My Submission to the International Criminal Court on the Inalienable Citizenship Rights of Minorities in Myanmar under Article 7 (1) (d) and 7 (2) (j) of the Rome Statue (original) (raw)
Related papers
Myanmar's Citizenship Law as State Crime: A Case for the International Criminal Court
State Crime Journal, 2019
This article argues that Myanmar’s authorities subject the Rohingya to human rights violations that can be accurately described as the crime of apartheid. Myanmar’s discriminatory application of its citizenship laws and processes is central to this crime, yet while Myanmar is not a signatory to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, the Court’s jurisdiction remains limited. However, Myanmar’s government has brought this crime to the territory of International Criminal Court (ICC) member state Bangladesh. Because Myanmar’s government insists upon Rohingya participation in discriminatory citizenship processes as a precondition of refugee repatriation to Myanmar, this presents the ICC with an opportunity to assert its jurisdiction. While current ICC investigation focusses mostly on alleged crimes committed by the Myanmar military, crimes associated with Myanmar’s citizenship processes would likely be the responsibility of Myanmar’s civilian government, including State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi, making Myanmar’s civilian political leaders liable for the first time to ICC prosecution.
Legal Aspects of the Right to Nationality Pursuant to Myanmar Citizenship Law
Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights
It is universally accepted that everyone has the right to citizenship. Myanmar’s framework on the right to nationality constitutes a unique, exclusive, ethnic citizenship system based on jus sanguinis or the law of blood. Myanmar’s Citizenship Law was enacted in 1982 by repealing the Union Citizenship Act of 1948. As citizenship parameters were changed by the Law, many people in the Kachin, Karen, and Rakhine states lost their nationality rights and consequently suffered human rights abuses. In the Rakhine state, serious communal violence occurred in 2012, 2016, and 2017, and the government declared a state of emergency. This research paper focuses on how Myanmar can adhere to international standards for nationality rights. It provides a historical overview and legal analysis of citizenship laws in Myanmar using a human rights lens and offers suggestions for legal reforms that can help address the problem of statelessness in Myanmar. Specifically, it recommends the use of the jus so...
Report on Citizenship Law - Myanmar
Report on Citizenship Law - Myanmar, 2017
Myanmar is an immensely diverse country from an ethnic perspective. Since its independence it has been immersed in an intense process of nation-building which heavily links ethnic identity and citizenship issues. Indeed, ethnic civil strife and tensions between the Bamar-dominated central plains and its hilly ethnic borderlands have defined much of its recent history. The country’s inhabitants have suffered the longest civil war to date since its independence, involving dozens of ethnic armed groups against the army and the central government. An ongoing peace process, led by the country’s de facto president, the Nobel Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi, is aiming at putting an end to such conflicts. In addition, being home to the largest stateless population worldwide, conflicts related to citizenship continue to destabilise further its political situation. Thus, the democratisation of Myanmar will necessarily require addressing its citizenship crisis. Resolving Myanmar’s decades-old statelessness problem will require significant changes in the way its law and policy makers –not the least their fellow citizens– understand its root causes.
International Criminal Court and its Tryst with Justice: The case of Myanmar
International Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 2020
The UN independent fact finding mission in 2018, distinctly corroborated by the UNHCR and Amnesty International, have evidently found the Myanmar Military forces of committing grave human rights violations cumulating to crimes against humanity and genocide. Myanmar's continuous denial of such crimes and its unwillingness to prosecute the perpetrators has brought the ICC in contention. Though Myanmar is not a state party to the Rome Statute, on a request by the chief prosecutor, the Pre Trial Chamber of the ICC has decided it has jurisdiction over Myanmar for the forcible deportation of Rohingyas to Bangladesh which amounts to crime against humanity. This article devolves the reasons for the accountability of the perpetrators at the ICC and the challenges ICC may face in holding the perpetrators liable. Finally the author would recommend ways by which the ICC may overcome such hindrances and result in accountability of the perpetrators.
Indonesian Law Journal, 2021
Notwithstanding obstacles to the power and jurisdiction of the ICC, the judges' posture is that the court is ever ready to protect ethnic minorities against any form of violations. Regarding the situation of the Rohingya people in Myanmar, the Pre-Trial Chamber 1 and III of the ICC held that the ICC could exercise jurisdiction over Myanmar, a non-party State to the Rome Statute, for the deportation of the Rohingya people to Bangladesh. With these decisions, international observers hope for accountability for those responsible for the crimes committed against the Rohingya people. It examines the applicable law and history of discrimination of the Rohingya people using the descriptive method and then examines the jurisprudence behind these rulings using the analytical method. Finally, this article suggests that the Rome Statute should be consistently interpreted by the ICC judges to advance the Rome Statute's intention, especially when ethnic minority groups are involved.
Myanmar (Burma), Ethnic Nationalities and the Rule of Law : A Critical Analysis
This thesis comprises both previously published and unpublished work. It considers the substantive rule of law with reference to selected constitutional and legislative legal considerations in relation to Myanmar and adopts a reform-oriented legal analysis approach. These considerations include the following: the interests of the communities of Rakhine State; the role of international law and the denial of aid in the context of a natural disaster; the need for a constitutional settlement to further the reform process; the legal framework in relation to land disputes; and the role of the legal profession.
The persecution of the Rohingya people in Myanmar has been recurrent news in the media for the last few years. Horrific images of torture and killing are being circulated in the social and other media. In the judgment of the UN the Rohingyas are being subjected to genocide and ethnic cleansing by the State of Myanmar. This work endevours to understand the historical and legal dimensions of the plight of the Rohingya people which is the worst atrocities against a people in modern times.
The Displacement of Muslims in Myanmar from the Perspective of International Human Rights Law
IAR Congratulations, 2023
Constitutes the concept of forced displacement especially in public international law It is illegal to evacuate a group of residents from the land on which they live It includes crimes, war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity, International private and public conventions and treaties under which forced displacement is defined, Therefore, we must clarify this concept and with the development of the situation in the region and the world Therefore, we must clarify this concept and with the development of the situation in the region and the world ,areas are subjected to this barbaric attack, Through this study, we seek to define the concept of forced displacement and the obligation of States to protect populations on their territory.