Estimation Method for Alpha Particle Counting Efficiency for Scintillation Flasks (original) (raw)

1997, Radiation Protection Dosimetry

Fluence-to-absorbed dose conversion coefficients and their variations with angle of incidence have been computed for monoenergetic beams of electrons incident on rod and pillar ICRU-tissue phantoms used for calibration of ring and wrist or ankle dosemeters for measurement of personal dose equivalent to the skin. Beams are normal to the axes of the cylindrical phantoms. For normally incident electrons, conversion coefficients for both the rod and pillar phantoms are equal to those for the slab phantom. However, they differ markedly from each other and from those for the slab phantom at electron angles of incidence as great as 90°, as measured between the beam direction and an inward directed radius through a dose point at distance 0.007 cm beneath the surface of the phantom. * By mass, 76.2% oxygen, 11.1% carbon, 10.1% hydrogen, and 2.6% nitrogen (1) .

Design of tissue equivalent scintillators for precise dosimetry purposes

Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 1997

A tissue equivalent plastic scintillator containing Chlorine has been designed through Monte Carlo simulations and mass energy transfer coefficient calculations, searching for the optimum concentration of that element whose role is to make the value of the absorbed radiation energy equal in tissue and plastic scintillators. The plastic is obtained by mixing the base component of most current plastic scintillators, Poly-Vinyl-Toluene, with Vinyl-Benzyl-Chloride. In addition, we propose two kinds of plastics, one for diagnostic X-rays and another one for therapy.

Calibration of a scintillation dosemeter for beta rays using an extrapolation ionization chamber

Medical Physics, 2004

A scintillation dosemeter is calibrated for 90 Sr/ 90 Y beta rays from an ophthalmic applicator, using an extrapolation ionization chamber as a reference instrument. The calibration factor for the scintillation dosemeter agrees with that given by the manufacturer of the dosemeter within ca. 2%. The estimated overall uncertainty of the present calibration is ca. 6% ͑2 sd͒. A calibrated beta-ray ophthalmic applicator can be used as a reference source for further calibrations performed in the laboratory or in the hospital.

Correction factors for parallel-plate chambers used in plastic phantoms in electron dosimetry

Physics in Medicine and Biology, 1997

In electron beam dosimetry using parallel-plate chambers solid phantoms are sometimes necessary. To obtain the dose to water from the ionization obtained in the solid phantom, fluence correction factors and perturbation factors have to be applied. In this study fluence factors in a perturbation free geometry have been determined experimentally for common phantom materials. Wall perturbation factors for simulated Attix, NACP, and Roos chambers have also been determined for the same materials. Comparative Monte Carlo calculations have been performed using the EGS4 Monte Carlo code. Comparison with data in newly published protocols such as IAEA and IPEMB shows an agreement with the results obtained in this paper to within 1%, demonstrating that the data published in these protocols may be used with reasonable accuracy if recommended phantoms are used. The results also show that if unsuitable phantom materials are used, the wall perturbation factors may differ for different chambers and for different phantom materials by more than 3% and perturbation factors have to be considered in order to obtain a high accuracy in the dose determination.

The DosiMap, a new 2D scintillating dosimeter for IMRT quality assurance: Characterization of two Čerenkov discrimination methods

Medical Physics, 2008

New radiation therapies techniques like IMRT permit to deliver highly conformal dose distributions which present considerable efficiency. Because of the complexity of these dose distributions (high gradients, small irradiation fields, low dose distributions…) higher precision controls than in classical radiotherapy are required to control the conformation of the delivered dose to the planned dose distribution and to guaranty the quality of the treatment. Currently, this verification is the most usually performed by matrix of ionization chambers, dosimetric films, portal imaging, or dosimetric gels. All of them present drawbacks making them time consuming. Scintillation dosimetry has many advantages such as tissue equivalence, linear response in radiotherapy energy range, and high spatial resolution, and is a very suitable solution for this purpose. It has been developed for about 15 years (mainly through scintillating fiber devices) but is still at an experimental level for routine dosimetry because Čerenkov radiation produced under irradiation represents an important stem effect.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.