The Mind Technology Problem and the Deep History of Mind Design (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Minds We Make: A Philosophical Inquiry into Theory of Mind and Artificial Intelligence
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 2025
This theoretical paper offers an in-depth examination of the intersection between Theory of Mind (ToM) and artificial intelligence (AI), drawing on developmental psychology and philosophical analysis. By investigating the key developmental stages at which children begin to understand that others have distinct mental states, the paper provides a framework for assessing the cognitive boundaries of AI systems. It critically interrogates the pervasive human inclination to anthropomorphize machines, particularly through the attribution of complex mental states like "knowing," "thinking," or "believing" to AI entities that lack subjective experience. The paper argues that AI, while capable of simulating cognitive processes, operates without the conscious awareness that defines human cognition, raising profound epistemological and ethical questions. It explores the broader implications of this projection for society, considering how our conceptualization of AI affects both technological development and social structures. Ultimately, this interdisciplinary inquiry calls for a more nuanced understanding of the distinctions between human and machine cognition, advocating for responsible approaches to AI as its capabilities evolve.
Mind and machine: ethical and epistemological implications for research
2010
Technologies are significant in research not only as instruments for gathering data and analyzing information; they also provide a valuable resource for the development of theory-in terms of what has been called the ''tools to theory heuristic.'' Focusing on the specific example of the fields of educational psychology and instructional technology and design, this paper begins by describing how the workings of the ''tools to theory heuristic'' are evident in the metaphors and descriptions of behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism. In each of these psychological paradigms, the mind is understood in terms of a contemporaneous technological innovation: as rudimentary circuitry, as computerized data processing, and finally, in terms of information representation and visualization. The paper then argues that in applied disciplines like educational technology and human-computer interaction, technology plays two important but conflicting roles. It first operates heuristically to explain complex mental phenomena; it is then designed and developed explicitly as a tool for facilitating and developing these same complex mental processes. This paper concludes by arguing that this dual role represents an ethical dilemma-a kind of epistemological and practical ''conflict of interest'' in instructional technology and in related fields of systems and interface design.
The Interpenetration of Mind and Machine
PsycEXTRA Dataset, 2000
We here provide our assessment of the growing intimacy which is the relationships between humans and technology. With the development of each more innovative and intimate system, the line between human and machine is becoming increasingly blurred. The concept of human qua human and machine qua machine are no longer situated at polar extremes of a human versus automation spectrum. Rather, human and machine represent a converging dyad that is evolving toward a hybrid commonalty. Within this overarching context, we discuss the concept of intimacy using four basic dimensions: i) the internal perspective, ii) the external extension, iii) interpersonal interaction, and finally, iv) the societal reflection. Through the use of three case study personae (a disabled individual, a military operative, and a student), these dimensions are shown to be flexible to the characterization of various classes of users and can thus be used to frame the multilevel and emerging impacts of emergent physical and cognitive intimacy.
Human Enactment of Intelligent Technologies: Towards Mètis and Mindfulness
World Scientific Publishing Company, 2021
This book demystifies what artificial intelligence is, examines its strength and limitations in comparison to what humans are capable of, and investigates the nature of human adaptive expertise across the concept of mètis. It also examines a particular family of mindsets that we as humans have adopted over the ages, namely epistemologies of representational knowledge. These representational perspectives have followed us into numerous fields, including how we perceive and comprehend human cognition — leading to 'with a hammer everything looks like a nail' syndrome. As such, this book presents the alternative phenomenological viewpoint of embodied direct reality within the cognitive sciences in the form of radical embodied cognition and, more importantly, how it allows us to better highlight and comprehend human mètis and its adaptive expertise. We then examine why we collectively continue to enact and perpetuate predominant mindsets of representations across the phenomena of mindlessness. To counter this, we re-visit the practice of individual and collective mindfulness, providing a potential 'beachhead' in our re-appropriation of technology (artificial intelligence) towards achieving the best of both worlds — that is, allowing human creativity and ingenuity to be expressed with artificial intelligence as a tool to help us do just that across meaningful human control. Finally, we conclude by examining current top-of-the-horizon activities and debates regarding quantum physics in relation to the human mind and artificial intelligence and how, once again, representational mindsets need not be the only tool in town.
1989
Abstract: The author tries to explain his view of artificial intelligence, and more broadly how it fits into science as a whole. In doing so, he will not hesitate to indulge in sheer speculation when it seems to fit the topic. He will begin with a negative thought (one that he does not ...
Mind and Machine. The New Spaces of Robots and Digitization
Ethics in Progress, 2019
This special volume of Ethics in Progress addresses the issue of mind and machines. Machines have always been a tool or technical instrument for human beings to facilitate and to accelerate processes through mechanical power. The same applies to robots nowadays-the next step in the evolution of machines. They already clean our houses, mow our lawns, hunt terrorists via drones and transport heavy loads. Robots are somehow "enchanting to humans", as Maciej Musiał (2018) puts it. Over the course of the last few years, robot usage in society has expanded enormously, and they now carry out a remarkable number of tasks for us. In many sectors, like finance, medicine, education or agriculture, transportation and factory production, it is likely that there are at least a handful of jobs for human workers that will sooner or later be replaced by robots or autonomous solutions. Furthermore, robot scientists like Kevin Warwick believe that they are able to develop an artificial brain, comparable to our human brain, that is able to generate a robotic mind. According to Nick Bostrom, we are far "from having reached the physical limits of technology" (Bostrom 2014, 110). If that is indeed the case, we are on the eve of a historic revolution that will change everything we know right now. But not only robots have an impact on our life. It is digitization in its entirety, including smart applications and games, that confronts us with new spaces. And, the realization that robots are embodied cognitive systems present us with even more new spaces for impact, along with new anxieties for how to live in a world in which we cannot entirely deduce the behaviour of complex systems from their initial programming. We have been accustomed to think of robots as extensions of ourselves, either in the benign sense of being tools or the threatening sense of being our moral shadow. The new spaces in which robots exist, though, may not be as either the fulfilment of our desires or the manifestation of our fears, but as something entirely different-another emergent cognition, holding forth the possibility that what