The Man in the Partnering State: Regendering the Social Through Partnership (original) (raw)
Related papers
tOw ARDs COheRent CARe AnD eDuCA tiOn suPPOR t POliCies FOR new ZeAlAnD FAMilies
2000
The reconciliation of work and family life involves two aspirations that are important both to individuals and to societies: to participate fully in the labour market, generating income but also seeking individual fulfilment, and to provide the best for one's own children, giving them the care and nurturing they need. These aspirations need not be mutually exclusive, but many parents
Equality and Family Responsibilities: A Critical Evaluation of New Zealand Law
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
The causes of women's persistent inequality in the workplace are complex but work-family conflict and gendered patterns of care-giving undoubtedly play a role. This paper describes existing New Zealand law designed to prevent discrimination against those with family responsibilities and utilises regulatory scholarship to critically evaluate it. It concludes that stronger enforcement mechanisms and positive duties to promote workplace cultures where those with family responsibilities are not disadvantaged would be helpful additions to the existing legal framework.
Implementing Working for Families: the impact of the policy on selected Māori whānau
Kotuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 2011
This paper presents an analysis of the qualitative data collected for a study investigating the effect of the Working for Families policy on Māori families' self-reported whānau ora (family wellbeing). Data are drawn from a discrete set of 30 qualitative interviews undertaken with Māori whānau involved in the Te Hoe Nuku Roa Longitudinal Study. Whānau perceptions about how the Working for Families policy has impacted on their lives and the contribution the policy has made towards their family's wellbeing is presented. The paper discusses how the Working for Families policy appears to have become an integral component of household income for many low-to-middle-income whānau and reflects on how this policy, conceived and designed (amongst other things) to alleviate and redress child poverty, is contributing towards supporting family wellbeing or 'whānau ora'.
Kotuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 2013
In New Zealand there are many ways to become a parent, including two-parent families of heterosexual and homosexual couples, single parents, adoptive parents, kin carers, wha ̄ngai arrangements, long-term fostering, guardianship and assisted reproductive technologies. In this paper we discuss the different pathways to parenthood, how they have come about, and New Zealand’s laws, policies and practices that make them possible but also challenging. Two areas of law of particular interest are the implications of the Adoption Act 1955, which continues to be discriminatory, although some of its provisions have been reinterpreted in the courts, and the Care of Children Act 2004, which introduced ‘modern’ parenting arrangements but allowed conflicts to remain with previous child care Acts. The new Home for Life policy introduced by the Ministry of Social Development will also be critically discussed, in light of its weaknesses. We conclude with implications of the varied pathways and identified gaps in our current knowledge that call for further research.
Despite the poor outcomes of early childbearing increasingly found to be equivocal, there remains a persistent pathologising of teen parent-ing, which structures government response. By applying a Foucauldian analysis to the recently introduced Young Parent Payment, this article examines the political rationalities that shape government responses and welfare assistance for young parents in Aotearoa/New Zealand. A biopolitical concern for the good economic citizen and right parent is found to inform the social investment approach, and exclude those who do not conform. Discourses about being Māori, young, a parent and needing financial assistance frame young Māori parents as at risk of long-term welfare-dependency and a threat to their own children. Welfare assistance is demonstrated to be a disciplinary practice to punish young