Between conflict and cooperation: The Contrasting image of the Ottoman Turks in Late Medieval Ragusan Sources (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Rhetoric of the Frontier of Christendom in the Diplomacy of Renaissance Ragusa (Dubrovnik)
This article seeks to analyse the most important rhetorical strategy of Ragusan diplomacy, traditionally directed towards the Christian Europe: an endlessly repeated claim that Ragusa, situated on the frontier with the Orthodox “schismatics” and Muslim “infidels”, performs an important mission in the interest of Catholic and Christian religion. The first goal of this article is to reconstruct the historical development of this rhetoric, starting from its first appearance in the fourteenth century until its full articulation in the sixteenth. The second goal is to analyze the types of situations in which it was used and the purposes for which it served. The third goal is to put the Ragusan rhetoric in context, comparing it to the rhetoric of other Renaissance states situated on the frontier of religions, such as the Iberian kingdoms, Poland, and Hungary.
The Serbs and the Overlapping Authorities of Rome and Constantinople (7th to 16th Century)
The political and ideological relations of the Serbs with Rome and Constantinople should clearly be analyzed bearing in mind the general context, character and rhythm of wider relations between these two political, ecclesiastical and ideological centres. Such analysis must never lose sight, however, of how inextricably these aspects were intertwined in the old Roman province of Illyricum -the often mutable historical and geographical term used to describe the territory of the original Serbian settlement in the Roman empire. The extent of the influence of Rome and Constantinople in the region depended, naturally, on many factors. Among these, four main vectors of structural character and of longer duration can be discerned. One is the rhythm and intensity of the imperial renewals of Rome and Constantinople as the two main centres from which the conception of Romanitas and the corresponding political and ideological influences were generated. 1 The next is the problem of church jurisdiction, which, until 1054, was usually resolved, theoretically and practically, by demarcation of the spheres of interest of the regional churches. After the division of the Christian world, however, the question of jurisdiction was additionally complicated by the two different conceptions of ecclesiology and Orthodoxy. The third factor is related to the four most important 'Roman' institutions: that of the Constantinopolitan (the Byzantine, including the Latin) emperor, the Pope, the Constantinopolitan Patriarch and the Western (Frankish and German) emperor, and to their perplexed mutual relations, especially with regard to their ambition and capacity to act as either theoretical or actual sources of earthly or spiritual authority and as the heads of corresponding, though often opposing, political 1 The Roman identity of Byzantium has recently been discussed in several studies, see I. Stouraitis, Roman identity in Byzantium: a critical approach, in BZ,
Article from: Türkenkriege und Adelskultur in Ostmitteleuropa vom 16.-18. Jahrhundert (Studia Jagellonica Lipsiensia, Band 14, GWZO, Universität Leipzig) / Born, Robert ; Jagodzinski, Sabine (eds.). - Ostfildern: Jan Thorbecke Verlag , 2014. 87-104 (ISBN: 978-3-7995-8414-2). Summary: In the 16th and partly in the 17th century, the Croatian and Slavonian nobility often threatened the Habsburgs with surrender to the Ottomans, especially in times of fierce combats. Other social strata, the peasants and the military, even voluntarily changed sides and accepted the jurisdiction of a more amenable overlord in their attempt to survive. Their interactions with the Ottomans therefore cannot be characterised as merely confrontational. Actually, conditioned by an attempt to avoid devastation and annihilation, the opposing sides were engaged in various types of rather complex interactions and thus challenged the paradigm of antemurale Christianitatis. This paper addressed two main issues. Firstly: were the threats of surrender to the Ottomans a plausible political option in the Croatian-Slavonian Kingdom? Secondly, the question as to whether the Ottomans can be seen as the principal adversaries of the Croatians and Slavonians during the early modern period, the archenemy of Christianity. Paper scrutinised everyday practices of interactions with the Ottomans at the Military Border as well as forms of negotiations of different representatives with the Ottomans.
Cyrillic Correspondence between the Commune of Ragusa and Ottomans from 1396 to 1458
State and Society Before and After Establishment of Ottoman Rule, eds. S. Rudić and S. Aslantaş, Belgrade 2017., 2017
An important source for an overview of relations between the Commune of Ragusa and the Ottoman Empire is Cyrillic correspondence of these states. In this paper I analyze letters from the period between 1396 and 1458. Namely, the first preserved document in the Serbian language dates from 1396, while the year 1458 marks the end of the research since Ragusa became a vassal of the Ottoman Empire. The Ragusan letters to Turkish officials had a similar form as documents which they were sending to Serbian and Bosnian rulers and noblemen. Through their analysis it is possible to determine what kind of reputation Ottomans had in the eyes of the Ragusans. On the other hand, Ottoman letters combined patterns of Serbian and Turkish diplomatics. The content of most of the letters referred to the status and privileges of Ragusan merchants in the Ottoman territory. It should be noted that Ragusans avoided contact with Sultans because they were afraid that he would impose the payment of tribute to their commune. Therefore, they tried to resolve problems of their citizens in communication with Ottoman military commanders and officials.
