Nurse staffing effects on patient outcomes: safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals (original) (raw)

Nurse Staffing and Patient Care Quality and Safety

2008

The importance of nurse staffing to the delivery of high-quality patient care was a principal finding in the landmark report of the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) Committee on the Adequacy of Nurse Staffing in Hospitals and Nursing Homes: "Nursing is a critical factor in determining the quality of care in hospitals and the nature of patient outcomes" 1 (p. 92). Nurse staffing is a crucial health policy issue on which there is a great deal of consensus on an abstract level (that nurses are an important component of the health care delivery system and that nurse staffing has impacts on safety), much less agreement on exactly what research data have and have not established, and active disagreement about the appropriate policy directions to protect public safety.

The Effects of Nurse Staffing on Adverse Events, Morbidity, Mortality, and Medical Costs

Nursing Research, 2003

Dean G. Smith Background: Nurse staffing levels are an important working condition issue for nurses and believed to be a determinant of the quality of nursing care and patient outcomes. Objectives: To examine the effects of nurse staffing on adverse events, morbidity, mortality, and medical costs. Methods: Using two existing databases, the study sample included 232 acute care California hospitals and 124,204 patients in 20 surgical diagnosis-related groups. The adverse events included patient fall/injury, pressure ulcer, adverse drug event, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, wound infection, and sepsis. Multilevel analysis was employed to examine, simultaneously, the effects of nurse staffing and patient and hospital characteristics on patient outcomes. Results: Three statistically significant relationships were found between nurse staffing and adverse events. An increase of 1 hour worked by registered nurses (RN) per patient day was associated with an 8.9% decrease in the odds of pneumonia. Similarly, a 10% increase in RN Proportion was associated with a 9.5% decrease in the odds of pneumonia. Providing a greater number of nursing hours per patient day was associated with a higher probability of pressure ulcers. The occurrence of each adverse event was associated with a significantly prolonged length of stay and increased medical costs. Patients who had pneumonia, wound infection or sepsis had a greater probability of death during hospitalization. Conclusion: Patients are experiencing adverse events during hospitalization. Care systems to reduce adverse events and their consequences are needed. Having appropriate nurse staffing is a significant consideration in some cases.

Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcomes (Articles)

2000

Background: Nursing studies have shown that nursing care delivery changes affect staff and organizational outcomes, but the effects on client outcomes have not been studied sufficiently. Objective: To describe, at the level of the nursing care unit, the relationships among total hours of nursing care, registered nurse (RN) skill mix, and adverse patient outcomes. Methods: The adverse outcomes included unit rates of medication errors, patient falls, skin breakdown, patient and family complaints, infections, and deaths. The correlations among staffing variables and outcome variables were determined, and multivariate analyses, controlling for patient acuity, were completed. Results: Units with higher average patient acuity had lower rates of medication errors and patient falls but higher rates of the other adverse outcomes. With average patient acuity on the unit controlled, the proportion of hours of care delivered by RNs was inversely related to the unit rates of medication errors, decubiti, and patient complaints. Total hours of care from all nursing personnel were associated directly with the rates of

The association between nurse staffing and inpatient mortality: a shift-level retrospective longitudinal study

International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2021

Background: Worldwide, hospitals face pressure to reduce costs. Some respond by working with a reduced number of nurses or less qualified nursing staff. Objective: This study aims at examining the relationship between mortality and patient exposure to shifts with low or high nurse staffing. Methods: This longitudinal study used routine shift-, unit-, and patient-level data for three years (2015-2017) from one Swiss university hospital. Data from 55 units, 79,893 adult inpatients and 3646 nurses (2670 registered nurses, 438 licensed practical nurses, and 538 unlicensed and administrative personnel) were analyzed. After developing a staffing model to identify high-and low-staffed shifts, we fitted logistic regression models to explore associations between nurse staffing and mortality. Results: Exposure to shifts with high levels of registered nurses had lower odds of mortality by 8.7% [odds ratio 0.91 95% CI 0.89-0.93]. Conversely, low staffing was associated with higher odds of mortality by 10% [odds ratio 1.10 95% CI 1.07-1.13]. The associations between mortality and staffing by other groups was less clear. For example, both high and low staffing of unlicensed and administrative personnel were associated with higher mortality, respectively 1.03 [95% CI 1.01-1.04] and 1.04 [95% CI 1.03-1.06]. Discussion and implications: This patient-level longitudinal study suggests a relationship between registered nurses staffing levels and mortality. Higher levels of registered nurses positively impact patient outcome (i.e. lower odds of mortality) and lower levels negatively (i.e. higher odds of mortality). Contributions of the three other groups to patient safety is unclear from these results. Therefore, substitution of either group for registered nurses is not recommended.

