The Republic in Danger: Drusus Libo and the Succession of Tiberius (original) (raw)
Related papers
The History Teacher, 1979
Overview This course will examine the history of Rome from its foundation in 753 BC, to its transformation into an Empire by AD 14. We will look at the idealism of the Republican political structurean idealism borrowed in 1776 to create the American Constitutionand we will trace Rome's transition from an insular polity concerned with local affairs to its undisputed mastery of the Mediterranean. The course will focus on key events in Republican history which came to define Rome's militaristic, aggressive identity, such as the Second Punic War. We will also look to more recent events as we discuss the role of corporate greed, failures in political morality, debt, and economic issues in triggering the collapse of the Republic and the emergence of a dictatorial monarchythe Empire. The continuation of this course is CLCV HIST 2905A, The Roman Empire, which will be offered in the Winter of 2016. Main problems, questions and themes These are some of the questions and problems we will consider throughout this course. Keep them in mind for your tests and essays. Rome. What did it mean to be Roman at various points in history? How did the Rome of 500AD differ from the Rome of 100BC? In what ways was the late Republic different to the early Republic? How did this affect peoples' perceptions of themselves as "Romans"? What is the legacycultural, political, legal, etc.of Rome to the world today? Historians and historiography. This course places a certain amount of emphasis on the writing of history. How do we evaluate the testimonies, histories and accounts of the Roman Republic? What are some of the main problems? How have pictures of Rome been skewed by other concerns, in both modern and ancient historiography?
The Oxford History of the Roman World, 2024
This is chapter 2.5 of the forthcoming Oxford History of the Roman World. It is at the copy-editing stage, not yet in press. This means there is a little time to solicit feedback: comments, criticisms, suggestions for improvement. I invite you to comment.
Liberty and the Founding of the Roman Republic: Livy I-II
Livy's History of Rome was a celebrated classic in his own lifetime. In the tumultuous era of the Roman civil wars, which spanned more than a half century, Livy's readers turned to his account of ancient Roman history for consolation and repose. His treatment of the generations of Rome's paternal and maternal ancestors seems like the stuff of fables or legend: from the grafting of the exiled Aeneas' Trojan branch by marriage on to indigenous and sturdy Latin stock, firmly rooted in Italian soul; through the new roots first planted at Alba Longa by Aeneas' son, Ascanius, and strengthened by 13 generations of Silvian kings; to the series of events that conspire-partly by necessity, and partly by chance-to bring forth the twins, Romulus and Remus, who eventually would restore the Silvian kingdom to their grandfather, its rightful heir, and then immediately depart-following their own "desire to establish" for themselves a new city of their own making in the forests and hills near the Tiber river where they were raised. Once the new city, Rome, is established through divine sanction and Romulus' spirited defense of the principle of numerical superiority over priority in time, the founder of the city fortified the walls upon his Palatine hill and began to shape the character of the people who would reside there, and become Romans.
The Fall of Cassius Dio’s Roman Republic
Klio: Beiträge zur Alten Geschichte Vol. 101/2: 473–504, 2019
This article reinterprets Dio’s view of the fall of the Republic by arguing that Dio viewed institutional political competition, rather than ambitious individuals, as the central destructive driving force in the Late Republic. Dio’s interpretation is hereby unique among ancient historiography. This interpretation has been skilfully interwoven in the general narrative and only by reading Book 39 as a whole, does the interpretation emerge. According to Dio, institutional competition became inherently destructive in the Late Republic and Book 39 is absolutely fundamental in understanding this transformation and the consequent failure of the Roman δημοκρατία.
2019
… but apart from that-the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh water system, and public health-what have the Romans ever done for us? Monty Python Life of Brian Students of International Relations (IR) have paid little attention to the Roman Empire. They have tended to think of Rome as ancient history and of empires as scarcely relevant for interstate relations. Yet, a walk around the capital cities of the West suggests otherwise: Colonnades, triumphal archs and imperial eagles in London, Paris, Berlin, Washington indicate that the Great Powers have been deeply affected by the example of Rome. It's symbols, at least, are alive and well-those of the Republic as well as those of Empire. This chapter will linger a bit on the concepts of Republic and Empire. Both terms are still in common use. But they are often bandied about with little regard for their origins and their substance. Let it be clear at once: both terms are of Roman origins. 'Republic' refers to a mixed form of government. 'Empire' is derived from the Latin verb imperare which refers to the right of command; most particularly military command. This right was explicitly given to Augustus around 30 BC for having introduced order and peace to Rome after a series of civil wars. Thus, he could call himself 'emperor' and refer to his realm as an 'empire'. This right to command is ancient. It is much older than Augusts. And this simple fact provides the vantage point for this chapter: the bulk of the Roman Empire was conquered militarily long before Augustan times. Most of the imperial expansion, in other words, took place under the Republic. In fact, once the Empire was formally declared, expansion slowed significantly down. It more or less ground to a halt after the death of Emperor Trajan in AD 117. This chapter, then, eschews the standard historical narrative of Rome's evolution from Republic to Empire. It begins with the premise that Rome was (almost) always an empire, but not always a Republic. It argues that the importance of Rome-the Republic as well as the Empire-is greater that routinely assumed by IR-scholars, because the Great Powers of the West evolved their systems of administration and governance in the shadow of Rome's example. And since European states are built around systems of Roman law and administration, the study of Rome ought to given more attention
From the Roman Republic to the Roman Empire: Transition, Slogan and Memory
Past and Future, 2024
This critical analysis explores the transition of the late Roman Republic into the autocratic Principate, eventually creating the imperial dynasties of the Julio-Claudian and the Flavians. The reality of autocratic leadership after the civil wars of the first century BCE had to be cloaked within the terminologies of Republican institutions and through the co-option and control of other leading families and individuals. The crucial test for this new ‘settlement’ was the peaceful succession of political and military power from one leader to the next, preferably within the ruling family, i.e. how a dynasty could be established without triggering political revolts or another round of civil wars. However, the Republic itself had not been forgotten. Indeed, patterns of opposition to the Julio-Claudians were sometimes motivated by Republican sentiments, or at least cloaked in its terminology and with some effort to revive power to the Senate. On four occasions during this period there was either a call for a return to ‘Republican government’, or in invocation of republican political terms as a regulator of public life. The issues involved were raised as early as the succession of Tiberius in 14 CE, where the continuing institutional power of the Principate was clearly demonstrated. The events immediately following the assassination of Caligula (41 CE) and the decline in Nero’s government after the Pisonian conspiracy show that a return to Republican government was highly unlikely. Likewise, the events of 69 CE, where military commanders vie for control of the empire in a new cycle of civil wars, illustrates the institutional forces in operation against any return to a republican form of government. Instead, we have a shift of emphasis towards a re-interpretation of libertas in relation to the auctoritas of emperors during this period. By this time republican slogans were mobilized as symbolic propaganda for an empowered imperial administration that had already sidestepped the popular Assemblies and the Senate as sources of authority.