The Pontic King of Bosnia in Anti-Ottoman Crusading in the Mid-1470s
History in flux
The paper focuses on a selection of documents from Italian archives that have not been included in the standard reference source collections from the past two centuries. The documents reveal certain “curiosities” such as the identity/identities of the king of Bosnia in the mid-1470s or papal appeals to support a Greek rite Christian lord against the Ottoman Turks. The newly found or re-found information allows new insights into the complex connections that shaped the growing area of contact between Free Christendom and the Ottoman Empire. The same information also indicates the limitations–recent or not–of different “over-reaching” interpretations of partially known documentary evidence.
Birgit Krawietz and Florian Riedler, eds., The Heritage of Edirne in Ottoman and Turkish Times: Continuities, Disruptions and Reconnections (Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2020), pp. 302-344, 2020
As the first Ottoman capital on European soil, Edirne was a place of great importance for diplomats of the Republic of Dubrovnik (Ragusa). With the gradual transfer of the political center to Istanbul in the period after its conquest in 1453, Edirne ceased to be the final destination of Ragusan diplomatic missions. However, it continued to be an important station for diplomats travelling to Istanbul. As a matter of fact, Ottoman sultans often resided in Edirne in ensuing centuries as well, so that Ragusan envoys also tended to dwell in the city, particularly in the second half of the 17th century. Although the 18th century was marked by the gradual disappearance of Ragusan merchants from Balkan towns, Dubrovnik even appointed a vice- consul to Edirne at the end of the century – the first and the last one, because in 1808 the French abolished the Republic. Even though there was no official Ragusan colony in Edirne, as one of the main trade centers of the Balkans, it attracted Ragusans as well as other foreign and domestic merchants. To meet the needs of envoys, the Republic of Dubrovnik maintained a residence in the city from the mid-16th century on, if not already earlier. In addition to the residence, there was a chapel that served the spiritual needs of diplomats and other Ragusans, as well as the wider Catholic “Latin” community. The existence of the church within the residential complex was in accordance with Ragusan privileges, but contradicted postulates of Islamic law. This brought about a series of litigations that lasted over a century, ranging from petitions for the church to be repaired to disputes with Jewish neighbors. The dispute over the chapel and residence in Edirne correlated with quarrels Ragusans had in other Balkan colonies with competing local merchants, such as Orthodox Serbs and Bulgarians, Muslims, and co-religious Bosnian Catholics, indicating that the cause of the dispute in Edirne was probably not mere confessional bigotry. Moreover, the question of the Ragusan church in Edirne throws light on the complex character of Ottoman law. In its regular form, the latter already represented a complex amalgam of two different and sometimes contradictory elements, namely Islamic law (sharia), and state law (kânȗn) ; the involvement of a third, completely alien element – capitulations with a foreign state (sg. ahdnâme) – led to misunderstandings by the local authorities and numerous litigations with Ragusans and interventions by the Porte as the highest legal instance. Be it as minor as it may in comparison with the histories of other major religious and ethnic communities of the city, the Ragusan example provides an important if peculiar insight into the complex commercial, social, religious, legal, and diplomatic realities of Edirne.
2. Uluslararası Osmanlı Coğrafyası Arşiv Kongresi. Bildiriler, cilt 1, (eds. Hatice Oruç – Mehmet Yildirir – Songül Kadioğlu), T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı Tapu ve Kadastro Genel Müdürlüğü Arşiv Dairesi Başkanlığı, Ankara, 2019, 269-278
This paper provides an outline and brief summary of the Slavic, Latin and Italian documents from the late Middle Ages which are currently kept in the State Archives of Zadar and Dubrovnik in the Republic of Croatia, highlighting their great potential and possibilities for the research and study of early Ottoman history in the Balkans. These rich archival collections contain diverse and valuable facts about the establishment and functioning of Ottoman rule in South-East Europe, but despite of that, the information they give has not yet been fully incorporated into the dominant historical narratives about the rise of the Ottoman Empire. The greatest obstacle to the full appreciation of their importance has been the obvious language barrier, but a systematic approach to these documents could generate valuable results and further advance our knowledge about the history of the Balkans and the Ottoman Empire in the fourteenth and fifteenth century. Therefore, in the hope of drawing the attention of the global community of medievalists and ottomanists to these documents and archives, I have presented a general description of the existing records, their organization and arrangement, as well a brief assessment of the kind of information that they include.
Guneydogu Avrupa Arastırmaları Dergisi, 2009
Biased approaches to Bos11ia11 historiography in general, strong 11atio11alist sentiments and excessive i11terpretatio11s of certain phenomena have produced a number of disagreements berween scholars. This refers especially to the Bosnian religious histOIJ'· The purpose of my paper is twofold. It examines modem hisroriography of the early Ottoman Bosnia, and attempts to open some new venues to the study of the encounters berween difl'erent religious co1111111111ities and their representatives. /11 the first two centuries of Ottoman rule, th e attitude of Ouoma11 center towards co1fessio11al structure of Bosnian society, is a result of political, economic and social circ11111sra11ces 011 one hand, and the result of the Ottoman strategy of accepring some local i11stit11tio11s and including some 11011-Muslim elements into the milita1J1 class 011 the other. My paper consists of an overview of th e co11f essio11al structure in Bosnia, and an analysis of the relationship be/ween !he two churches (Catholic and Orthodo:>.) in the Balkans, focusing on the encounter between Ottoman State, Catholics, and Orthodox Christians.