The Correlation Between Being Informed on Complementary and Alternative Medicine and Its Reported Use Among Cancer Patients in Yogyakarta (original) (raw)
Related papers
Discoursing the use of complementary therapy for cancer care in Indonesia: A perspective
Journal of Holistic Nursing Science
The use of CAM in Indonesia is relatively high, but this method is still considered a second-class treatment. There are still many modern medical practitioners who have not accepted this method as a method of treatment that can be accounted for. This article attempts to explain why complementary-alternative medicine continues to develop and why it needs to be widely proposed as a treatment method of choice, in addition to modern medical treatment. Conventional medical medicine or modern medicine and complementary-alternative medicine have different philosophical foundations, so imposing an assessment using biomedical methods to prove the efficacy of CAM seems less appropriate. Suppose evidence of efficacy is required for CAM to be accepted. In that case, it seems that research methods with qualitative and anthropological approaches should be chosen that provide more space for individual experiences in the use of CAM. Keywords: Complementary and alternative medicine; modern medicine...
Journal of Young Pharmacists, 2018
Objective: Number of CAM user among person suffer from cancer was high, especially breast cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of CAM in breast cancer patients in a public hospital in Padang, Indonesia. Methods: This study was descriptive study with cross-sectional design done for three months for all patients suffering from breast cancer in oncology unit in a public hospital in Padang, Indonesia. Breast cancer patients who are unable to communicate well and/or are unwilling to take part in the study are excluded. Data were collected by structured interview for patients who used CAM and open interview for patients who not use CAM. Results: Among 85 participants, 8 of them (9.41%) never use CAM, 22 of them (25.88%) had used CAM for some period and 55 of them (64.71%) had been using CAM. Herbal medicine was the most commonly used in CAM therapies, followed by supplement, spiritual healing, and Chinese medicine. The reason to use the CAM is their belief that the CAM...
were willing to participate in the study. Research data were collected using a sociodemographic characteristics form regarding CAM practices of cancer patients and the Beck Hopelessness Scale (total points 20, rising with the degree of hopelessness). Written consent from the head physician of Çanakkale State Hospital and verbal consents of the patients were obtained in order for the research to be performed. The data were analysed usign the SPSS 13.0 program (numbers and percentages, chi-squared and Mann Whitney U tests). Findings: Of the patients ( 49.1%, female and 50.9% male) 78.2% had been living with a cancer diagnosis for more than two years. Of the 23.6% of patients with breast cancer and 21.8% with lung cancer, 87.2% uses CAM (72.7% received alternative treatment and 65.5% complementary treatment). Alternative treatments apply herbal treatments concomitantly such as honey, garlic; balsam apple, iscum album, tar oil and 29.1% of them only use stinging nettle. As a complementary treatment; 60% of patients pray for healing and 16.4% of them have massage regularly. Patients explained that they were using the alternative medicine in order to mitigate effects of the disease, to prevent its recurrence, to increase blood values, to feel psychologically relieved; and they were using complementary medicine just to feel psychologically relieved. Of 60% patients chose not to share their CAM practice with doctors and nurses. 36.4% of them use CAM on friend advice, 20% under media influence, 36.4% on their own initiative and 21.8% under family influence. The satisfaction from CAM is 61.1%. The rate of those who find alternative medicine expensive is 21.8%. There is statistically no correlation between CAM practice and age, gender, marital status, location they live for a long time, education and financial status of patients (p>0.05). The average of total hopelessness score of patients is 8.09 ± 2.59, there is no statistically meaningful correlation between hopelessness score average of patients who use CAM and who do not use (p>0.05). Conclusion: The cancer patients in the study who live in Çanakkale province and in its districts use CAM. CAM practice does not vary by selected sociodemographic characteristics and the hope level. It is important that the health care professionals (nurse, doctor, etc.) should be conscious of CAM-drug interactions and notify the patients about the risk.
Complementary/alternative Medicine Use among Cancer Patients in Malaysia
World Journal of Medical Sciences
The objective of this study was to determine the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among cancer patients in Malaysia. A cross-sectional study was carried out among cancer patients at two Malaysian referral hospitals. The questionnaire consisted of 28 items includes patients’ socio-demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics and questions about CAM use. A total number of 200 cancer patients participated in this study. The majority were female, Malay, married, with tertiary education and working (54.5%, 36.5%, 53.5%, 46.5%, 45.0%; respectively). The majority were in stage 2 and diagnosed with cancer 1 to 2 years ago (47.5%, 37.5%; respectively). The prevalence of CAM used among the study participants was found to be 14%. The majority of them used the CAM during the treatment (72.7%), used the CAM less than six months (37.0%). The majority of cancer patients reported that CAM is beneficial for them and there is no side effect of CAM and they were satisfied w...
