Executive Summary A study for the European Commission (original) (raw)
AI-generated Abstract
This report summarizes the findings of a monitoring study commissioned by the European Commission, aimed at assessing the integration of gender equality in scientific research within the Framework Programme 7 (FP7). It highlights the importance of gender representation in research teams, especially in male-dominated fields such as physics and engineering, and emphasizes how integrating gender dimensions can enhance the quality of research outcomes. The report provides recommendations for advancing gender equality in future research activities.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Related papers
Outcome of the Open Consultation on the European Strategy for Nanotechnology
Nanotechnology is emerging as one of the key technologies of the 21st Century and is expected to enable developments across a wide range of sectors that can benefit citizens and improve industrial competitiveness. Worldwide public investment in research and development in nanotechnology (R&D) has risen fromaround €400 million in 1997 to some €3 billion today. However, there are concerns that someaspects of nanotechnology may introduce new health, environmental and societal risks, which need to be addressed. In May 2004 the European Commission published the Communication “Towards a European Strategy for Nanotechnology” in which an integrated and responsible approach was advocated. This Communication has been discussed at thepoliticallevel in the European Council under the Irish and Dutch Presidencies. The aim of the survey conducted by Nanoforumwas to assess the wider response to the Commission’s proposed strategy and provide input to shape future European initiatives. A total of 720...
Why gender is relevant to materials science and engineering
2021
For historical reasons science today has substantially more evidence for males and men than for females and women, which means that quality of research and innovation outcomes may often be worse for women than for men. I explore how the gender dimension—a term used to mean effects of biological (sex) and/or socio-cultural (gender) characteristics—fits into new materials research and engineering and especially in nano-materials applications. Horizon Europe expects that grant proposals should include explanation if gender dimension is relevant to the project’s objectives. This paper shows that often the answer should be yes it is.
UNESCO Science Report towards 2030 2015
This volume analyses developments and trends in science governance worldwide between 2010 and 2015, within a UNESCO series of reports which monitors global trends every five years. This latest report provides data on research input and output for 189 countries and profiles 140 countries in greater detail. There are 11 country chapters and 13 regional chapters, plus three chapters analysing global trends, including as concerns innovation by the private sector (manufacturing firms), researcher mobility and women's participation in science and engineering.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.