMC Research Notes, 2012
Background: The primary purpose of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to compare knee-specific outcomes (stiffness, pain, function) between patellar retention and resurfacing up to 10 years after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Secondarily, we compared re-operation rates. Methods: 38 subjects with non-inflammatory arthritis were randomized at primary TKA surgery to receive patellar resurfacing (n = 21; Resurfaced group) or to retain their native patella (n = 17; Non-resurfaced group). Evaluations were performed preoperatively, one, five and 10 years postoperatively by an evaluator who was blinded to group allocation. Self-reported knee-specific stiffness, pain and function, the primary outcomes, were measured by the Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Revision rate was determined at each evaluation and through hospital record review. Results: 30 (88%) and 23 (72%) of available subjects completed the five and 10-year review respectively. Kneespecific scores continued to improve for both groups over the 10-years, despite diminishing overall health with no significant group differences seen. All revisions occurred within five years of surgery (three Non-resurfaced subjects; one Resurfaced subject) (p = 0.31). Two revisions in the Non-resurfaced group were due to persistent anterior knee pain. Conclusions: We found no differences in knee-specific results between groups at 5-10 years postoperatively. The Non-resurfaced group had two revisions due to anterior knee pain similar to rates reported in other studies. Kneespecific results provide useful postoperative information and should be used in future studies comparing patellar management strategies.
2018
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) has been a very successful surgery in relieving pain and restoring function in osteoarthritis. Conflicting evidence in literature exists regarding the merits of patellar resurfacing during TKA over non-resurfacing. Our aim is to evaluate and compare the difference between patellar resurfaced group and non-resurfaced group in primary TKA. Materials and Methods: This prospective obsevational study was initiated in May 2016 conducted till April 2008 (2 years) in Yashoda Superspeciality Hospital, Hyderabad. At least 14 mm of patella was ensured to be retained after patellar cut. A total of 40 patients were allocated to receive (n=20) or not to receive patellar resurfacing (n=20) during primary TKA. The data was analyzed statistically using the Student t test. Overall patient satisfaction was recorded using the SF-36 score. Results: Of the 40 patients, 67.5% females and 32.5 % males underwent TKA. Among those who underwent resurfacement, 40% were males. 75% among the non-resurfaced group were females. Right knee was operated on 37.5% of cases. Mean operative time being 103.9 and 122.5 minutes in nonresurfaced and resurfaced cases respectively. Mean patellar thickness was 22.1mm in nonresurfaced and 23.6mm in resurfaced group. The difference in VAS score, modified HSS score, KSS scores between the two groups were statistically insignificant with p-values of 0.230, 0.0214, 0.2513 respectively at the end of two year, but there was significant reduction of anterior knee pain in the resurfaced with p-value < 0.001. Conclusion: The functional outcome was not affected by whether the patella was resurfaced or nonresurfaced. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to the prevalence of knee-related readmission, or of subsequent patella-related surgery or patients overall satisfaction. We recommend selective patellar resurfacing at the time of primary total knee replacement.
2018
Background There is no difference in the functional outcomes 6 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for knee osteoarthritis between patellar resurfacing and non-resurfacing. Thus, we have performed this study to compare the short-term clinical outcomes of TKA performed with and without the patella resurfacing. Methods A total of 50 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee (OAK) were randomized to receive patellar resurfacing (n=24; resurfaced group) or to retain their native patella (n=26; non-resurfaced group) based on envelope selection and provided informed consent. Disease specific outcomes including Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Society Function Score (KSKS-F), Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Short Form 36 (SF-36), and functional patella-related activities were measured within six months of follow-up. Results There was no significant difference between the resurfaced and non-resurfaced groups in p...
Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty
2001
Background: The management of the patella in total knee arthroplasty is still problematic. We aimed to identify differences in the clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty according to whether or not patellar resurfacing had been performed in a prospective, randomized study of 220 osteoarthritic knees.