Journal of Holistic Nursing , 2019
The aim of this study was to explore nurses’ knowledge and attitudes toward the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among cancer patients in a palliative care setting. A descriptive quali-tative approach was used in this study. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 nurses recruited using purposive sampling. The data were analyzed using an inductive semantic approach. Thematic analysis identified that nurses possess limited knowledge of CAM. Nurses were skeptical toward CAM and less confident to recommend its use. Four main themes (and two subthemes) emerged: Understanding of CAM, Hesitative Attitudes, Personal Experience, and Preferences in Learning about CAM. There is a need to integrate CAM topics into nursing education programs in order to develop nurses’ knowledge and build positive attitudes toward CAM use. Sufficient knowledge and positive attitudes toward CAM would support safety and quality of care in management of patients with cancer who use or are contemplating using CAM
Acta Oncologica, 2005
A study was undertaken to analyze the extent of using complementary alternative medicine (CAM) and to compare sociodemographic and medical characteristics of users and non-users of CAM in Turkish oncology patients. A total of 615 patients with cancer who attended ambulatory patient care units answered the questionnaires. Medical information was reviewed from chart data. Some 291 patients (47.3%) had used at least one type of CAM since the time of initial diagnosis. CAMs almost always consisted of herbal agents (95%). Nettle (Urticae herba ) used in conjunction with (88%) or without (56%) various herbal agents were the most popular and prominent CAMs used by patients. Univariate and multivariate comparisons of users and non-users of CAM were performed. In multivariate analysis, female sex (p 0/0.0006), high income (p0/0.0008), advanced stage at diagnosis (p0/0.02), and usage of multiple chemotherapy applications (p 0/0.03) were determined as independent factors for CAM use.
The Perspective of Cancer Patients on the Use of Complementary Medicine
International Journal of Cancer Management, 2019
Background: Cancer is considered one of the most important health issues in Iran. Regarding that Iranians have a positive attitude towards complementary medicine; the demand for this type of treatments is increasing. However, those undergoing this treatment often have limited awareness on it. Objectives: This study aims at determining the perspective of cancer patients on using complementary medicine. Methods: In this descriptive study, 176 cancer patients from all over the country were selected by purposeful sampling, according to the inclusion criteria and, then, completed demographic characteristics questionnaire and the Questionnaire on Integrating Complementary Medicine in Oncology Treatment. The data were analyzed, using SPSS software version 20. Results: More than half of the patients used complementary medicine and according to their viewpoints, using herbal medicine was considered their first priority. At the same time, 46% of the research samples consulted with care providers on how to use complementary medicine for cancer treatment. The most frequent referrals to specialists were referrals to complementary medicine experts. The researchers expected complementary medicine to improve their symptoms of anxiety, fatigue, and depression. Conclusions: The use of complementary medicine as a complementary approach in cancer patients can have an impact on the improvement of symptoms, which ultimately enhances the quality of life in patients. Due to the concerns about applying these approaches, it is necessary to train care providers in order to consider the perspective of cancer patients in this regard and to obtain their past medical history.
Alteration of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Usage in Patients with Cancer in Turkey
Medicine Science | International Medical Journal, 2013
Use of complementary and alternative medicine CAM is commonly encountered among cancer patients. The method most commonly adopted is the use of alternative medicine products. In this study, use of CAM by Turkish cancer patients, its frequency and CAM usage alteration in over time according to results of previous studies were evaluated. Patients were enrolled from a single centre (Kayseri Training and Research Hospital) and the data of total 559 patients were recorded. The rate of CAM usage was 62.1% in general population. Of the patients adopted a method of CAM, 11.8% was using alternative medicine products, 60.1% was using complementary medicine and 28% was receiving support from both. Patients with breast cancer were the most frequent subgroup adopting a method of CAM. Most frequently used alternative medicine products were urtica dioica, nigella sativa and salvia officinalis. Music, exercise and prayer were the most common methods of complementary medicine. Turkish cancer patients have switched from alternative medicine products which could show in vivo interaction with the cancer therapy to the methods of complementary medicine which do not interact with the cancer therapy in vivo.
African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines, 2011
This study was conducted to find out the frequency of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use that could lead to troubles in patient health and in applied standard therapy protocols when used improperly, which method is used, the reasons for use and from which resources the information about this topic were obtained. A questionnaire consisting of 28 questions was applied to 195 patients with cancer diagnosis by a face-to-face interview. The obtained data were assessed with SPSS 11.5 program. Out of 195 cancer patients, 100 (51.3%) were using CAM and 48.7% (n=95) were not. The most commonly used agent was nettle (72%). This was followed by herbal teas (21%), grape molasses (20%) and black seed (20%). The frequency of CAM use was found higher in those under age 50, in literate people, in those working during the diagnosis stage and having disease at the later stage. While CAM was commonly recommended by friends and relatives of the patients (73%), this ratio was only 5% for health professionals. While 51.3% of all patients were gathering information about CAM, 75% of those actually using CAM gathered information about it. Whilst information was gathered mostly from the relatives of patients and tamperers (47%), it can be gathered from physicians only with a ratio of 10%. Cancer patients use CAM and they gather information mainly from unreliable sources rather than physicians. Although the primary information source should be physicians, the ratio for this was very low (10%). We suggest that physicians should spend more time in gathering correct information and sharing them with their patients for a better guidance.
Survey of the use of complementary and alternative medicine among Turkish cancer patients
Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2002
Objectives: To measure the frequency of use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among patients with malignancy undergoing or following conventional treatment, to determine demographic characteristics associated with the use of CAM, and to find out how benefits, if any, were perceived by patients. Design: A 35-item survey questionnaire administered to 305 return patients with malignancy. Setting: Clinical wards of the Oncology and Haematology departments of Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey. Methods: Questionnaire-based measures of demographics, motives, expectations and effects of using CAM, and types and reported perceived benefits of CAM practised on patients with malignancy. Results: The majority of return patients (n = 186, 61.0%) used at least one CAM practice; and birthplace, educational status, and family type were significant factors in such behaviour. Conclusions: Patients with malignancy born in villages, having less education and living in large families were more likely to use folk medicine. More than half of those using CAM (n = 99, 53.2%) reported as benefits the feelings of either strengthening of the body, being in good psychological condition, or the disappearance of several symptoms. C