A Longitudinal Examination of Hospital Registered Nurse Staffing and Quality of Care

Health Services Research, 2004

Objective. To evaluate previous research findings of the relationship between nurse staffing and quality of care by examining the effects of change in registered nurse staffing on change in quality of care. Data Sources/Study Setting. Secondary data from the American Hospital Association (AHA)(nurse staffing, hospital characteristics), InterStudy and Area Resource Files (ARF) (market characteristics), Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) (financial performance), and Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) (quality measures--in-hospital mortality ratio and the complication ratios for decubitus ulcers, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection, which were risk-adjusted using the Medstat s disease staging algorithm). Study Design. Data from a longitudinal cohort of 422 hospitals were analyzed from 1990-1995 to examine the relationships between nurse staffing and quality of care. Data Collection/Extraction Methods. A generalized method of moments estimator for dynamic panel data was used to analyze the data. Principal Findings. Increasing registered nurse staffing had a diminishing marginal effect on reducing mortality ratio, but had no consistent effect on any of the complications. Selected hospital characteristics, market characteristics, and financial performance had other independent effects on quality measures. Conclusions. The findings provide limited support for the prevailing notion that improving registered nurse (RN) staffing unconditionally improves quality of care.

The relationship between nurse staffing and patient outcomes: A case study

International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2009

Background: Research has shown a direct relationship between staffing levels and patient outcomes for specific nurse-sensitive indicators, with lower patient to nurse ratios (i.e. less patients per nurse) associated with better outcomes. Objectives: To explore the relationship between nurse staffing characteristics (the nursing hours worked by permanent and temporary staff and nurse hours per patient day) and patient outcomes: pressure sores, patient falls, upper gastrointestinal bleed, pneumonia, sepsis, shock and deep vein thrombosis. Design: A case study using retrospective hospital data, at ward level. Setting: A tertiary cardio-respiratory NHS Trust in England, comprising two hospitals. Participants: All patients, including day cases, who were admitted to either hospital as an in-patient over 12 months. Methods: Data were extracted from corporate hospital systems. The clinical areas were categorised as lower dependency, i.e. wards, or critical care which included ICU and high dependency units. The relationship between nurse staffing characteristics and patient outcomes was assessed using either a Poisson or negative binomial regression model as appropriate. We sought to establish whether the outcomes were affected by the nurse hours per patient day, the permanent nurse hours worked as a percentage of the total hours, and the permanent nurse hours worked as a percentage of the permanent and bank hours combined. Results: In the lower dependency category wards there was only a weak association demonstrated between nurse staffing and the majority of the outcomes. The results from the high dependency critical care areas showed few significant results with only the rate of sepsis being significantly reduced as the ratio of permanent staff hours increased. Conclusions: The study demonstrated the possibility of using existing hospital data to examine the relationship between nurse staffing and patient outcomes, however the associations found were weak and did not replicate reliably the findings from previous work.

The Association of Shift-Level Nurse Staffing With Adverse Patient Events

JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 2011

Objective: The objective of this study was to demonstrate the association between nurse staffing and adverse events at the shift level. Background: Despite a growing body of research linking nurse staffing and patient outcomes, the relationship of staffing to patient falls and medication errors remains equivocal, possibly due to dependence on aggregated data. Methods: Thirteen military hospitals participated in creating a longitudinal nursing outcomes database to monitor nurse staffing, patient falls and medication errors, and other outcomes. Unit types were analyzed separately to stratify patient and nurse staffing characteristics. Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression modeling was used to examine associations between staffing and adverse events. Results: RN skill mix, total nursing care hours, and experience, measured by a proxy variable, were associated with shift-level adverse events. Conclusions: Consideration must be given to nurse staffing and experience levels on every shift.