2020
Background/Aim: To compare clinical outcomes between patellar resurfacing and nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Materials and Methods: Data from osteoarthritis patients who underwent TKA and were followed up for ≥ 4.5 years were analysed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups: patellar nonresurfacing group and patellar resurfacing group. In the Nonresurfacing group, the partial lateral facet of the patella was removed, the patella was reshaped to match the trochlea of the femoral prosthesis and circumpatellar denervation was performed. In the resurfacing group, the patella was resurfaced with a cemented component. Clinical outcomes included incidence of anterior knee pain, Knee Society Score, patient satisfaction, revision rate and radiographic findings. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess nominal data including the incidence of AKP, patient satisfaction score, and revision rate. P values < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Re...
Indian journal of orthopedics surgery, 2021
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) has been a very successful surgery in relieving pain and restoring function in osteoarthritis. Conflicting evidence in literature exists regarding the merits of patellar resurfacing during TKA over non-resurfacing. Our aim is to evaluate and compare the difference between patellar resurfaced group and non-resurfaced group in primary TKA. Materials and Methods: This prospective obsevational study was initiated in May 2016 conducted till April 2008 (2 years) in Yashoda Superspeciality Hospital, Hyderabad. At least 14 mm of patella was ensured to be retained after patellar cut. A total of 40 patients were allocated to receive (n=20) or not to receive patellar resurfacing (n=20) during primary TKA. The data was analyzed statistically using the Student t test. Overall patient satisfaction was recorded using the SF-36 score. Results: Of the 40 patients, 67.5% females and 32.5 % males underwent TKA. Among those who underwent resurfacement, 40% were males. 75% among the non-resurfaced group were females. Right knee was operated on 37.5% of cases. Mean operative time being 103.9 and 122.5 minutes in nonresurfaced and resurfaced cases respectively. Mean patellar thickness was 22.1mm in nonresurfaced and 23.6mm in resurfaced group. The difference in VAS score, modified HSS score, KSS scores between the two groups were statistically insignificant with p-values of 0.230, 0.0214, 0.2513 respectively at the end of two year, but there was significant reduction of anterior knee pain in the resurfaced with p-value < 0.001. Conclusion: The functional outcome was not affected by whether the patella was resurfaced or nonresurfaced. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to the prevalence of knee-related readmission, or of subsequent patella-related surgery or patients overall satisfaction. We recommend selective patellar resurfacing at the time of primary total knee replacement.
Evidence in orthopaedics: patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2004
Four good quality randomized clinical trials comparing patellar resurfacing versus noresurfacing in knee arthroplasty are analyzed. The outcomes evaluated were anterior knee pain, scores on the Knee Society’s rating system and reoperation. No relevant differences were found in knee scores, but anterior knee pain was less frequent in patients with patellar resurfacing. Few patients had severe anterior knee pain. Still, patients with anterior knee pain were less satisfied with the clinical result. Studies with longer follow-up showed that anterior knee pain increased with time in both groups. A clinically relevant increase in reoperation rate in the nonresurfaced group could not be excluded with the numbers available. Anterior knee pain seems to be influenced by the decision of resurfacing the patella during knee arthoplasty. Although it is not associated with important changes in knee scores, patients perceive it as a cause of insatisfaction. Influence of patellar resurfacing on implant supervivence is not clear.
The need for patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a literature review
ANZ Journal of Surgery
The controversy over whether or not to routinely resurface the patella during a total knee arthroplasty has persisted despite three decades of successful joint replacement procedures. Advocates for routine patellar resurfacing admit the occasional need for secondary patellar resurfacing and declare increased incidence of anterior knee pain in patients with non-resurfaced patellae as a cause for worry. Surgeons that leave the patella unresurfaced cite avoidance of complications that include patellar fracture, avascular necrosis, patellar tendon injury and instability. This review discusses the available literature on patellar resurfacing through an evidence-based analysis of randomized and pseudo-randomized controlled trials and published meta-analyses to date. The published literature seems to favour resurfacing the patellar routinely. Selective patellar resurfacing would be the ideal solution if sound pre-operative criteria could be established. So far, a method for accurately predicting which patients can avoid patellar resurfacing has not been found. Future research looking at patellar resurfacing should concentrate on developing criteria for selecting those patients that would benefit from patellar resurfacing and those that would do as well without resurfacing, and thus, limiting potential surgical complications.