Incidence and risk factors of residual bile duct stones after extraction by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (original) (raw)

Uncomplicated common bile duct stone removal guided by cholangioscopy versus conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Surgical endoscopy, 2017

Although previous studies have reported the possibility of therapeutic ERCP without fluoroscopy, more robust documentation of fluoroscopy-free common bile duct stone (CBDS) clearance is needed. Technically, "digital cholangioscopy" (DCS) may be used to confirm CBDS clearance. We aimed to compare the feasibility, safety, and radiation exposure between patients with CBDS undergoing stone removal by DCS and conventional ERCP (cERCP). Fifty (50) consecutive patients with a CBDS size < 15 mm underwent DCS (SpyGlass DS Direct Visualization System, Boston Scientific, Marlboro, MA, USA) between December 2015 and October 2016. Of 202 consecutive patients undergoing cERCP during the same time frame, 50 matched pairs were created using propensity score matching analysis. In the DCS group, patients underwent biliary cannulation and CBDS removal without fluoroscopy followed by DCS to confirm complete CBDS clearance. A final occlusion cholangiogram was performed as the current standa...

Evaluation of bile duct stones extracted by ERCP (Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography)

The Professional Medical Journal, 2021

Objective: To determine the frequency of different types of gallstones on ERCP stone extraction from bile duct. Study Design: Cross Sectional study. Setting: Department of Gastroenterology of the Nishtar Hospital Multan. Period: September 2019 to October 2020. Material & Methods: Patients with bile duct stones on imaging of either sex aged 18 – 70 years were included in our study while patients with IHD, malignancies, liver cirrhosis, asthma, TB, COPD, ILD and pregnant women were excluded from our study. During ERCP the gross appearance of extracted stones and related findings were noted. Results: Our study included 139 patients meeting inclusion criteria, of these 139 study cases, 49 (35.3%) were male and 90 (64.7%) were female patients with bile duct stone. Mean age was 45.78 ± 12.05 year (range; 27 – 68 years). Of these 139 study cases, 56 (40.3%) were from rural areas, 83 (59.7 %) were from urban areas, 52 (37.4%) had poor socioeconomic status and 87 (62.6%) were from middle inc...

Predictors of failure of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in clearing bile duct stone on the initial procedure

Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology, 2018

Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography associated with sphincterotomy and stone extraction with balloon or Dormia basket represents the gold standard for the management of common bile duct stones. The aim of our study were to investigate the predictors of failure of standard endoscopic techniques during the management of common bile duct stones. Methods: A retrospective study including all endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones between January 2014 and December 2017 was conducted. First line treatment was based on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic sphincterotomy and balloon or Dormia extraction. Second line endoscopic treatment was based on macrodilatation of Oddi sphincter, mechanical lithotripsy, biliary stent or nasobiliary drain placement. Predictors of failure of standard endoscopic techniques were sought by uni and multivariate analysis (SPSS software, p significant if < 0.05). Results: One hundred eighty one patients (mean age 64 years and sex ratio M/W ¼ 0.4) were included. Main indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were residual or recurrent lithiasis (67.4%, n ¼ 122). Cholangiography revealed multiple stones in 53 patients with an average size of 12.5mm [3-40]. The success rate of first line treatment was 61.9%. Independent predictors of failure of standard endoscopic techniques (failure of papillary cannulation or stone extraction) according to multivariate analysis were: an age greater than 65 years OR 0.516 [0.272-0.979], an intra-diverticular papilla OR 0.179 [0.035-0.914], a common bile duct diameter greater than 15 mm OR 0.161 [0.068-0.385] and a stenosis of the common bile duct OR 0.068 [0.008-0.605]. The success rate of the second line treatment was 73%. Conclusion: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography results in a successful clearance of the common bile duct in almost two-thirds of patients. In case of predictors of failure, alternative techniques can increase this rate.

Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation as a risk factor for stone residue after endoscopic transpapillary stone removal

BMC Gastroenterology, 2020

Background: Recent improvements in stone extraction implements and apparatus have lessened the complexity of the endoscopic bile duct stone treatment. However, despite confirmation of complete removal, cases of residual stones have been reported, which can result in recurrent biliary symptoms, cholangitis, and pancreatitis and considerably increase cost given the need for repeat imaging and/or procedures. To date, risk factors for residual bile duct stones following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) extraction have not been thoroughly evaluated. This study retrospectively investigated the incidence and risk factors of residual bile duct stones following extraction via ERCP. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all ERCP cases that underwent endoscopic bile duct stone extraction between April 2014 and March 2019. A total of 505 patients were enrolled and evaluated for the incidence and risk factors of residual bile duct stones after ERCP. Results: The rate of residual stones was 4.8% (24/505). Residual stones were detected by computed tomography (12/24) or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (12/24). In univariate analyses, a large number of stones (P = 0.01), long procedure time (P = 0.005), and performance of the pancreatic duct guidewire placement method (P-GW) for selective bile duct cannulation (P = 0.01) were the factors involved in residual stones. In multiple logistic regression analysis, performing P-GW was retained as the only independent factor of residual stones (adjusted odds ratio, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.19-9.88; P = 0.02). Conclusions: When removing bile duct stones with a pancreatic guidewire in place, paying attention to residual stones is necessary.

