Promoting Program Success and Fulfilling Accountability Requirements in a Statewide Community-Based Initiative (original) (raw)
Related papers
PsycEXTRA Dataset, 2000
The move toward teacher empowerment in elementary schools with at-risk student populations is explored in this paper. Progress in addressing the needs of all students, especially those at risk, depends upon implementing teacher empowerment through participative decision-making. Methodology is based on experiencr:s of the Accelerated Schools Program at Stanford University, which developed accelcirated schools for at-risk students it five states, and a literature review on organizational effectiveness. Tbe introduction examines issues of responsibility for educational decisions and their consequences as viewed by teachers, administrators, and parents in schools attended by at-risk students. A conclusion is that many crucial decisions regarding curriculum, instructional strategies, materials, personnel selection, and resource allocation should be made by school staff at the site level, supplemented by student and parental participation. The second part reviews research on the relationship between participative decision making and organizational effectiveness in nonschool organizations. The third part offers a design for building the capacity of schools and districts based on site-based decision making strategies, focusing on the accelerated schools concept, unity of purpose, teacher empowerment and support, and accountability. The concluding section concerns roles and responsibilities of all actors in the school scenario, with emphasis on district and school goals and the need for specificity, implementation of plans, various levels of assessment, consequences of success or failure, and importance of structure. (64 references) (LMI)
2010
Empowerment evaluation advocated by David. M Fetterman is the use of evaluation concepts and techniques to foster transformation and self‑determination. In this article applicability and issues of empowerment evaluation is investigated through case study on empowerment evaluation of community program for health promotion in Tokyo. It provides an opportunity for a group of participants to empower themselves through evaluation activities as well as to internalize self‑evaluation mechanism for continuous improvement in the related organization. Major roles of evaluators include facilitator trainer of evaluation know‑how and even direct advocate to help the group be empowered. Empowerment evaluation appears most appropriate when the program itself has agenda of empowerment and social transformation. The mixed use of empowerment evaluation and conventional evaluations would make it possible to implement value‑pluralistic evaluations. The accumulation of experiences of empowerment evaluat...
Taking it to scale: Evaluating the scope and reach of a community-wide initiative on early childhood
Evaluation and Program Planning, 2008
In implementing broad community initiatives, the ability to assess the delivery of services is a distinct challenge. Yet, understanding both the magnitude and cross-usage of services by target populations is often a precursor to effective program evaluation, program improvement and additional program planning. This research examines the extent to which a comprehensive early childhood initiative successfully reached young children and their families in a large urban county. By linking birth records and administrative datasets at the level of the individual child, the study tracks the experiences of children in respect to engagement in program services and their receipt of public benefits. The study shows both the rapid growth in programs and the reach of the program elements to the majority of newborns in the target county after 5.5 years. The research highlights the challenges of effectively using individual-level data from a variety of sources for the purposes of documenting program receipt by participants.
AIDS Education and Prevention, 2005
We have been collaborating with many community-based organizations (CBOs) to increase their capacity to implement our evidence-based HIV prevention intervention. A frequent issue in these collaborations is how CBOs can evaluate their implementation of the intervention using feasible and sound methods. This study sought to provide the foundation for evaluation recommendations, tools, training, and technical assistance to help CBOs build their evaluation capacity. We conducted a qualitative study of 21 CBOs, 12 funders, and 11 technical assistance providers regarding beliefs and attitudes about evaluation, preferences and requirements for evaluation, evaluation methods that are currently being used at CBOs, and recommendations regarding feasible and effective evaluation that CBOs can use. The themes that arose in the telephone interviews are organized around three major topics: facilitators and barriers to conducting evaluation, evaluation methods that CBOs use, and how to increase CBOs' capacity to conduct evaluations.
The Meaning of Effectiveness in Assessing Community Initiatives
American Journal of Evaluation, 2006
In the present climate of public accountability, there is increasing demand to show “what works” and what return is gained for the public from investments to improve communities. This increasing demand for accountability is being met with growing confidence in the field of philanthropy during the past 10 years that the impact or effectiveness of community initiatives can be measured. A review of recent evaluation reports and literature reveals three different meanings of effectiveness in use: increased understanding, accountability, and demonstrated causal linkages. Drawing on a general analysis of the concepts of accountability, effectiveness, and causality, each meaning of effectiveness is examined in light of its implications for evaluation design. The article closes with a guiding schema for organizations planning evaluations to help determine which kind of effectiveness is important in light of organizational values and aims.
Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 2010
A new genus of district and school improvement models entails partnerships with other organizations and new working relationships with families, community leaders, and youths. The Ohio Community Collaboration Model for School Improvement (OCCMSI) is one such model. It enables partners to leverage family and community resources for learning, healthy development, and overall success in school. This study presents qualitative research findings about the key capacities developed by 6 schools and 6 districts piloting the OCCMSI. Process and product innovations, as well as facilitators and barriers, were tracked as these sites progressed with their implementation efforts. Implications are drawn in relation to how these new and expanded capacities might be prioritized by district and school leaders, consultants, and other professionals involved in partnership-centered models of school improvement.
Comprehensive Community Initiatives: Principles, Practice, and Lessons Learned
The Future of Children, 1997
Comprehensive community initiatives strive to improve the lives of children and families in neighborhoods characterized by extreme and concentrated poverty. The initiatives use multifaceted approaches to strengthen communities and improve the provision of social and other services to children and families. Early examples include the settlement houses at the beginning of the twentieth century, the neighborhood programs of the 1930s, and the war on poverty efforts of the 1960s. Using specific examples, this article describes key features of current comprehensive community initiatives, the limitations of efforts to evaluate them, and factors contributing to their success or failure.