Klezmer: Music, History, and Memory. By Walter Zev Feldman. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016. xxiv, 412 pp. Appendix. Notes. Bibliography. Glossary. Index. Illustrations. Photographs. Tables. Musical examples. $74.00, hard bound (original) (raw)
Book Reviews regarding Chagall's date and place of birth; although this information is important, such lengthy discussion is not very necessary. Another inaccuracy occurs in the description of the reasons for the help given by David Shterenberg to Chagall (113). Somehow, the author fails to mention that both artists had studios in the famous La Ruche in Paris before the First World War, which explains their strong bond in post-revolutionary years. Martinovich's book is nominally composed of three sections. The first deals with myths and mistakes which have often occurred in Chagall's biographies. It also offers an account of Chagall's return to Vitebsk from Paris. The second part describes Chagall's post-revolutionary work in Vitebsk, his conflicts with the artist Mstislav Dobuzhinsky and art-critic Aleksandr Romm, and his contradictory new rules and monopolistic control of his art school specializing in artistic production in Vitebsk. It also highlights the earlier dominant role of Chagall and the later hegemony of Malevich. The final chapter deals with the oblivion of people in Vitebsk toward Chagall and his oeuvre, as well as the broader contemporary attitude toward Chagall in Belorussia. With the new wave of interest in Chagall's life and work in Vitebsk, which will likely only be accelerated by the upcoming exhibition at the Pompidou Centre in Paris called Chagall, Lissitzky, Malévitch: L'avant-garde Russe à Vitebsk (1918-1922), this book makes a valuable contribution to the field of Russian art history. Martinovich brings out the hallucinatory vigor of Chagall's visionary life, and also the extreme solipsism of his personality. It is a well-written, compassionate portrait of a paragon of human talent and ambition confronted by misunderstanding and mediocrity.
Sign up to get access to over 50M papers
Related papers
Icons as a source of modernity for Marc Chagall
2024
This article is a part of a more general work on primitivism in painting and music featuring artists born within the bounds of the Russian Empire. The premise of the study is that, while it is generally considered as a whole, there is a plurality in the primitivist style, resulting from the variety of its sources. Three main groups of inspirations were pinpointed and, consequently, three directions that the Russian (neo-)primitivism takes, dealing with them. The "Scythian" style embraces various ancient, tribal, barbarous sources and all art related to pagan beliefs , while the "iconic" draws on Christian Orthodox art (starting with Russia’s Christianization. Finally, the "lubok" primitivism, named after the popular broadsheet prints popular since the seventeenth century, is the most recent and has strong ties with a folklore still much alive. The iconic primitivism is probably the most complex of the three as the iconic source is the most refined; it is a high-cultured art, rich and strictly codified. It is also more localized, limited to the Orthodox world and thus mainly present in the European territories of the Russian empire. The icon is without doubt and by far the most important genre of this type of primitivism. Three separate studies of the iconic style allow to observe three different aspects of this particular primitivism: starting with the works of Natalia Goncharova, an Orthodox Christian whose path can be considered as opposed to Marc Chagall’s the subject of the present paper, a Jewish artist with an outsider view of icons. A third paper will study equivalent inspirations in the musical world.
Avant-Garde Art in Ukraine, 1910–1930: Contested Memory by Myroslav Shkandrij
Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal, 2020
is a timely and urgently needed publication, as it presents Ukraine as a versatile, multiethnic country capable of harboring and nourishing complex artistic and intellectual endeavors. The book should be praised as material testimony to the author's travails of many years in countering incredulity in the very category of the Ukrainian avant-garde and also in complicating this category, moving beyond nativist or ethnic approaches to the idea. This publication compiles many of Shkandrij's previously published and partially reworked materials from websites or strictly academic articles to book chapters, as it narrates the story of the "cultural ferment among artists from Ukraine" (p. xi). Through a versatile mosaic of painting, posters, sculpture, film, and literature, the author addresses previously overlooked specifics of the phenomenon that not only originate from Ukrainian territory, but are connected to it by their traits. While tackling the issue, Shkandrij shares a wealth of information based on archival research and his direct communication with some artists' families. The reader learns not only the biographies of the leading artists, but also essential historical context, including Ukrainization (as part of korenizatsiia policies) and a very useful periodization that encompasses the rise and fall of the avant-garde movement in Ukraine. Like many authors working on understudied regions such as Ukraine, Shkandrij is compelled to combine field work with conceptualization, simultaneously filling gaps in factual knowledge and theoretic comprehension of the avant-garde in its Ukrainian dimension. Overtasked by the inherent complexity of his subject, the author muddles matters by attempting to weave some previously published materials together in one book, which suffers some inconsistencies and redundancies as a result. I refer to the excellent review by Oleh S. Ilnytzkyj, published on H-SHERA in March 2020, which
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.