Extractability of common bile duct stones at endoscopic cholangio-pancreatography: a local experience

Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences, 2012

Background: Common bile duct stones are the treatable cause of obstructive jaundice. We aimed to determine the extractability of these at endoscopic cholangio-pancreatography in terms of size, number and location, using standard techniques. Methods: This descriptive study was conducted at Gastroenterology Unit, Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar from January 1997 to August 2009. Patients with common bile duct stones were included. Olympus JF-130 side-viewing video dudenoscope with Olympus CV-160 image processor and Toshiba CS-11 fluoroscope were used. After a scout film, contrast was injected to demonstrate stones. The number, size and location in common bile duct were noted. Sphinterotomy was performed using Olympus diathermy unit. Stone removal attempted using balloon-tip catheter and/or Dormia basket. Results: Total 170 patients with common bile duct stones were studied; 72(42%) males and 98(58%) females, mean age 48.86±13.4 years. Stone size was 1.5cm in 23(13.5%) patients. Aver...

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with less risk of complications after the removal of common bile duct stones by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology

Background/Aims: Several studies recommend prompt laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for choledocholithiasis. However, histopathological alterations in the gallbladder during this time interval and the role played by ERCP in causing these changes have not been sufficiently elucidated. To compare early period LCs with delayed LCs following common bile duct stone extraction via ERCP with regard to operation time, hospitalization period, conversion to open cholecystectomy rate, morbidity, mortality, and histopathological alterations in the gallbladder wall. Materials and Methods: A total of 85 patients were retrospectively divided into three groups: early period LC group (48-72 h; n=30), moderate period LC group (72 h-6 weeks; n=25), and delayed period LC group (6-8 weeks; n=30). Results: The operation time was significantly shorter, and the total number of complication rates and hospital readmission was significantly less frequent in the early period LC group (p<0.05). Ultrasound showed a significantly thicker gallbladder wall (>3 mm) in the moderate and late period LC groups than in the early period LC group (p<0.001). Culture growth was significantly higher, and fibrosis/collagen deposition in the gallbladder wall with injury to the mucosal epithelium was significantly more frequently detected by histopathological examination in the moderate and late period LC groups than in the early period LC group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Early period LC following stone extraction by ERCP is associated with shorter operation time, fewer fibrotic changes in the gallbladder, and lower risk for the development of complications. Therefore, LC can be performed safely in the early period after ERCP.

Endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones in nonagenarians: a tertiary centre experience

Clinical Endoscopy

Background/Aims: There are few studies assessed the efficacy and mortality of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones in the elderly aged ≥90 years. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of endoscopic removal of CBD stones in nonagenarians.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed ERCP reports for CBD stone removal. The endoscopic and therapeutic outcomes were collected. The length of stay (LOS), the total number of adverse events, and mortality rate were compared between groups.Results: A total of 125 nonagenarians were compared with 1,370 controls (65–89 years old individuals). The mean LOS for nonagenarians was significantly higher than in controls (13.6 days vs. 6.5 days). Completed intended treatment was similar in the nonagenarians and controls (89.8% and 89.5%, respectively). The overall complication rate did not differ between the groups. However, nonagenarians had a higher incidence of post-ERCP pneumonia (3.9%)...

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration After Failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Concomitant Gall Stones and Common Bile Duct Stones: A Prospective Study

Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A, 2016

The aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes of secondary laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and primary laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration. One hundred eighty-five patients undergoing LCBDE were divided into Group I consisting of patients undergoing a primary LCBDE (n = 102) and Group II consisting of patients undergoing LCBDE after failure of ERCP to clear the CBD stones (n = 83). Primary outcome measure was successful laparoscopic CBD clearance. The secondary outcome measures were degree of difficulty, operative time, complications, hospital stay, and the cost of treatment. Success rate was similar in both groups (85.3% versus 80.7%). Mean operative time, degree of difficulty, hospital stay, and cost of procedure were significantly higher in Group II (P value <.05). It may be prudent to consider ERCP failure patients for primary LCBDE than risk the complications of ERCP if they ar...